采样方式对地震监测闪烁室法测氡仪校准结果的影响研究

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2020.04.015

地震 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 191-197.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2020.04.015

采样方式对地震监测闪烁室法测氡仪校准结果的影响研究

周红艳¹, 任宏微², 宁洪涛¹, 黄仁桂¹, 赵影¹, 姚玉霞³

1.江西省地震局, 江西南昌 330039;
2.中国地震局地壳应力研究所(地壳动力学重点实验室), 北京 100085;
3.甘肃省地震局, 甘肃平凉 744000

收稿日期:2019-09-03 出版日期:2020-10-30 发布日期:2020-10-23
通讯作者: 任宏微, 副研究员。 E-mail: renhongweiwei@163.com
作者简介:周红艳(1979-), 女, 河北廊坊人, 工程师, 主要从事地震地下流体氡观测、测氡仪校准和检测工作等。
基金资助:
中国地震局三结合课题(CEA-JC/3JH-171501X); 江西省地震局科技创新团队专项(TD1802); 中国地震局三结合课题(3JH-201902012); 中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH18025Y)

Study on the Influence of Sampling Method on the Calibration Results of Emanometer Measured by Scintillation Chamber in Seismic Observation

ZHOU Hong-yan¹, REN Hong-wei², NING Hong-tao¹, HUANG Ren-gui¹, ZHAO Ying¹, YAO Yu-xia³

1. Earthquake Administration of Jiangxi, Nanchang 330039, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Crustal Dynamics, Institute of Crustal Dynamics, CEA, Beijing 100085, China;
3. Earthquake Administration of Gansu, Pingliang 744000, China

Received:2019-09-03 Online:2020-10-30 Published:2020-10-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用HD-6型多功能自控氡室, 配合国际标准计量仪器AlphaGUARD PQ2000Pro测氡仪, 分别采用循环采样和负压采样两种方式, 对FD-125氡钍分析器的3个闪烁室进行校准实验, 计算3个闪烁室K值和相对固有误差。结果表明: 循环采样方式得到的闪烁室K值比负压采样方式小, 负压采样方式得到的K值偏大, 已经接近《地震水文地球化学观测技术规范》要求的闪烁室K值的极限。循环采样得到的闪烁室相对固有误差≤5%, 达到了《地震水文地球化学观测技术规范》的要求, 而负压采样方式得到的闪烁室相对固有误差>5%, 未达到《地震水文地球化学观测技术规范》的要求; 因此, 循环采样方式更适合地震监测闪烁室法测氡仪的氡室校准。

关键词: 测氡仪, 闪烁室, 循环采样, 负压采样, 氡室

Abstract: Using HD-6 multi-functional automatic radon chamber and the international standard measuring instrument AlphaGUARD PQ2000Pro, cyclic sampling and negative pressure sampling were used to calibrate three scintillation chambers of the FD-125 radon and thorium analyzer. K-values and relative inherent errors of the three scintillation chambers were calculated respectively. The results show that the K-value of scintillation chamber obtained by cyclic sampling method is smaller than that obtained by negative pressure sampling method. The relative inherent error of scintillation chamber obtained by cyclic sampling is less than or equal to 5%, which meets the standard of seismic hydrogeochemistry, while the relative inherent error of scintillation chamber obtained by negative pressure sampling is large than 5%, which does not meet the standard of seismic hydrogeochemistry. The conclusion is that the method of cyclic sampling is more suitable for the calibration of radon chamber of scintillation radon meter in seismic observation.

Key words: Emanometer, Scintillation chamber, Cyclic sampling, Negative pressure sampling, Radon chamber

中图分类号:

P315.7

周红艳, 任宏微, 宁洪涛, 黄仁桂, 赵影, 姚玉霞. 采样方式对地震监测闪烁室法测氡仪校准结果的影响研究[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(4): 191-197.

ZHOU Hong-yan, REN Hong-wei, NING Hong-tao, HUANG Ren-gui, ZHAO Ying, YAO Yu-xia. Study on the Influence of Sampling Method on the Calibration Results of Emanometer Measured by Scintillation Chamber in Seismic Observation[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(4): 191-197.

参考文献

[1] 卢海燕, 张周术, 梁琚成, 等. 闪烁室法测氡仪校准与标定探究[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2012, 33(3): 96-100.
LU Hai-yan, ZHANG Zhou-shu, LIANG Ju-cheng, et al. Study on the correction and calibration of scintillometer for radon measurement[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2012, 33(3): 96-100 (in Chinese).
[2] 任宏微, 姚玉霞, 黄仁桂, 等. 地震监测氡观测仪器校准新方法研究[J]. 地震, 2016, 36(3): 46-54.
REN Hong-wei, YAO Yu-xia, HUANG Ren-gui, et al. A new calibration method of emanometer in earthquake monitoring[J]. Earthquake, 2016, 36(3): 46-54 (in Chinese).
[3] 唐方东, 何林锋. 标准氡室校准测氡仪的原理及方法[J]. 上海计量测试, 2008, 35(3): 26-27.
TANG Fang-dong, HE Lin-feng. Principle and method of calibration for radon detector in standard radon chamber[J]. Shanghai Measurement and Testing, 2008, 35(3): 26-27 (in Chinese).
[4] 张雄杰, 张叶, 瞿金辉, 等. 闪烁室测氡仪采样方式对刻度系数的影响研究[J]. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 37(4): 429-432.
ZHANG Xiong-jie, ZHANG Ye, QU Jin-hui, et al. Impact from sampling methods of scintillation chamber emanometer to calibration coefficient[J]. Journal of East China Institute of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 37(4): 429-432 (in Chinese).
[5] 周红艳, 任宏微. 氡观测技术在地震监测中的应用于发展趋势[J]. 国际地震动态, 2015, (2): 7-14.
ZHOU Hong-yan, REN Hong-wei. Application and development of the radon observation technology in earthquake monitoring[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology, 2015, (2): 7-14 (in Chinese).
[6] 全国电离辐射计量技术委员会. JJG825-2013测氡仪检定规程[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2013.
National Technical Committee for Ionizing Radiation Measurement. JJG825-2013 verification regulation of the radon measuring instrument[S]. Beijing: China Quality Inspection Press, 2013 (in Chinese).
[7] 中国地震局. 地震水文地球化学观测技术规范[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2014.
China Earthquake Administration. Technical code of seismic hydrogeochemistry[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 2014(in Chinese).
[8] 任宏微, 姚玉霞, 周红艳. 测氡仪标准仪器校准法的条件研究[J]. 地震, 2017, 37(3): 148-156.
REN Hong-wei, YAO Yu-xia, ZHOU Hong-yan. Conditions for calibrating emanometer using standard instrument[J]. Earthquake, 2017, 37(3): 148-156 (in Chinese).
[9] 刘耀炜, 任宏微. 汶川8.0级地震氡观测值震后效应特征初步分析[J]. 地震, 2009, 29(1): 121-131.
LIU Yao-wei, REN Hong-wei. Preliminary analysis of the characteristics of post-seismic effect of radon after the Wenchuan 8.0 Earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 2009, 29(1): 121-131 (in Chinese).

采样方式对地震监测闪烁室法测氡仪校准结果的影响研究

Study on the Influence of Sampling Method on the Calibration Results of Emanometer Measured by Scintillation Chamber in Seismic Observation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄仁桂, 赵影, 李雨泽, 汪世先, 罗齐彬, 肖健. 地震氡观测计量溯源初步探究[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(2): 183-190.
[2]	任宏微, 姚玉霞, 周红艳. 测氡仪标准仪器校准法的条件研究[J]. 地震, 2017, 37(3): 148-156.
[3]	任宏微, 姚玉霞, 黄仁桂, 陈兰庆, 王桂清. 地震监测氡观测仪器校准新方法研究[J]. 地震, 2016, 36(3): 46-54.