四川及周边地区TEC异常与印度尼西亚地震关联性研究

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2021.03.012

地震 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 157-170.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2021.03.012

四川及周边地区TEC异常与印度尼西亚地震关联性研究

周煜林, 张学民, 刘静, 熊攀, 欧阳新艳

中国地震局地震预测研究所, 北京 100036

收稿日期:2020-11-19 修回日期:2021-01-25 出版日期:2021-07-31 发布日期:2021-11-02
通讯作者: 张学民, 研究员。 E-mail: zhangxm96@126.com
作者简介:周煜林(1996-), 男, 山东青岛人, 在读硕士研究生, 主要从事电离层建模和地震监测研究。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1503506); 中国地震局地震预测所基本科研业务费专项(2020IEF0510, 2020IEF0705); ISSI-BJ (2019-#33); Dragon-5项目

The Correlation between TEC Anomaly in Sichuan and Surronding Region and Indonesia Earthquakes

ZHOU Yu-lin, ZHANG Xue-min, LIU Jing, XIONG Pan, OUYANG Xin-yan

Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, CEA, Beijing 100036, China

Received:2020-11-19 Revised:2021-01-25 Online:2021-07-31 Published:2021-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用中国地壳运动观测网络和美国喷气动力实验室的GPS TEC数据, 通过滑动四分位法, 对2019年8月2日印度尼西亚苏门答腊岛南部海域6.8级地震进行分析, 研究印度尼西亚地震与四川及周边地区TEC异常的关联性。基于对四川及周边地区以及全球TEC的监测, 我们发现在2019年7月25日(震前一周), 印度尼西亚地震震源区及其北半球的磁共轭区域曾发生不同程度的TEC异常扰动现象。结合2011—2019年四川及周边地区GPS TEC数据与印尼6.0级以上地震目录统计分析发现, 大部分印尼6.0级以上地震会在四川及周边地区出现TEC异常扰动现象。在时间上, 异常集中在震前10 d至震后4 d的范围内, 主要发生在地方时6:00—11:00, 在7:00(LT)和10:00(LT)两个时刻形成两个峰值, 而在夜间出现相关的异常最少; 在空间上, 在四川地区存在TEC异常的印尼强震集中在印尼西侧, 印尼西侧与四川地区TEC异常表现出良好的关联性, 且TEC异常扰动现象面积约为32×10⁴ km², 异常面积巨大, 易于监测。研究结果表明, 四川及周边地区TEC异常与印尼6.0级以上强震具有很好的时空关联性, 结合全球TEC异常分布可以对印尼地区地震监测发挥重要作用。

关键词: TEC, 电离层异常, 印度尼西亚地震, 四川及周边地区

Abstract: Using the GPS TEC data from China Crustal Movement Observation Network and Jet Populsion Laboratry, this paper analyzes the M_S6.8 earthquake in the south of Sumatra island, Indonesia on August 2, 2019 by the sliding quartile method and studies the correlation between the Indonesia earthquake and the TEC anomaly in Sichuan and surrounding region. Through the monitoring of TEC in Sichuan and surronding region and the world, we can clearly found that on July 25, 2019 (one week before the earthquake), TEC anomaly occurred in the epicenter region of Indonesia earthquake and the magnetic conjugate region of the northern hemisphere. Combined with the statistical analysis from 2011 to 2019, it was found that most earthquakes of M_S6.0 and above in Indonesia induced TEC anomalies in the Sichuan and surronding region. In terms of time, the anomalies are concentrated in the 10 days before the earthquake to 4 days after the earthquake, and mainly occur from 6:00 to 11:00 (LT), where two peaks are formed at 7:00 and 10:00, with the less anomalies in the nights; spatially, the strong earthquakes in Indonesia with TEC anomaly in Sichuan area are concentrated in the west of Indonesia, which shows good correlation with TEC anomaly in Sichuan region, the TEC anomalies in the Sichuan region caused by strong Indonesian earthquakes is about 32×10⁴ km² , being huge and easy to monitor. In summary, The TEC anomalies in Sichuan and surrounding region has a significant spatial-temporal correlation with strong earthquakes in Indonesia. Combined with the global TEC anomaly mapping, TEC anomaly analysis in Sichuan region can play an important role for monitoring earthquakes in Indonesia.

Key words: TEC, Ionospheric anomalies, Indonesia earthquake, Sichuan and surrounding region

中图分类号:

P315.7

周煜林, 张学民, 刘静, 熊攀, 欧阳新艳. 四川及周边地区TEC异常与印度尼西亚地震关联性研究[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(3): 157-170.

ZHOU Yu-lin, ZHANG Xue-min, LIU Jing, XIONG Pan, OUYANG Xin-yan. The Correlation between TEC Anomaly in Sichuan and Surronding Region and Indonesia Earthquakes[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2021, 41(3): 157-170.

参考文献

[1] Pulinets S A, Contreras A L, Giraldi G B, et al. Total electron content variations in the ionosphere before the Colima, Mexico, earthquake of 21 January 2003[J]. Geofísica Internacional, 2005, 44(4): 369-377.
[2] Chuo Y J, Chen Y I, Liu J Y, et al. Ionospheric foF2 variations prior to strong earthquakes in Taiwan area[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2001, 27(6/7): 1305-1310.
[3] Liu J Y, Chuo Y J, Shan S J, et al. Pre-earthquake ionospheric anomalies registered by continuous GPS TEC measurements[J]. Annales Geophysicae, 2004, 22(5): 1585-1593.
[4] 张学民, 刘静, 申旭辉, 等. 2005年3月28日苏门答腊8.6级地震前的电离层扰动[J]. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53(3): 567-575.
ZHANG Xue-min, LIU Jing, SHEN Xu-hui, et al. Ionospheric perturbations associated with the M8.6 Sumatra earthquake on 28 March 2005[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(3): 567-575 (in Chinese).
[5] 刘静, 万卫星. 中国6.0级以上地震临震电离层扰动时空分布特征研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(7): 2181-2189.
LIU Jing, WAN Wei-xing. Spatial-temporal distribution of the ionospheric perturbations prior to M_S≥6.0 earthquakes in China main land[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(7): 2181-2189 (in Chinese).
[6] Santis A D, Balasis G, Pavón-Carrasco F J, et al. Potential earthquake precursory pattern from space: The 2015 Nepal event as seen by magnetic Swarm satellites[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2017, 461: 119-126.
[7] Santis A D, Marchetti D, Spogli L, et al. Magnetic field and electron density data analysis from Swarm satellites searching for ionospheric effects by great earthquake: 12 case studies from 2014 to 2016[J]. Atmosphere, 2019, 10(7): 371.
[8] Lister G S, Forster M A. Structural geology and the seismotectonics of the 2004 Great Sumatran earthquake[J]. Tectonics, 2018, 37(11): 4101-4119.
[9] 余涛, 毛田, 王云冈, 等. 汶川特大地震前电离层主要参量变化[J]. 科学通报, 2009, 54(4): 493-499.
YU Tao, MAO Tian, WANG Yun-gang, et al. Study of the ionospheric anomaly before the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54(4): 493-499 (in Chinese).
[10] 宋锐, 刘静, 张学民, 等. 2016年缅甸M7.2地震前中国区域电离层TEC扰动的时空分布[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(3): 95-105.
SONG Rui, LIU Jing, ZHANG Xue-min, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution of ionospheric TEC perturbations in China prior to the 2016 Myanmar M7.2 earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 2019, 39(3): 95-105 (in Chinese).
[11] 刘静, 万卫星, 黄建平, 等. 智利8.8级地震的震前电子浓度扰动[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(11): 2717-2725.
LIU Jing, WAN Wei-xing, HUANG Jian-ping, et al. Electron density perturbation before China M8.8 earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(11): 2717-2725 (in Chinese).
[12] 丁鉴海, 卢振业, 余素荣. 地震地磁学概论[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2011.
DING Jian-hai, LU Zhen-ye, YU Su-rong. A brief treatise on seismomagnetism[M]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2011 (in Chinese).
[13] 徐文耀. 地球电磁现象物理学[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2009.
XU Wen-yao. Physics of electromagnetic phenomena of the earth[M]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2009 (in Chinese).
[14] Piersanti M, Materassi M, Battiston R, et al. Magnetospheric-ionospheric-lithospheric coupling Model. 1: Observations during the 5 August 2018 Bayan earthquake[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(3299).
[15] 祝芙英, 吴云, 林剑, 等. 汶川M_S8.0地震前电离层TEC异常分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2008, 28(6): 16-21.
ZHU Fu-ying, WU Yun, LIN Jian, et al. Study on ionospheric TEC anomaly prior to Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2008, 28(6): 16-21 (in Chinese).
[16] 祝芙英, 吴云, 周义炎, 等. 震前电离层TEC异常扰动统计分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2010(5): 19-23.
ZHU Fu-ying, WU Yun, ZHOU Yi-yan, et al. Statistical analysis of pre-earthquake ionospheric TEC disturbance[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2010(5): 19-23 (in Chinese).
[17] 杨马陵, 邓柏昌, 赵文化, 等. 两次强震前华南地区电离层TEC异常特征研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2009, 29(6): 13-17.
YANG Ma-ling, DENG Bai-chang, ZHAO Wen-hua, et al, Study on abnormal characteristics of ionosphere TEC above South-China responding to two strong earthquakes[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2009, 29(6): 13-17 (in Chinese).
[18] Heinicke J, Koch U, Martinelli G, et al. CO₂ and radon measurements in the Vogtland Area (Germany)-A contribution to earthquake prediction research[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1995, 22(7): 771-774.
[19] Sorokin V M, Yaschenko A K, Hayakawa M. A perturbation of DC electric field caused by light ion adhesion to aerosols during the growth in seismic-related atmospheric radioactivity[J]. Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences, 2007, 7(1): 155-163.
[20] Hatakawa M, Molchanov O A, Team N. Achievements of NASDA’s earthquake remote sensing frontier project[J]. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 2004, 15(3): 311-327.
[21] Kuo C L, Huba J D, Joyce G, et al. Ionosphere plasma bubbles and density variations induced by pre-earthquake rock currents and associated surface charges[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2011, 116, A10317.
[22] 王壮凯, 刘祎, 刘静, 等. 2018年8月5日印度尼西亚地震震前电离层异常特征[J]. 地震学报, 2020, 42(3): 327-340.
WANG Zhuang-kai, LIU Yi, LIU Jing, et al. Characteristics of ionospheric anomalies before the earthquake in Indonisa on August 5, 2018[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2020, 42(3): 327-340 (in Chinese).

四川及周边地区TEC异常与印度尼西亚地震关联性研究

The Correlation between TEC Anomaly in Sichuan and Surronding Region and Indonesia Earthquakes

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	翟笃林, 林剑, 张学民, 宋锐, 熊攀. 2019年四川长宁M_S6.0地震前电离层TEC异常分析[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(3): 171-191.
[2]	张学民, 刘静, 熊攀, 周煜林. 2020年新疆于田6.4级地震前电离层扰动现象分析[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(2): 145-157.
[3]	宋锐, 刘静, 张学民, 何建辉. 2016年缅甸M7.2地震前中国区域电离层TEC扰动的时空分布[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(3): 95-105.
[4]	翟笃林, 张学民, 熊攀, 宋锐. Prophet时序预测模型在电离层TEC异常探测中的应用[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(2): 46-62.
[5]	宋程, 张永仙, 夏彩韵, 张小涛. 2008年汶川M_S8.0地震电离层图像信息长时程演化初探[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(2): 135-146.
[6]	何建辉,张学民,林剑,王敏,申旭辉. 汶川地震同震电离层扰动研究[J]. 地震, 2017, 37(2): 126-134.
[7]	姚璐, 申旭辉, 张学民. 玉树M_s7.1地震前电离层异常扰动分析[J]. 地震, 2014, 34(3): 74-85.
[8]	蔡华, 孙汉荣, 李子申. 利用陆态网络实时监测电离层TEC及在地震监测中的应用分析[J]. 地震, 2014, 34(1): 41-48.
[9]	徐桃玲, 金红林, 郭鹏. 日本M_W9.0地震前电离层异常初步分析[J]. 地震, 2012, 32(4): 131-139.
[10]	马新欣, 金红林, 孟国杰. 利用地基GPS观测数据研究与地震有关的电离层异常[J]. 地震, 2008, 28(4): 80-90.