欢迎访问《地震》,

地震 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 181-196.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2022.01.014

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中国大陆7级以上地震频次场时空异常特征

罗国富1, 屠泓为2, 丁风和1, 马禾青1, 杨明芝1   

  1. 1.宁夏回族自治区地震局, 宁夏 银川 750001;
    2.青海省地震局, 青海 西宁 810001
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-20 修回日期:2021-02-08 发布日期:2022-09-08
  • 作者简介:罗国富(1975-), 男, 山西沁源人, 高级工程师, 主要从事地震预报及相关研究。
  • 基金资助:
    地震科技星火计划攻关项目(XH18052); 宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划重大(重点)项目(2018BFG02011)

Spatio-temporal Anomalies of the Seismic Frequency Field above M7 Earthquakes in Chinese Mainland

LUO Guo-fu1, TU Hong-wei2, DING Feng-he1, MA He-qing1, YANG Ming-zhi1   

  1. 1. Earthquake Administration of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan 750001, China;
    2. Earthquake Agency of Qinghai province, Xining 810001, China
  • Received:2020-10-20 Revised:2021-02-08 Published:2022-09-08

摘要: 本文以地震频次作为地震活动的变量, 通过自然正交函数展开方法, 计算中国大陆7级以上强震前的地震活动频次场, 提取出强震前时间因子和空间等值线的异常。 结果表明, 强震前时间因子出现超过均方差的高值或低值异常, 异常多数分布在频次场的前4个典型场, 具有多分量特点, 第1个典型场异常贡献率最大(占总场40%~60%), 绝大部分强震前5~8年出现长期异常, 部分强震前1~2年出现中期异常, 少数强震前3月出现短临异常的特征。 区域频次等值线出现的高梯度旋涡区域是异常危险区, 等值线值大于0.9且具有活动构造的危险区往往是强震的发震位置。 另外, 地震频次场与传统方法的区域地震活动频次(3月)震例对比, 表明频次场时间因子异常具有自己的独特优越性和缺陷, 并讨论了这些方法的差异性。

关键词: 7级以上强震, 地震频次场, 时间因子, 等值线

Abstract: In the paper, seismic frequency are taken as the indications of the seismicity before strong earthquakes above M7, which are calculated by means of the natural orthogonal function expansion method, and the abnormal change of time and space factor are extracted before the strong earthquakes. Results show that, before the strong earthquake, the time factor has a high or low value anomalies exceeding mean square error, most abnormal distributes in the first four typical frequency fields, showing the characteristics of multi-components. Amorry of them, the first typical field anomalies is most contribution (generally 40%~60%). Before strong earthquakes, mose cases have long-term anomalies in 5~8 years, some cases have medium-term anomalies in 1~2 years, and a few cases have short-term or imminent anomalies. The area with high gradient vortex in frequency contours in the abnormal region, in which the area with isoline value greater than 0.9 and overlaping with activce tectonics indicates the possible position for future mainshock. In addition, the comparison between the frequency field and the 3 months frequency by the traditional seismic method shows that the time factor anomaly of the frequency field has its own unique advantages and disadvantages, the differences of these methods have been discussed.

Key words: Strong earthquakes above M7, The seismic frequency field, Time factor, Contour map

中图分类号: