高压直流输电对大柏舍台地电场观测干扰的分析

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2020.01.011

地震 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 140-150.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2020.01.011

高压直流输电对大柏舍台地电场观测干扰的分析

张波¹, 谭大诚^2,3, 罗娜¹, 尹小兵¹, 吴鹤帅¹

1.河北省地震局红山基准台, 河北邢台 054000;
2.中国地震局兰州地震研究所, 甘肃兰州 730000;
3.甘肃省地震局, 甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2018-11-27 出版日期:2020-01-31 发布日期:2020-01-20
作者简介:张波(1983-), 男, 河北邢台人, 工程师, 主要从事地震地电观测与研究。
基金资助:
河北省地震局地震科技星火计划青年项目(DZ20180320016)

Interference Analysis of HVDC Transmission to Electric Field Observation of Dabaishe Station

ZHANG Bo¹, TAN Da-cheng^2,3, LUO Na¹, YIN Xiao-bing, WU He-shuai

1.Hongshan base station, Hebei Seismological Bureau, Hebei Xingtai 054000, China;
2.Lanzhou Earthquake Research Institute, China Earthquake Administration, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
3.Gansu Seismological Bureau, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2018-11-27 Online:2020-01-31 Published:2020-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在分析高压直流输电对地电场观测产生干扰原因的基础上, 应用大柏舍台近年来受高压直流输电干扰的地电场数据分析受高压直流干扰时的地电场变化、入地电流、换流站接地极与台址关系, 计算了高压直流输电干扰时台址岩体裂隙优势方位。结果表明: 地电场变化形态仅在高压输电入地电流开始注入和停止注入时产生大幅度的跃变; 高压直流输电干扰时电场强度与入地电流大小成正比, 与台址到换流站接地极的距离的平方成反比; 应用地电场潮汐变化前10阶谐波振幅计算台址岩体裂隙优势方位的方法有甄别高压直流输电干扰的效果。

关键词: 高压直流输电, 地电场观测, 岩体裂隙优势方位α角

Abstract: Based on the analysis of the cause of interference caused by HVDC transmission to geoelectric field observation, the changes of geoelectric field, earth-fault current and the relationship between the ground electrode of the converter station and station location were analyzed by geoelectric field data of Dabaishe station disturbed by HVDC transmission in recent years. Meanwhile, the dominant orientation of rock fracture of site of geoelectric field interfered by HVDC was calculated. The results showed that the morphology of geoelectric field only changes dramatically when high voltage transmission earth-fault current begins to inject and stops injecting.The electric field intensity was proportional to the earth-fault current and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the station location to the ground electrode of the converter station when HVDC transmission was interfered.The method calculating the dominant orientation of rock fracture of station location can discriminators effect HVDC interference by first 10 order harmonic amplitudes of tidal changes in geoelectric field.

Key words: HVDC transmission, Geoelectric field observation, Fracture dominant azimuth α of rock mass

中图分类号:

P315.7

张波, 谭大诚, 罗娜, 尹小兵, 吴鹤帅. 高压直流输电对大柏舍台地电场观测干扰的分析[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(1): 140-150.

ZHANG Bo, TAN Da-cheng, LUO Na, YIN Xiao-bing, WU He-shuai. Interference Analysis of HVDC Transmission to Electric Field Observation of Dabaishe Station[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(1): 140-150.

参考文献

[1] 中国地震台网中心. 我国数字地震台网建设与发展[EB/OL]. [2013-12-02].
China Seismic Network Center. Construction and development of digital seismic network in China[EB/OL]. [2013-12-02] (in Chinese).
[2] 方炜, 张国强, 邵辉成, 等. 高压直流输电对地电场观测的影响[J]. 地震地质, 2010, 32(3): 434-437.
FANG Wei, ZHANG Guo-qiang, SHAO Hui-cheng, et al. Study on the impact of HVDC togeoelectric field observation[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2010, 32(3): 434-437 (in Chinese).
[3] 马钦忠, 李伟, 赵文舟, 等. 人工源地电场空间变化区域性特征[J]. 地震学报, 2017, 39(4): 455-468.
MA Qin-zhong, LI Wei, ZHAO Wen-zhou, et al. Regional characteristics of artificial source geoelectric field spatial variations[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2017, 39(4): 455-468 (in Chinese).
[4] 谭大诚, 赵家骝, 席继楼, 等. 潮汐地电场特征及机理研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53(3): 544-555.
TAN Da-cheng, ZHAO Jia-liu, XI Ji-lou, et al. A study on feature and mechanism of the tidal geoelectrical field[J]. Chinese J. Geophys, 2010, 53(3): 544-555 (in Chinese).
[5] 谭大诚, 王兰炜, 赵家骝, 等.潮汐地电场谐波和各向波形的影响要素[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(7): 1842-1853.
TAN Da-cheng, WANG Lan-wei, ZHAO Jia-liu, et al. Influence factors of harmonic waves and directional waveforms of tidal geoelectrical filed[J]. Chinese J. Geophys, 2011, 54(7): 1842-1853 (in Chinese).
[6] 谭大诚, 席继楼, 张慧, 等. 地电场水文地质因素及裂隙水主体渗流方向逐日计算[J]. 地震学报, 2013, 35(1): 36-49.
TAN Da-cheng, XI Ji-lou, ZHANG Hui, et al. Hydrogeologic factors of geoelectric filed and diurnal computation of preferred orientation of crack water seepage[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2013, 35(1): 36-49 (in Chinese).
[7] 谭大诚, 赵家骝, 刘小凤, 等. 自然电场的区域性变化特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(5): 1588-1598.
TAN Da-cheng, ZHAO Jia-liu, LIU Xiao-feng, et al. Features of regional variations of the spontaneous filed[J]. Chinese J. Geophys, 2014, 57(5): 1588-1598 (in Chinese).
[8] 孙正江, 王华俊. 地电概论[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1984.
SUN Zheng-jiang, WANG Hua-jun. Introduction to geoelectricity[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1984 (in Chinese).
[9] 谭大诚, 赵家骝, 席继楼, 等. 青藏高原中强地震前的地电场变异及结构解析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(3): 875-885.
TAN Da-cheng, ZHAO Jia-liu, XI Ji-lou, et al. The variation of waveform and analysis of composition for the geoelectrical field before maderate or strong earthquakes in Qinghai-Tibetan plateau regions[J]. Chinese J.Geophys, 2012, 55(3): 875-885 (in Chinese).
[10] 董海龙, 蒋延林, 张秀霞, 等. 哈密—郑州高压直流输电对地磁场观测的影响分析[J]. 甘肃科技, 2015, 31(24): 57-58.
DONG Hai-long, JIANG Yan-lin, ZHANG Xiu-xia, et al. Analysis of the influence of HV DC transmission on geomagnetic observation[J]. Gansu Science and Technology, 2015, 31(24): 57-58 (in Chinese).
[11] 赵畹君. 高压直流工程技术[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2004.
ZHAO Wan-jun . HVDC engineering technology[M]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2004 (in Chinese).
[12] 邬雄, 万保权. 输变电工程的电磁环境[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2009.
WU Xiong, WAN Bao-quan . Electromagnetic environment of power transmission and transformation engineering[M]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2009 (in Chinese).
[13] 唐波, 张小武, 葛光祖, 等.特高压直流输电线路与接地极对地电场观测的干扰[J]. 高压技术, 2013, 39(12): 2951-2957.
TANG Bo, ZHANG Xiao-wu, GE Guang-zu, et al. Disturbance of UHVDC transmission line and grounding pole on geoelectric field observation[J]. High pressure technology, 2013, 39(12): 2951-2957 (in Chinese).

高压直流输电对大柏舍台地电场观测干扰的分析

Interference Analysis of HVDC Transmission to Electric Field Observation of Dabaishe Station

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	席继楼, 关华平, 刘超, 庄楠, 武建华, 颜晓晔. 几次大地震前后地电场中长期变化分析与研究[J]. 地震, 2018, 38(2): 117-126.
[2]	胡小静,毕青,付虹. 大地电场观测中干扰变化的特征分析[J]. 地震, 2017, 37(2): 157-166.