欢迎访问《地震》,

地震 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 32-46.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2025.01.003

• • 上一篇    下一篇

2021年德保MS4.8地震前第二类地脉动信号异常特征和效能评估

黄惠宁1, 韦进2, 谢夜玉1, 原永东1, 朱土凤1, 梁飞1, 苏珊1   

  1. 1.广西壮族自治区地震局, 广西 南宁 530022;
    2.中国地震局地震大地测量重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-03 接受日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2025-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 韦进, 副研究员。 E-mail: pierce212@163.com
  • 作者简介:黄惠宁(1985-), 女, 广西南宁人, 工程师, 主要从事地壳形变观测数据分析与地震预测研究。E-mail: lingbing226@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广西科技攻关计划项目(1377002, 14124004-4-8); 地震科技星火计划项目(XH23026C); 2023年度震情跟踪定向工作任务(2023010208); 科技基础资源调查专项资助(2023FY101500)

Anomaly Characteristics and Effectiveness Evaluation of the DF Microseism Signals before the 2021 Debao MS4.8 Earthquake

HUANG Hui-ning1, WEI Jin2, XIE Ye-yu1, YUAN Yong-dong1, ZHU Tu-feng1, LIANG Fei1, SU Shan1   

  1. 1. Earthquake Agency of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530022, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Geodesy, China Earthquake Administration, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2021-09-03 Accepted:2024-06-20 Published:2025-04-15

摘要: 继2019年广西靖西MS5.2地震后, 2021年8月4日广西西部又发生了德保MS4.8地震。 为研究此次广西西部地震活动增强现象, 并判断震前是否存在与地震有关的异常变化, 本文利用R值评分法对凭祥台的DF脉动信号垂直位移及月极值速率绝对值进行异常特征分析和预报效能评估。 结果表明: 距凭祥台400 km范围内的MS4.0以上地震较易发生在每年台风频发、 垂直位移较高的年周期内, 而短期内则易发生在垂直位移从低值转为高值的过程中, 2021年德保MS4.8地震就发生在垂直位移从低值0.1×10-6 m缓慢上升至0.15×10-6 m的过程中。 年尺度预测效能结果显示, 当月速率阈值S0为0.00039×10-6 m/月时, 预报效能评估最优值RM为0.29, 2021年德保MS4.8地震前异常持续时长8个月, 与R值检验方法的最优预报时长6个月相当。 在讨论R值随震例积累规律时发现, 新的震例可改进最优预报策略, 阈值逐步收敛至0.00039×10-6 m/月~0.00031×10-6 m/月, 预报有效时长逐步收敛至6~10个月的情况下, R值也逐步收敛至0.29~0.31。 与广西地区其他gPhone重力台对比发现, 2021年德保MS4.8地震时, 凭祥台震前短期垂直位移变大的原因与台风激发的DF脉动信号增强有关, 并且当台风路径与海岸线呈正交关系时, 发生地震的可能性较高。 本研究可为预测未来广西西部MS4.0以上地震发生时段提供经验和参考。

关键词: gPhone重力仪, DF地脉动信号异常, 2021年德保MS4.8地震, 预报效能评估

Abstract: Following the 2019 Jingxi MS5.2 earthquake in Guangxi, the Debao MS4.8 earthquake occurred in western Guangxi on August 4, 2021. To investigate the enhancement of seismicity in western Guangxi and determine whether there were any abnormal changes related to the earthquake before it occurred. In this paper, the R-value scoring method is used to analyze the abnormal characteristics and evaluate the prediction efficiency of the vertical displacement of the DF microseism signals and the absolute value of the monthly extreme rate at Pingxiang station. The results show that earthquakes with magnitudes greater than MS4.0 within a 400 km radius of the Pingxiang station are more likely to occur during periods of high vertical displacement, which frequently coincide with typhoon seasons. These earthquakes are also likely to occur during the transition from low to high vertical displacement values. The 2021 Debao MS4.8 earthquake occurred during a period when vertical displacement gradually increased from a low value of 0.1×10-6 m to 0.15×10-6 m. The results of annual scale prediction efficiency show that, with a monthly rate threshold (S0) of 0.00039×10-6 m per month, the optimal value (RM) was 0.29. The duration of anomalies before the 2021 Debao earthquake lasted 8 months, comparable to the optimal prediction duration of 6 months as determined by the R-value evaluation method. When discussing the accumulation pattern of the R-value with the accumulation of seismic cases, it was found that new seismic cases can improve the optimal prediction strategy, with the threshold gradually converging to 0.00039×10-6 m per month~0.00031×10-6 m per month, the optimal forecast duration gradually converging to 6~10 months, and the R-value gradually converging to 0.29~0.31. Comparing with other gPhone gravity stations in Guangxi, it was found that during the 2021 Debao MS4.8 earthquake, the short-term increase in vertical displacement at Pingxiang station before the earthquake was related to the enhancement of DF pulsation signals excited by the typhoon. The possibility of earthquakes was high when the typhoon path was orthogonal to the coastline of China. This study provides empirical insights and references for predicting the occurrence period of MS4.0 and above earthquakes in western Guangxi in the future.

Key words: gPhone gravimeter, Anomalies of the DF microseism signals, The 2021 Debao MS4.8 earthquake, Prediction effectiveness evaluation

中图分类号: