利用帕金森矢量检测2019年长宁6.0级地震的地磁场变化

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2020.02.007

Abstract

Abstract: Seismo-magnetic anomalies induced from the existence of current and/or high-conductivity materials have been widely reported. The Parkinson vectors derived from geomagnetic data at 3 stations were obtained via the magnetic transfer function and discussed with respect to the location (104.9°E, 28.34°N) and the depth (19 km) of the Changning earthquake on June 17, 2019 in Sichuan province. Azimuth distribution constructed from the entire Parkinson vectors during the observation period is utilized to estimate the persistent background (i.e., underlying inhomogeneous tectonic structures) at each station. The normalized background distribution is subtracted from the normalized monitoring distributions computed using the azimuths of the Parkinson vectors within a 15-day moving window to determine the anomalous azimuths of high-conductivity materials. The analytical results show that high-conductivity materials appeared before 1~2 week and in areas about 15 km away from the epicenter reported by the China earthquake networks center.

Key words: Changning 6.0 earthquake, Seismo-magnetic anomalies, Parkinson vector, Geomagnetic induction vectors

CLC Number:

P315.7

AISA Yisimayili, CHEN Jie-hong, MAO Zhi-qiang. Using Parkinson Vector Analysis to Detect the Geomagnetic Changes in the Sichuan Changning 6.0 Earthquakesof June 17, 2019[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(2): 91-99.

References

[1] Parkinson W D. Directions of Rapid Geomagnetic Fluctuations[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1959, 2(1): 1-14.
[2] 尹祥础, 尹灿. 非线性系统失稳的前兆与地震预报响应比理论及其应用[J]. 中国科学B辑, 1991, 21(5): 512-518.
YIN Xiang-chu, YIN Can. The precursor of collapsing nonlinear system and earthquake prediction: the theory and application of response ratio[J]. Science China B, 1991, 21(5): 512-518 (in Chinese).
[3] 龚绍京, 陈化然, 张翠芬, 等. 地磁水平场转换函数在唐山地震前的异常反应[J]. 地震学报, 1997, 19(1): 51-58.
GONG Shao-jing, CHEN Hua-ran, ZHANG Cui-fen, et al. Geomagnetic Horizontal Field Transfer Functions in the Abnormal Reaction before Tangshan Earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1997, 19(1): 51-58 (in Chinese).
[4] 冯志生, 王建宇, 蒋延林, 等. 地磁垂直分量日变幅逐日比及其与地震关系的探讨[J]. 华南地震, 2001, 21(2): 20-27.
FENG Zhi-sheng, WANG Jian-yu, JIANG Yan-lin, et al. Ratio of daily variation amplitude of geomagnetic vertical component and its relation with earthquake[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 2001, 21(2): 20-27 (in Chinese).
[5] 冯志生, 梅卫萍, 张秀霞, 等. 中强震前地磁谐波振幅比的趋势性变化特征初步研究[J]. 西北地震学报, 2004, 26(1): 50-56.
FENG Zhi-sheng, MEI Wei-ping, ZHANG Xiu-xia, et al. Preliminary study on the characteristics of long and medium term variation for the amplitude radio of geomagnetic humorous wave before moderate-strong earthquakes[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 2004, 26(1): 50-56 (in Chinese).
[6] 丁鉴海, 车时, 余素荣, 等. 地磁日变地震预报方法及其震例研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2009: 1-3.
DING Jian-hai, CHE Shi, YU Su-rong, et al. The earthquake prediction method of geomagnetic diurnal variation and its earthquake cases study[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 2009, 1-3 (in Chinese).
[7] 戴勇, 高立新, 姚丽, 等. 2013年岷县—漳县6.6级地震地磁垂直分量日变化低点时间空间分布特征[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(3): 106-114.
DAI Yong, GAO Li-xin, YAO Li, et al. Low-point time spatial distribution characteristics of geomagnetic vertical component diurnal variation before the 2013 M6.6 Minxian-Zhangxian earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 2019, 39(3): 106-114 (in Chinese).
[8] 倪晓寅, 赖见深, 朱培育. 汶川8.0级地震前地磁日变化异常综合分析[J]. 中国地震, 2019, 35(1): 65-75.
NI Xiao-yin, LAI Jian-shen, ZHU Pei-yu. Comprehensive analysis on geomagnetic diurnal variation anomalies before the Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake by multiple methods[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2019, 35(1): 65-75 (in Chinese).
[9] 王桥, 黄清华, 等. 华北地磁感应矢量时空特征分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2016, 59(1): 215-228, doi:10.6038/cjg20160118.
WANG Qiao, HUANG Qing-hua. The spatio-temporal characteristics of geomagnetic induction vectors in North China[J]. Chinese J. Geophys, 2016, 59(1): 215-228 (in Chinese).
[10] 龚绍京. 广东省地磁台的帕金森矢量及广州台的系数在河源地震前后的时间变化[J]. 地震研究, 1987, 10(5): 575-582.
GONG Shao-Jin. Parkinson vectors at the geomagnetic stations in Guangdong Province and the time-dependent changes of their ratio at Guangzhou station both before and after the Heyuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 1987, 10(5): 575-582 (in Chinese).
[11] 于明鑫, 曾小苹, 董玉兰, 等. 大连地磁短周期变化特征的初步研究[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 1990, (6): 35-41+21.
YU Ming-xin, ZENG Xiao-ping, DONG Yu-lan, et al. Preliminary study on characteristics of short-period geomagnetic changes in Dalian[J]. 1990, (6): 35-41+21 (in Chinese).
[12] 曾小苹, 林云芳, 朱忠杰, 等. 用地磁转换函数研究震源区介质的电性变化[J]. 地震学报, 1995, (3): 335-339.
ZENG Xiao-ping, LIN Yun-fang, ZHU Zhong-jie, et al. Using geomagnetic transfer function to study electrical changes of media in source region[J]. 1995, (3): 335-339 (in Chinese).
[13] 李琪, 杨冬梅, 张素琴, 等. 地磁转换函数方法之典型震例及数模对比[J]. 地震, 2005, (3): 85-90.
LI Qi, YANG Dong-mei, ZHANG Su-qin, et al. Typical example and comparison between digital data and simulated data of geomagnetic transfer function[J]. Earthquake, 2005, (3): 85-90 (in Chinese).
[14] Chen C H, et al. Evaluation of seismo-electric anomalies using magnetic data in Taiwan[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 13(3): 597-604.
[15] Chen C H, et al. Evaluating the March 27, 2013 M6.2 earthquake hypocenter using momentary high-conductivity materials[J]. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 2015, 26(1): 1-9.
[16] 易桂喜, 龙锋, 梁明剑, 等. 2019年6月17日四川长宁M_S6.0地震序列震源机制解与发震构造分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2019, 62(9): 3432-3447.
YI Gui-xi, LONG Feng, LIANG Ming-Jian, et al. Focal mechanism solutions and seismogenic structure of the 17 June 2019 M_S6.0 Sichuan Changning earthquake sequence[J]. Chinese J. Geophys, 2019, 62(9): 3432-3447 (in Chinese).
[17] 储贻晟. 日本地区地震前电导率异常研究[D]. 国立中正大学, 2017.
CHU Yi-sheng. The seismo-conductivity anomalies in Japan[D]. National Chung Cheng University, 2017.
[18] 张国民, 傅征祥, 桂燮泰. 地震预报引论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001, 357-362.
ZHANG Guo-min, FU Zheng-xiang, GUI Xie-tai, et al. Introduction to earthquake prediction[M]. Beijing: Science press, 2001, 357-362 (in Chinese).

Using Parkinson Vector Analysis to Detect the Geomagnetic Changes in the Sichuan Changning 6.0 Earthquakesof June 17, 2019

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	GUAN Zhao-xuan, WAN Yong-ge, ZHOU Ming-yue, WANG Run-yan, SONG Ze-yao, HUANG Shao-hua, GU Pei-yuan. Seismogenic Fault Plane and Geodynamic Discussion of the 2024 Wushi M_S7.1 Earthquake, Xinjiang, China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 1-11.
[2]	LI Yue, LIU Zhen-hui, MA Han-yu, WANG Yi-xi, SHAO Yong-xin. Permeability Changes of Tianjin Typical Observation Wells and Coseismic Response Mechanism to Maduo M_S7.4 Earthquake [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 33-51.
[3]	JING Tao, Boonphor Phetphouthongdy, Chansouk Sioudom, LIU Yang-yang, LI Ji-geng, KANG Chun-li, MA Wei-yu. Analysis of Outgoing Longwave Radiation Changes before and after the Dengta M_S5.1 Earthquake Based on Tidal Additional Tectonic Stress [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 52-62.
[4]	YANG Yan-ming, SU Shu-juan, WANG Lei. Determination of Rupture Direction and Seismogenic Structure of the 2020 Heerlinger M_L4.5 Earthquake in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 63-85.
[5]	WANG Ting-ting, BIAN Yin-ju, REN Meng-yi, YANG Qian-li, HOU Xiao-lin. Seismic Event Recognition Software [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 104-119.
[6]	SONG Cheng, ZHANG Yong-xian, XIA Cai-yun, BI Jin-meng, ZHANG Xiao-tao, WU Yong-jia, XU Xiao-yuan. Retrospective Study on the Forecasting of the Three M_S≥5.0 Earthquakes Since 2019 in North China Based on PI Method [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 120-134.
[7]	LIU Jun-qing, ZHANG Xiao-gang, ZHANG Yu, CAI Hong-lei, CHEN Zhuo, BAO Xiu-min. Study of Seismic Moment Tensor Inversion by Multi-point Sources for Jishishan M_S6.2 Earthquake on December 18, 2023, in Gansu Province, China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 169-177.
[8]	HUANG Feng, XIONG Ren-wei, LIN Jing-dong, ZHAO Zheng, YANG Pan-xin. Geomorphic Index and Activity Characteristics of the Mid-Segment of Jiali Fault [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 1-18.
[9]	SHU Tian-tian, LUO Yan, ZHU Yin-jie. The Source Rupture Process and the Strong Ground Motion Estimation of the 2022 M_S6.8 Earthquake in Luding, Sichuan [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 19-36.
[10]	WU Xu, XUE Bing, LI Jiang, ZHU Xiao-yi, ZHANG Bing, HUANG Shi. Design and Implementation of Borehole Comprehensive Observation Timing System [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 37-49.
[11]	BO Wan-ju, ZHANG Li-cheng, SU Guo-ying, XU Dong-zhuo, ZHAO Li-jun. Thoughts on Monitoring and Forecasting Methods of Strong Earthquake with Crust Deformation Data [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 64-77.
[12]	YUE Xiao-yuan, LI Yan-e, ZHONG Shi-jun, WANG Wei, WANG Yan, MA Liang. Anormalies of b-value Changes before M≥4.0 Earthquake in Tangshan Old Seismic Region [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 94-108.
[13]	JIA Xin-ye, BAI Shao-qi, JIA Yan-jie, LIU Fang, NA Re. Study on Lg Wave Attenuation and Site Response Characteristics in Central and Western of Inner Mongolia, China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 109-117.
[14]	CHEN Guang-qi, WU Yan-qiang, XIA Ming-yao, LI Zhi-yuan. The Japan Noto Peninsula M7.6 Earthquake on January 1, 2024: Focal Characteristics, Disaster Situation and Emergency Response [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 141-152.
[15]	YANG Pan-xin, XIONG Ren-wei, HU Chao-zhong, GAO Yuan. Preliminary Analysis of the Seismogenic Tectonics for the 2023 Jishishan M_S6.2 Earthquake in Gansu Province [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 153-159.