锦屏一级水库蓄水前后地震活动、 震源机制及应力场研究

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2023.03.009

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, we studied seismicity and relocated earthquakes with M_L≥0.5 occurring in the Jinping reservoir and its surrounding area before and after the impoundment. Then we inversed the mechanism solutions of 71 M_L≥3.0 earthquakes occurred the stress field before and after impoundment. The initial response time of the earthquake Jinping Level Ⅰ Reservoir in the was relatively long, which should be related to the lack of coverage of the flooding area near the earthquake swarm. After expanding to Hulugou, seismicity increases sharply, the changes of seismicity in the following stages have good relationship with the impoundment process. After the impoundment, a large number of earthquakes concentrated near Hulugou in Tibetan Autonomous County of Muli, with focal depths ranging from 6 to 14 km, which became shallower compared to the focal depths before the impoundment. Except for the results of focal mechanism solutions in the Hulugou, P-axis and T-axis distribution, regional stress field except for Hulugou are consistent with previous research results. The focal mechanisms of the earthquake near Hulugou are mostly strike type, with the P-axis mainly in the NS and NNW-SSE directions, and the T-axis mainly in the EW and NEE-SWW directions. The maximum and minimum principal stress axes of the regional stress field are nearly horizontal, and the intermediate stress axis is nearly vertical, the R-value is 0.5, different from other regions. We infer that their mechanisms should be influenced by pore pressure diffusion and infiltration weakening.

Key words: Jinping Ⅰ reservoir, seismicity, Focal mechanism, Stress field inversion, R-value

CLC Number:

P315.3

CHEN Han-lin, LIU Rui-feng, WANG Qin-cai. Seismic Activity, Focal Mechanism Solution and Stress Field in the Jinping Ⅰ Reservoir and Its Surrounding Area before and after Impoundment[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(3): 120-137.

References

[1] 朱诗鳌. 水库诱发地震历史观[J]. 水电与新能源, 2010(4): 74-78.
ZHU Shi-ao. Reservoir induced earthquakes from the point of view of history[J]. Hydropower and New Energy, 2010(4): 74-78 (in Chinese).
[2] Roeloffs A E. Fault stability changes induced beneath a reservoir with cyclic variations in water level[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1988, 93(B3): 2107-2124.
[3] Simpson D W, Leith W S, Scholz C H. Two types of reservoir-induced seismicity[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1988, 78(6): 2025-2040.
[4]Talwani P, Acree S. Pore press diffusion and the mechanism of reservoir-induced seismicity[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1984, 122(6): 947-965.
[5] 丁原章, 常宝琦, 肖安予, 等. 水库诱发地震[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1989.
DING Yuan-zhang, CHANG Bao-qi, XIAO An-yu, et al. The reservoir induced earthquake[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1989 (in Chinese).
[6] 杨晓源. 中国近年水库地震监测综述[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 1999, 20(2): 3-15.
YANG Xiao-yuan. Summary of recent survey about reservoir induced earthquakes in our country[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 1999, 20(2): 3-15 (in Chinese).
[7] 马文涛, 蔺永, 苑京立, 等. 水库诱发地震的震例比较与分析[J]. 地震地质, 2013, 35(4): 914-929.
MA Wen-tao, LIN Yong, YUAN Jing-li, et al. Comparison and analysis on the basic features of reservoir-induced seismicity[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2013, 35(4): 914-929 (in Chinese).
[8] 蔡一川, 戴仕贵, 魏娅玲. 四川木里小震群活动特征研究[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2015, 10(4): 933-940.
CAI Yi-chuan, DAI Shi-gui, WEI Ya-ling. The active characteristics of small earthquake swarms in the Muli area of Sichuan Province[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2015, 10(4): 933-940 (in Chinese).
[9] 邵玉平, 高原, 戴仕贵, 等. 四川锦屏水库地区地壳剪切波分裂特征及蓄水影响初探[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(12): 4557-4568.
SHAO Yu-ping, GAO Yuan, DAI Shi-gui, et al. Seismic shear-wave splitting characteristics in the crust in the area of Jinping reservoir of Sichuan and influences from water impoundment[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60(12): 4557-4568 (in Chinese).
[10] 杜瑶, 邵玉平, 阮祥, 等. 雅砻江锦屏一级水电站库区蓄水后波速比变化研究[J]. 华南地震, 2020, 40(3): 34-43.
DU Yao, SHAO Yu-ping, RUAN Xiang, et al. Study on the variation of wave velocity ratio of Yalong river Jinping level Ⅰ hydropower station after retaining water at the reservoir area[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 2020, 40(3): 34-43 (in Chinese).
[11] 向宏发, 徐锡伟, 虢顺民, 等. 丽江—小金河断裂第四纪以来的左旋逆推运动及其构造地质意义陆内活动地块横向构造的屏蔽作用[J]. 地震地质, 2002, 24(2): 188-198.
XIANG Hong-fa, XU Xi-wei, GUO Shun-min, et al. Sinistral thrusting along the Lijiang-Xiaojiang fault since quaternary and its geologic-tectonic significance: Shielding effect of transverse structure of intracontinental active block[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2002, 24(2): 188-198 (in Chinese).
[12] 徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 郑荣章, 等. 川滇地区活动块体最新构造变动样式及其动力来源[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2003, 33(S1): 151-162.
XU Xi-wei, WEN Xue-ze, ZHENG Rong-zhang, et al. The latest tectonic change patterns and power sources of active blocks in Sichuan-Yunnan area[J]. Science in China (Series D), 2003, 33(S1): 151-162 (in Chinese).
[13] 徐锡伟, 吴熙彦, 于贵华, 等. 中国大陆高震级地震危险区判定的地震地质学标志及其应用[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(2): 219-275.
XU Xi-wei, WU Xi-yan, YU Gui-hua, et al. Seismo-geological signatures for identifying M≥7.0 earthquake risk areas and their premilimary application in mainland China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2017, 39(2): 219-275 (in Chinese).
[14] 李安, 张世民, 丁锐, 等. 丽江—小金河断裂南段全新世古地震研究[C]. 地壳构造与地壳应力文集, 2016(1): 1-9.
LI An, ZHANG Shi-min, DING Rui, et al. A paleoseismic research of the south segment of the Lijiang-Xiaojinhe fault in the Holocene[C]. Bulletin of the Institute of Crustal Dynamics, 2016(1): 1-9 (in Chinese).
[15] 丁锐, 任俊杰, 张世民, 等. 丽江—小金河断裂中段晚第四纪古地震历史[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(3): 622-640.
DING Rui, REN Jun-jie, ZHANG Shi-min, et al. Late quaternary paleoearthquakes on the middle segment of the Lijiang-Xiaojinhe fault, Southeastern Tibet[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2018, 40(3): 622-640 (in Chinese).
[16] 史翔宇, 王晓青, 邱玉荣, 等. 川滇地震科学实验场地震目录最小完整性震级分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2020, 63(10): 3683-3697.
SHI Xiang-yu, WANG Xiao-qing, QIU Yu-rong, et al. Analysis of the minimum magnitude of completeness for earthquake catalog in China Seismic Experimental Site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2020, 63(10): 3683-3697 (in Chinese).
[17]丁义, 蹇德平, 丁金涛, 等. 锦屏一级水电站蓄水期流量预报与水库实时调度[J]. 人民长江, 2015, 46(S1): 38-41.
DING Yi, JIAN De-ping, DING Jin-tao, et al. Flow forecast and reservoir real-time operation of Jinping Ⅰ hydropower station during impounding periods[J]. Yangtze River, 2015, 46(S1): 38-41 (in Chinese).
[18] Waldhauser F, Ellsworth W L. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2000, 90(6): 1353-1368.
[19] Wang C Y, Chan W W, Mooney W D. Three-dimensional velocity structure of crust and upper mantle in southwestern China and its tectonic implications[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2003, 108(B9): 2442.
[20] Herrmann R B, Benz H, Ammon C J. Monitoring the earthquake source process in North America[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2011, 101(6): 2609-2625.
[21] Zoback M L. First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The world stress map project[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1992, 97(B8): 11703-11728.
[22] 谢富仁, 崔效锋, 赵建涛, 等. 中国大陆及邻区现代构造应力场分区[J]. 地球物理学报, 2004, 47(4): 654-662.
XIE Fu-ren, CUI Xiao-feng, ZHAO Jian-tao, et al. Regional division of the recent tectonic stress field in China and adjacent areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2004, 47(4): 654-662 (in Chinese).
[23] Zoback M L, Zoback M. State of stress in the conterminous United States[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1980, 85(B11): 6113-6156.
[24] McKenzie D P. The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the directions of the principal stresses[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1969, 59(2): 591-601.
[25] Gephart J W, Donald F W. An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data: Application to the San Fernando earthquake sequence[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1984, 89(B11): 9305-9320.
[26] 万永革, 盛书中, 许雅儒, 等. 不同应力状态和摩擦系数对综合P波辐射花样影响的模拟研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(4): 994-1001.
WAN Yong-ge, SHENG Shu-zhong, XU Ya-ru, et al. Effect of stress ratio and friction coefficient on composite P wave radiation patterns[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(4): 994-1001 (in Chinese).
[27] 程万正, 阮祥, 张永久. 川滇次级地块震源机制解类型与一致性参数[J]. 地震学报, 2006, 28(6): 561-573.
CHENG Wan-zheng, RUAN Xiang, ZHANG Yong-jiu. Types of focal mechanism solutions and parameter consistency of the sub-blocks in Sichuan and Yunnan Provinces[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2006, 28(6): 561-573 (in Chinese).
[28] 李君, 王勤彩, 崔子健, 等. 川滇菱形块体东边界及邻区震源机制解与构造应力场空间分布特征[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(6): 1395-1412.
LI Jun, WANG Qin-cai, CUI Zi-jian, et al. Characteristics of focal mechanisms and stress field in the Eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan block and its adjacent area[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2019, 41(6): 1395-1412 (in Chinese).
[29] 蒋海昆, 宋金, 贾若, 等. 不同时期水库地震活动主要影响因素讨论以三峡库区微震活动为例[J]. 地震, 2014, 34(1): 13-23.
JIANG Hai-kun, SONG Jin, JIA Ruo, et al. On the major influencing factors of reservoir-related seismicity in different stages: The case of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Earthquake, 2014, 34(1): 13-23 (in Chinese).
[30] 袁婷. 深埋超长隧道水文地质条件及涌水机理研究以锦屏二级水电站隧道为例[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2012.
YUAN Ting. Hydrogeological conditions and water gushing mechanism of the buried deep and long tunnel: A case study on the tunnel of Jinping Ⅱ hydropower station[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2012 (in Chinese).
[31] 万永魁, 沈小七, 刘瑞丰, 等. 川滇地区活动块体边界断裂现今运动和应力分布[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1614-1637.
WAN Yong-kui, SHEN Xiao-qi, LIU Rui-feng, et al. Present slip and stress distribution of block boundary faults in the Sichuan-Yunnan region[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2021, 43(6): 1614-1637 (in Chinese).
[32] 许忠淮, 汪素云, 黄雨蕊, 等. 由多个小震推断的青甘和川滇地区地壳应力场的方向特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 1987, 30(5): 476-486.
XU Zhong-huai, WANG Su-yun, HUANG Yu-rui, et al. Directions of mean stress axes in southwestern China deduced from microearthquake data[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 1987, 30(5): 476-486 (in Chinese).
[33] 郭祥云, 陈学忠, 王生文, 等. 川滇地区中小地震震源机制解及构造应力场的研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2014, 36(3): 599-607.
GUO Xiang-yun, CHEN Xue-zhong, WANG Sheng-wen, et al. Focal mechanism of small and moderate earthquakes and tectonic stress field in Sichuan-Yunan areas[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2014, 36(3): 599-607 (in Chinese).
[34] 刁桂苓, 徐锡伟, 陈于高, 等. 汶川M_W7.9和集集M_W7.6地震前应力场转换现象及其可能的前兆意义[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(1): 128-136.
DIAO Gui-ling, XU Xi-wei, CHEN Yu-gao, et al. The precursory significance of tectonic stress field transformation before the Wenchuan M_W7.9 earthquake and the Chi-Chi M_W7.6 earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(1): 128-136 (in Chinese).
[35] 阎春恒, 周斌, 李莎, 等. 利用小震分布和区域应力场确定龙滩库区地震断层面参数[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(3): 562-580.
YAN Chun-heng, ZHOU Bin, LI Sha, et al. Determination of fault plane parameters in the Longtan reservoir by using precisely located small earthquake data and regional stress field[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2020, 42(3): 562-580 (in Chinese).
[36] 杜兴信, 邵辉成. 由震源机制解反演中国大陆现代构造应力场[J]. 地震学报, 1999, 21(4): 354-360.
DU Xing-xin, SHAO Hui-cheng. Modern tectonic stress field in the Chinese mainland inversed from focal mechanism solutions[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1999, 21(4): 354-360 (in Chinese).
[37] 王晓山, 吕坚, 谢祖军, 等. 南北地震带震源机制解与构造应力场特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(11): 4149-4162.
WANG Xiao-shan, LÜ Jian, XIE Zu-jun, et al. Focal mechanisms and tectonic stress field in the North-South Seismic Belt of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(11): 4149-4162 (in Chinese).
[38] 万永革. 联合采用定性和定量断层资料的应力张量反演方法及在乌鲁木齐地区的应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(9): 3144-3156.
WAN Yong-ge. A grid search method for determination of tectonic stress tensor using qualitative and quantitative data of active faults and its application to the Urumqi area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(9): 3144-3156 (in Chinese).
[39] 陈翰林, 赵翠萍, 修济刚, 等. 龙滩库区水库地震震源机制及应力场特征[J]. 地震地质, 2009, 31(4): 686-698.
CHEN Han-lin, ZHAO Cui-ping, XIU Ji-gang, et al. Study on the characteristics of focal mechanisms of reservoir induced earthquakes and stress field in the Longtan reservoir area[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2009, 31(4): 686-698 (in Chinese).
[40] 国家测震台网数据备份中心. 国家测震台网地震波形数据[DB/OL]. 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 2017, http://www.seisdmc.ac.cn.
Data Management Center of China National Seismic Network. Waveform data of China National Seismic Network[DB/OL]. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, 2017, http://www.seisdmc.ac.cn.
[41] 郑秀芬, 欧阳飚, 张东宁, 等. “国家数字测震台网数据备份中心”技术系统建设及其对汶川大地震研究的数据支撑[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009, 52(5): 1412-1417.
ZHENG Xiu-fen, OUYANG Biao, ZHANG Dong-ning, et al. Technical system construction of Data Backup Centre for China Seismograph Network and the data support to researches on the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009, 52(5): 1412-1417 (in Chinese).
[42] Wessel P, Smith F H W, Scharroo R, et al. Generic Mapping Tools: Improved version released[J]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 2013, 94(45): 409-410.

Seismic Activity, Focal Mechanism Solution and Stress Field in the Jinping Ⅰ Reservoir and Its Surrounding Area before and after Impoundment

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	GUAN Zhao-xuan, WAN Yong-ge, ZHOU Ming-yue, WANG Run-yan, SONG Ze-yao, HUANG Shao-hua, GU Pei-yuan. Seismogenic Fault Plane and Geodynamic Discussion of the 2024 Wushi M_S7.1 Earthquake, Xinjiang, China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 1-11.
[2]	YANG Yan-ming, SU Shu-juan, WANG Lei. Determination of Rupture Direction and Seismogenic Structure of the 2020 Heerlinger M_L4.5 Earthquake in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 63-85.
[3]	SHU Tian-tian, LUO Yan, ZHU Yin-jie. The Source Rupture Process and the Strong Ground Motion Estimation of the 2022 M_S6.8 Earthquake in Luding, Sichuan [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 19-36.
[4]	YANG Yan-ming, SU Shu-juan. The 2023 Jishishan M_S6.2 Earthquake in Gansu Province, China: A Shallow Strong Earthquake with Thrust-dominated Components [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 167-174.
[5]	WANG Run-yan, WAN Yong-ge, SONG Ze-yao, GUAN Zhao-xuan. Focal Mechanism and Stress Implication on the Surrounding Region of the Jishishan, Gansu M_S6.2 Earthquake on December 18, 2023 [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 175-184.
[6]	WANG Qin-cai, LUO Jun, CHEN Han-lin, MENG Lin-xin. Focal Mechanism for the December 18, 2023, Jishishan M_S6.2 Earthquake in Gansu Province [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 185-188.
[7]	TANG Jie, ZHANG Su-xin, FENG Xiang-dong, SUN Li-na, WANG Xiao-shan, BIAN Qing-kai. The Seismogenic Background of the 2020 Tangshan M5.1 Earthquake [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(4): 37-49.
[8]	XIN Jian-cun, FANG Wei, YANG Yi-hai, LI Na, YAN Wen-hua, FENG Hong-wu. Analysis on Variation of Geoelectric Field before M_S5.5 Earthquake in Aksai County, Jiuquan in 2021 [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(4): 153-168.
[9]	YANG Cheng, WAN Yong-ge. Study on Stress Field and Seismogenic Fault in Menyuan Area [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(3): 77-90.
[10]	LI Hui-ling, ZHANG Ming, LIN Xiu-na, CHEN Hong-kai, WEI jin, YAN Ming-hao. Analysis of Variation Characteristics of DF Microseisms Signals before the 2020 Changqing M4.1 Earthquake [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(3): 138-149.
[11]	CUI Ren-sheng, CHEN Yang, ZHAO Cui-ping, LUO Jun. Design and Implementation of the Interactive Inversion Software for Focal Mechanism Solution [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(3): 190-202.
[12]	HE Kang, XIE Tao, WANG Yi-kun, LI Jun-hui, ZHENG Hai-gang. Analysis of Earth Resistivity Anomaly at Hefei Seismic Station before the 2011 Anqing M4.8 Earthquake [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(2): 72-84.
[13]	JIANG Xi-jiao, LIN Qing-xi, GONG Xuan, YANG Xuan. Earthquake Focal Mechanism Solutions and Spatio-temporal Variations of Tectonic Stress Field in Xinfengjiang Reservoir since 2012 [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(3): 64-80.
[14]	SUN Zhao-jie, LI Jin. Analysis of the Focal Mechanism of Jiashi, Xinjiang, M_S5.5 Earthquake Sequences on September 4, 2018 [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(3): 81-98.
[15]	GUO Wen-feng, YAN Ji-ming, LIU Su-zhen, CAO Zhi-yong. Spatio-temporal Characteristics and Prediction Efficiency of Load-unload Response Ratio in Shanxi and Adjacent Areas [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(2): 100-110.