关于应力触发和应力影概念在地震预报中应用的一些思考

Abstract

Abstract: It is a frontier of contemporary research to apply the concepts of stress triggers and stress shadows to earthquake prediction, there are, however, a number of questions deserved in depth study. Among them are determination of initial stress field, choice of reasonable rheological models and their computation, variations of pore pressure and its effects, variation of fault strength with time. Particularly, in the present calculation of variations of stress field produced by fault dislocation, only the effects of large earthquakes have been included, but latest observations indicate that effects of large amount of small earthquakes, slow and quiet earthquakes, and aseismic slip are not negligible. Quantitative study of their effects is a promising direction in the research on stress triggers and stress shadows.

Key words: Stress triggers, Stress shadows, Earthquake prediction

CLC Number:

P315. 72

SHI Yao-lin. Stress triggers and stress shadows: How to apply these concepts to earthquake prediction[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2001, 21(3): 1-7.

References

[1] Harris R A. Introduction to special section: Stress triggers, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard [J]. Jour Geophys Res, 1998, 103(B10): 24347-24358.
[2] Smith S W, Van de Lindt W. Strain adjustment a ssociated with earthquakes in southern California [J]. Bull Seismolo Soc Am, 1969, 59: 11-1589.
[3] Rybicki K. Analysis of after shocks on the basis of dislocation theory [J]. Phys earth Planet Inter, 1973, 7: 402-422.
[4] Yamashina K. A possible factor which trigg ers sha llow intr a-pla te earthquakes [J]. Phys earth Planet Inter, 1979, 18: 153-164.
[5] Stein R S, Lisowski M. The 1979 Homestead Valley earthquake sequence, Califo rnia: Control of after shocks and postseismic defo rmation[J]. J Geophys Res, 1983, 88: 66-6490.
[6] 王仁.华北地区地震迁移规律的数学模拟[J].地震学报, 1980, 2(1): 32-42.
[7] Hill D P, Rea senberg P A, Micha el A, et al. Seismicity remotely trig g ered by the magnitude 7. 3 Landers, California earthquake [J]. Science, 1993, 260: 11-1623.
[8] Stein R S, Barka A A, Dieterich J H. Prog ressive failiure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earth quake stress triggering [J]. Geophys J Int, 1997, 128: 594-604.
[9] Okata Y. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space [J]. Bull Seismo l So c Am, 1992, 82: 11-1040.
[10] Deng Jishu, Gurnis M, Karamo ri H, et al. Visco elastic flow in the lower crust after the 1992 Landers, California earthquake [J]. Science 1998, 282: 1689-1692
[11] Pollitz F F, Burgmann R, Romanowicz B. Viscosity of oceanic asthenosphere inferred from remote triggering of earthquakes [J]. Science, 1998, 280: 1245-1249.
[12] Peltzer G, Rosen P, Roger F, et al. Postseismic rebound in fault step-overs caused by porefluid flow [J]. Science, 1996, 273: 11-1204.
[13] Dapeng Zhao, Hiroo Kanamori, Hiroaki Negishi, et al. Tomogr aphy of the source area of the 1995 Ko be Earthquake: Evidence for fluids at the hypocenter? [J]. Science, 1996, 274: 11-1894.
[14] Li Yong-Gang, Vidal J E, Aki K, et al. Evidence of shallow fault zo ne streng thening after the 1992 M7. 5 Landers, California, earthquake [J]. Science, 1998, 279: 217-219.
[15] Beroza G C, Jordan T H. Sea rching for slow and silent earthquakes using freeo scillations [J]. Jour Geophys Res, 1990, 95(B3): 2485-2510.
[16] Nadeau R M, McEvilly T V. Fault slip rates at depth from recurr ence interv als of repeating micro earthquakes [J]. Science, 1999, 285: 718-721.
[17] Crescentini L, Amoruso A, Scar pa R. Constraints on slow earthquake dynamics from a swarm in Central Italy [J]. Science, 1996, 286: 2132-2134.
[18] McGuire J J, Ihmle P F, Jor dan T H. Time-domain observations of slow precursor to the 1994 Romanche transform ea rthqua ke [J]. Science, 1996, 274: 82-85.
[19] Kerr R A. Geophysicists po nder ancient chills and elusiv equakes [J]. Science, 1997, 276: 1792-1793.
[20] Kerr R A. A slow start for earthquakes [J]. Science, 1998, 279: 985.
[21] Iacopi R. earthquake Country [M]. Lane Book Compa ny, Menlo Park, 1964. 191.
[22] Reilinger R E, Ergintav S, Burgmann R, et al. Coseismic and postseismic Fault Slip for the 17 Aug ust 1999, Izmit Turkey earthquake [J]. Science, 2000, 289: 1519-1524.
[23] Kerr R A. Can great earthquakes extendtheir reach? [J]. Science, 1998, 280: 11-1195.
[24] Hardebeck J L, Hauksson E. Role of fluids in faulting inferred from Stress field signatures [J]. Science, 1999, 285: 236-239.

Stress triggers and stress shadows: How to apply these concepts to earthquake prediction

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Xiao-li, ZHOU Dong-rui, LI Ling-li, ZHANG Bing, LIU Jian, LI Jun-hui. Small Earthquake Detection in Huoshan Seismic Window and Its Application in Earthquake Prediction [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 135-146.
[2]	BO Wan-ju, ZHANG Li-cheng, SU Guo-ying, XU Dong-zhuo, ZHAO Li-jun. Thoughts on Monitoring and Forecasting Methods of Strong Earthquake with Crust Deformation Data [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 64-77.
[3]	TIAN Wei-xi, ZHANG Yong-xian. Study on Earthquake Forecast in the North-South Seismic Belt by Pattern Informatics Method [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(3): 159-177.
[4]	WANG Yang-hong, SU He-jun, ZHANG Hui, LI Chen-hua, ZHOU Hui-ling. Application of Standard Annual Dynamic Curve Method in Radon Data Processing of Seismic Fluid Monitoring Station [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(1): 171-184.
[5]	ZHANG Xiang, SUN Xian-kun, HU Jun, YIN Jing-yuan, XIONG Yu-jie. Short-term and Imminent Earthquake Prediction Combined with Data Augmentation and Residual Shrinkage Network [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(2): 74-88.
[6]	YUAN Ai-jing, WANG Wei-jun, PENG Fei, YAN Kun, KOU Hua-dong. Recent Progress of Earthquake Prediction with Machine Learning [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2021, 41(1): 51-66.
[7]	WANG Xi-long, JIA Xiao-dong, QIAN Rui, FU Cong. Analysis on Anomalous Characteristics and Earthquake Prediction Efficiency of High-frequency Information from Digital Water Level and Water Temperature before 2013 Lushan M7.0 Earthquake in the North-South Seismic Belt of China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(2): 100-116.
[8]	XU Zhong-huai. In Search of a New Physical Basis for Large Earthquake Prediction [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2019, 39(2): 11-18.
[9]	SHI Fu-qiang, SHAO Zhi-gang, ZHU Lin, ZHANG Zhu-qi, SHAO Hui-cheng. Earthquake Science on the Western Coast of South American (Chile)and Implications for Earthquake Prediction: An Overview [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2019, 39(1): 155-170.
[10]	LI Yan-e, CHEN Xue-zhong. Coulomb Stress Changes Imparted in the Rupture Zones of the Lushan Earthquake and the Kangding Earthquake by the 2008 Wenchuan M_S8.0 Earthquake [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2019, 39(1): 136-145.
[11]	LI Li, WANG Xia, SONG Mei-qin, WU Hao-yu, LIANG Yan. Earthquake Prediction Effectiveness based on Anomaly Judgement of Datong Window [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(4): 142-150.
[12]	ZHANG Guo-qing, ZHU Yi-qing, LIANG Wei-feng, GUO Shu-song, WEI Shou-chun. Spatial Patterns of Regional Gravity Changes before the 2008 and 2014 Yutian M_S7.3 Earthquakes [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(4): 14-21.
[13]	XIANG Yang, SUN Xiao-long, WANG Bo. Earthquake Prediction Efficiency Testing of Observed Fluid Data in Xinjiang using Molchan Diagram Method [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(3): 103-114.
[14]	SHAO Zhi-gang, WANG Peng. Reflections on Earthquake Prediction Research Ten Years after the 2008 Wenchuan M_S8.0 Earthquake [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(2): 1-10.
[15]	YIN Xiang-chu,LIU Yue,ZHANG lang-ping, LI Wen-jun,YUAN Shuai,ZHANG Xiao-tao. LURR Anomaly, Prediction and Tracking of Large Earthquakes in the Pan-southwestern Region [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2017, 37(4): 37-49.