EARTHQUAKE ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 123-130.
Previous Articles Next Articles
OUYANG Xin-yan1,2, LOU Wen-yu1, SHEN Xu-hui1, Zhang Xue-min1
Received:
2013-11-18
Online:
2015-01-31
Published:
2020-06-22
CLC Number:
OUYANG Xin-yan, LOU Wen-yu, SHEN Xu-hui, Zhang Xue-min. Extraction and Analysis of Schumann Resonance Anomaly Features based on Earthquakes Larger than M6.0 in Mainland China[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2015, 35(1): 123-130.
[1] Hattori K. Recent Progress and State of the Art in Seismo-Electromagnetic Study[J]. IEEJ Transactions on Fundamentals and Materials, 2010. 130: 2-5. [2] Hayakawa M, Hattori K, Ando Y, et al. Natural Electromagnetic Phenomena and Electromagnetic Theory[M]. Denki Gakkai Gijutsu Hokoku, 2006(1065): 66P. [3] Ohta K, Izutsu J, Schekotov A, et al. The ULF/ELF electromagnetic radiation before the 11 March 2011 Japanese earthquake[J]. Radio Science, 2013. 48: 589-596. [4] Liu J. Earthquake precursors observed in the ionospheric F-region[A]. Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated with Earthquakes[C], 2009. 7: 187-204. [5] Hayakawa M, Kasahara Y, Nakamura T, et al. A statistical study on the correlation between lower ionospheric perturbations as seen by subionospheric VLF/LF propagation and earthquakes[J]. J Geophys Res, 2010. 115(A9): A09305. [6] Molchanov O, Kopytenko Y A, Voronov P, et al. Results of ULF magnetic field measurements near the epicenters of the Spitak (MS=6.9) and Loma Prieta (MS=7.1) earthquakes: Comparative analysis[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1992. 19(14): 1495-1498. [7] Hao Y Q, Xiao Z, Zhang D H, Responses of the Ionosphere to the Great Sumatra Earthquake and Volcanic Eruption of Pinatubo[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2006. 23(7): 1955. [8] Hao Y Q, Xiao Z, Zhang D H. Multi‐instrument observation on co-seismic ionospheric effects after great Tohoku earthquake[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics (1978—2012), 2012. 117(A2). [9] Hao Y Q, Xiao Z, Zhang D H. Teleseismic magnetic effects (TMDs) of 2011 Tohoku earthquake[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2013. [10] Schumann W. On the free oscillations of a conducting sphere which is surrounded by an air layer and an ionosphere shell[J]. Z Naturforsch a, 1952. 7: 149-154. [11] Balser M, Wagner C. Observations of Earth-ionosphere cavity resonances[J]. Nature, 1960. 188(4751): 638-641. [12] Hayakawa M, Ohta K, Nickolaenko A P, et al. Anomalous effect in Schumann resonance phenomena observed in Japan, possibly associated with the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan[J]. Annales geophysicae, 2005, 23(4): 1335-1346. [13] Ohta K, Watanabe N, Hayakawa M. Survey of anomalous Schumann resonance phenomena observed in Japan, in possible association with earthquakes in Taiwan[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2006. 31(4-9): 397-402. [14] Ohta K, Izutsu J, Hayakawa M, Anomalous excitation of Schumann resonances and additional anomalous resonances before the 2004 Mid-Niigata prefecture earthquake and the 2007 Noto Hantou Earthquake[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2009. 34(6-7): 441-448. [15] Hayakawa M, Nickolaenko A P, Sekiguchi M, et al. Anomalous ELF phenomena in the Schumann resonance band as observed at Moshiri (Japan) in possible association with an earthquake in Taiwan[J]. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 2008, 8(6): 1309-1316. [16] 欧阳新艳, 张学民, 申旭辉, 等. 云南地区观测的舒曼谐振背景变化特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(6): 1937-1944. [17] 苗园青, 张学民, 申旭辉, 等. 云南地区震前舒曼谐振异常初步分析[J]. 中国地震, 2011, 27(3): 290-299. [18] 周洪娟, 于海雁, 曹丙霞, 等. 日本MW9.0地震前的舒曼谐振异常分析[J]. 地震学报, 2013, 35(3): 400-409. [19] Ouyang X Y, Zhang X M, Nickolaenko A P, et al. Schumann Resonance observation in China and anomalous disturbance possibly associated with Tohoku M9.0 earthquake[J]. Earthquake Science, 2013, 26(2): 137-145. doi:10.1007/s11589-013-0009-0. [20] Nickolaenko A, Hayakawa M, Sekiguchi M, et al. Model modifications in Schumann resonance intensity caused by a localized ionosphere disturbance over the earthquake epicenter[J]. Annales geophysicae, 2006, 24(2): 567-575. |
[1] | GUAN Zhao-xuan, WAN Yong-ge, ZHOU Ming-yue, WANG Run-yan, SONG Ze-yao, HUANG Shao-hua, GU Pei-yuan. Seismogenic Fault Plane and Geodynamic Discussion of the 2024 Wushi MS7.1 Earthquake, Xinjiang, China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 1-11. |
[2] | LI Yue, LIU Zhen-hui, MA Han-yu, WANG Yi-xi, SHAO Yong-xin. Permeability Changes of Tianjin Typical Observation Wells and Coseismic Response Mechanism to Maduo MS7.4 Earthquake [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 33-51. |
[3] | JING Tao, Boonphor Phetphouthongdy, Chansouk Sioudom, LIU Yang-yang, LI Ji-geng, KANG Chun-li, MA Wei-yu. Analysis of Outgoing Longwave Radiation Changes before and after the Dengta MS5.1 Earthquake Based on Tidal Additional Tectonic Stress [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 52-62. |
[4] | YANG Yan-ming, SU Shu-juan, WANG Lei. Determination of Rupture Direction and Seismogenic Structure of the 2020 Heerlinger ML4.5 Earthquake in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 63-85. |
[5] | WANG Ting-ting, BIAN Yin-ju, REN Meng-yi, YANG Qian-li, HOU Xiao-lin. Seismic Event Recognition Software [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 104-119. |
[6] | SONG Cheng, ZHANG Yong-xian, XIA Cai-yun, BI Jin-meng, ZHANG Xiao-tao, WU Yong-jia, XU Xiao-yuan. Retrospective Study on the Forecasting of the Three MS≥5.0 Earthquakes Since 2019 in North China Based on PI Method [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 120-134. |
[7] | LIU Jun-qing, ZHANG Xiao-gang, ZHANG Yu, CAI Hong-lei, CHEN Zhuo, BAO Xiu-min. Study of Seismic Moment Tensor Inversion by Multi-point Sources for Jishishan MS6.2 Earthquake on December 18, 2023, in Gansu Province, China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 169-177. |
[8] | HUANG Feng, XIONG Ren-wei, LIN Jing-dong, ZHAO Zheng, YANG Pan-xin. Geomorphic Index and Activity Characteristics of the Mid-Segment of Jiali Fault [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 1-18. |
[9] | SHU Tian-tian, LUO Yan, ZHU Yin-jie. The Source Rupture Process and the Strong Ground Motion Estimation of the 2022 MS6.8 Earthquake in Luding, Sichuan [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 19-36. |
[10] | WU Xu, XUE Bing, LI Jiang, ZHU Xiao-yi, ZHANG Bing, HUANG Shi. Design and Implementation of Borehole Comprehensive Observation Timing System [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 37-49. |
[11] | BO Wan-ju, ZHANG Li-cheng, SU Guo-ying, XU Dong-zhuo, ZHAO Li-jun. Thoughts on Monitoring and Forecasting Methods of Strong Earthquake with Crust Deformation Data [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 64-77. |
[12] | YUE Xiao-yuan, LI Yan-e, ZHONG Shi-jun, WANG Wei, WANG Yan, MA Liang. Anormalies of b-value Changes before M≥4.0 Earthquake in Tangshan Old Seismic Region [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 94-108. |
[13] | JIA Xin-ye, BAI Shao-qi, JIA Yan-jie, LIU Fang, NA Re. Study on Lg Wave Attenuation and Site Response Characteristics in Central and Western of Inner Mongolia, China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 109-117. |
[14] | CHEN Guang-qi, WU Yan-qiang, XIA Ming-yao, LI Zhi-yuan. The Japan Noto Peninsula M7.6 Earthquake on January 1, 2024: Focal Characteristics, Disaster Situation and Emergency Response [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 141-152. |
[15] | YANG Pan-xin, XIONG Ren-wei, HU Chao-zhong, GAO Yuan. Preliminary Analysis of the Seismogenic Tectonics for the 2023 Jishishan MS6.2 Earthquake in Gansu Province [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 153-159. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||