利用多种地震学参数研究中国大陆地壳应变场

Abstract

Abstract: Study on crustal strain field is a basic field in geodynamic researches. The researches in the field are mainly centralized in the survey and studies of the crustal deformation, including the leveling survey and GPS survey in a large area, etc. In this paper, the crustal strain field of the continental China is studied by using several seismic parameters. The statistic relationship between magnitude of surface wave and scalar seismic moment in different regions of China is presented by using Harvard CMT catalogue and present-day earthquake catalogue of China. Then, the historical earthquake data are used to study the crustal strain field on the China's continent, and the distribution of the seismic maximal shear strain rate is presented. The result indicates that the Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding regions show a high-value of maximal shear strain rates, and the strain rates in the Pamirs and Asam regions are the largest. Compared with the GPS strain field, these two kings of results are coincident. The distribution of seismic apparent strain in China's continent is studied by using the seismic radiated energy catalogue that provide by the NEIC (National Earthquake Information Center). The distribution of apparent strain is related with the level of crustal deformation, and the apparent stains of earthquakes that located in the surrounding regions of Tibetan Plateau are higher. Those results provide new scientific data for the researches on geodynamic.

Key words: Strain, Apparent strain, Harvard CMT catalogue, Historical earthquake

CLC Number:

P315.7

WANG Hui, ZHANG Guo-min, JIANG Zai-sen, MA Hong-sheng, WANG Xin-ling. Study on strain field of continental China using multiple seismological parameters[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2005, 25(2): 9-18.

References

[1] 张国民, 张培震. “大陆强震机理与预测”中期学术进展[J]. 中国基础科学, 2000, (10): 4-10.
[2] 许忠淮, 汪素云, 黄雨蕊, 等. 由大量的地震资料推断的我国大陆构造应力场[J]. 地球物理学报, 1989, 32(6): 636-646.
[3] Holt W E, M Li, Haines A J. Earthquake strain rates and instantaneous relative motions within central and eastern Asia[J]. Geophy J Int, 1995, 122:569-593.
[4] 江在森, 马宗晋, 张希, 等. GPS初步结果揭示的中国大陆水平应变参与构造变形[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(1): 352-358.
[5] 吴忠良, 黄静, 张东宁. 地震矩张量元素M_rr空间分布与中国大陆岩石层地块[J]. 地震地质, 2003, 25(1): 33-38.
[6] 马瑾.从断层中心论向块体中心论[J]. 地学前缘, 1999, 6(4): 363-369.
[7] 张国民, 马宏生, 王辉. 中国大陆活动地块与强震活动关系[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2004, 34(7): 591-599.
[8] 王辉, 张国民, 汪素云, 等. 应用地震学方法研究中国大陆活动地块应力应变场[J]. 地球物理学报, 2004, 47(6): 1035-1043.
[9] Kostov V V. Seismic moment, energy of earthquakes, and the seismic flow of rock[A]. IZV. Acad. Sci. USSR Phys. Solid Earth, Engl. Transl., 10:23-44.
[10] 黄玮琼, 李文香, 曹学锋.中国大陆地震完整性研究(之二)[J]. 地震学报, 1994, 16(4): 423-432.
[11] 国家地震局震害防御司. 中国历史强震目录[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995.
[12] 中国地震局震害防御司. 中国近代地震目录(公元1912~1990年)[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1999.
[13] Zhang G M, Wang S Y, Li li, et al. Focal depth research of earthquake in Mainland China: implication for tectonics[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, 47(12): 969-974.
[14] 郭增建, 秦保燕.震源物理[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1979.
[15] Helffrich G R. How good are routinely determined focal mechanisms? Empirical statistics based on a comparison of Harvard, USGS and ERI moment tensors[J]. Geophys J Int, 1997, 131: 741-750.
[16] 吴忠良, 黄静, 林碧苍. 中国西部地震视应力的空间分布[J]. 地震学报, 2002, 24(3): 293-301.
[17] Wyss M, Brune J N. Seismic moment, stress and source dimensions for earthquakes in the California-Nevada region[J]. J Geophy Res, 1968, 76: 4681-4694.
[18] Boatwright J, Choy G L. Teleseismic estimates of the energy radiated by shallow earthquakes[J]. J Geophys Res, 1986, 91: 2095-2112.
[19] Choy G L, Boatwright J L. Global patterns of radiated seismic energy and apparent stress[J]. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100(B9): 18205-18228.
[20] 吴忠良.由宽频带辐射能量目录和地震矩目录给出的视应力及其地震学意义[J]. 中国地震, 2001, 17(1): 8-15.
[21] 江在森, 张希, 陈文胜, 等. 地形变资料求解应变值的尺度相对性问题研究[J]. 地震学报, 2000, 22(4): 352-359.
[22] 杨国华, 李延兴, 韩月萍, 等. 由GPS观测结果推导中国大陆现今水平应变场[J]. 地震学报, 2002, 24(4): 337-346.
[23] 李延兴, 杨国华, 李智, 等.中国大陆活动地块的运动与应变状态[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2003, 33(增刊): 65-81.
[24] 徐锡伟, 陈文彬, 于贵华, 等. 2001年11月14日昆仑山库塞湖地震(M_S8.1)地表破裂带的基本特征[J]. 地震地质, 2002, 24(1): 1-13.

Study on strain field of continental China using multiple seismological parameters

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Run-yan, WAN Yong-ge, SONG Ze-yao, GUAN Zhao-xuan. Focal Mechanism and Stress Implication on the Surrounding Region of the Jishishan, Gansu M_S6.2 Earthquake on December 18, 2023 [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 175-184.
[2]	WANG Xiao-lei, XUE Bing, CUI Ren-sheng, ZHU Xiao-yi, GAO Shang-hua, ZHAO Shuai-bo, ZHANG Bing. Rayleigh Wave Dispersion Characteristics Based on the Observations from Seismometer and Collocated Four-Gauge Borehole Strainmeter [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(4): 21-36.
[3]	YANG Ye-xin, MENG Guo-jie, WU Wei-wei, LUO Yan, Thant Myo. Characteristics of Deep and Shallow Tectonics Deformation in Southwest Yunnan [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(1): 74-92.
[4]	LI Fu-zhen, REN Tian-xiang, ZHANG Huai, SHI Yao-lin. Visual Analysis Platform of Borehole Strain Data Based on B/S [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(1): 185-197.
[5]	YANG Ye-xin, MENG Guo-jie, WU Wei-wei, ZHAO Guo-qiang. Characteristics of Crustal Strain and Stress in the Northeastern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(4): 1-13.
[6]	ZHANG Nan, NIE Gao-zhong, FAN Xi-wei, WANG Jing, YU Si-han, SUN Jia-xin, XIE Hui. The Estimation of Current Motion Rates and Slip Deficits of the Main Active Faults in the Northern Segment of the North-South Seismic Belt Based on GNSS Velocity Field [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(4): 25-46.
[7]	JIN Yang, JIN Hong-lin, GAO Yuan, HUANG Xing. Application of Three Strain Calculation Methods Based on GNSS Data in the Southeastern Margin of Tibet Plateau [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2021, 41(4): 57-67.
[8]	YANG Xiao-lin, YANG Jin-ling. Characteristics and Mechanism of Borehole Strainmeter in Response to a Squall Line in East China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2021, 41(4): 180-191.
[9]	CHANG Jin-long, GAN Wei-jun, MENG Ling-sheng, ZHU Cheng-lin, LIU Jun-qing. Preliminary Analysis of GPS Strain Field Cloud Method for Idenetifying Seismic Deformation Field Anomalies [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2021, 41(3): 22-31.
[10]	CHEN Xue-zhong, LI Yan-e, CHEN Li-juan. The Accelerating Seismic Strain Release Observed by the Qiaojia Seismic Array Prior to the Ludian M_S6.5 Mainshock [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2021, 41(3): 32-41.
[11]	YANG Xiao-lin, WEI Zi-gen, YANG Jin-ling. A Diagnostic Study of Annual Strain Variations in Vault-housed Extensometers at the Geodynamic Observatory Qianling, Shaanxi Province [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(2): 177-187.
[12]	XUE Yan, JIANG Xiang-hua, LIU Gui-ping. Active State and Trend on Strong Earthquakes in North China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(2): 1-17.
[13]	HU Ya-xuan, ZENG Zhi, LI Chang-jun, LI Yu-hang, SONG Shang-wu. Research on Present-day Crustal Deformation and Fault Activities in Xichang Area [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(1): 62-72.
[14]	ZHANG Xiao, QI Yu-yan, YUN Meng, LI Hui, SHE Ya-wen. Analysis on Changes of the Tectonic Strain in Survey Area Based on Multi-Component Borehole Straingauge [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2019, 39(4): 76-83.
[15]	YU Ji-peng, MENG Guo-jie, SU Xiao-ning, Nikolay Shestakov, Mikhail Gerasimenko, Hiroaki Takahashi, Mako Ohzono, LIU Tai, LI Cheng-tao. The Current Crustal Deformation of Northeast China Deduced from GPS Observations [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2019, 39(3): 11-27.