地壳流体与地震活动关系及其对地震预测探索的启示

Abstract

CLC Number:

CHE Yong-tai, YU Jin-zi, WANG Ji-hua, ZHAO Jun-meng, LIN Yuan-wu. The relation between f lluid in crust and seismic activity and its enlightenment to earthquake prediction[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2000, 20(z1): 91-96.

References

[1] КозловскийЕ А. 科拉超深井 [M]. 张秋生译 . 北京: 地质出版社, 1988. 189-199.
[2] 李有源. 欧州共同体国家地壳流体研究的某些进展与发展趋势 [J]. 地学前缘, 1996, 3(4): 313-323.
[3] 车用太, 刘五洲, 鱼金子, 等 . 板内强震的中地壳硬夹层孕震与流体促震假设 [J]. 地震学报, 1999, 22(1): 93-101.
[4] 钟以章,肖秀清 . 辽东半岛温泉与地震空间分布关系讨论 [J]. 地震地质, 1990, 12(4): 343-350.
[5] 林元武. 温泉热储温度对断裂的弱化作用及其对地震活动性的影响 [J]. 地震学报, 1994, 16(2): 251-257.
[6] 张虎男. 火山活动、地震活动、水热活动关系 [A]. 刘若新. 火山作用与人类环境 [C]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995. 101-107.
[7] 王安滨 .天津地区热-震能态关系初步分析 [A].刘连柱 . 减灾论坛 [C]. 香港: 欧亚经济出版社, 1999.60-64.
[8] 车用太, 刘五洲,鱼金子 . 地壳流体与地震活动关系及其在强震预测中的意义 [J]. 地震地质, 1998, 20(4): 431-436.
[9] 刘国栋, 史书林,王宝钧 . 华北壳内高导层及其与地壳构造活动性的关系 [J]. 中国科学(B辑). 1984, (9): 839-848.
[10] 徐昌芳 .中国大陆地壳上地幔电性结构及地震分布规律 [J]. 地震学报, 1996, 18(2): 254-251.
[11] 郭增建, 秦保燕. 震源物理[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1979. 51-63, 167-168.
[12] Zhao Da -feng, Hiro o K, Hir aki N . To mog raphy of the Source Area of the 1995 Ko be ea rthquake: Ev idence for Fluids at the hypocenter? [J]. Science, 1996, 274: 1891-1894.
[13] Gupta H K, Sarma S V S. Seismo logic and magne to telluric studies revealed alowv elocity, high conductiveano malynear the hypocenter of the 1993 Latur earthquak in India [J]. Geophys Res Lett, 1996, 23(13): 1569.
[14] 汤吉,赵国泽,王继军, 等. 张北-尚义地震前后电阻率的变化及分析 [J]. 地震地质, 1998, 20(2): 164-171.
[15] Cox S F.Faulting processes at high fluid pressure: an exam ple of faultv alve behavior from the water gully fault, Victoria, Australia [J]. J G R B, 1995, 100(7): 12841-12859.
[16] Evans D M . The Denver area Earthquakes and the Rocky Mountain Arsenal disposal well [J].Mountain Geol, 1966(3): 23-26.
[17] 赵根模, 张德之. 注水诱发地震研究 [M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995. 4-41.
[18] 车用太, 刘五洲,鱼金子 . 地壳流体与地震活动关系及其在强震预测中的意义 [J]. 地震地质, 1998, 20(4): 431-435.

The relation between f lluid in crust and seismic activity and its enlightenment to earthquake prediction

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Xiao-li, ZHOU Dong-rui, LI Ling-li, ZHANG Bing, LIU Jian, LI Jun-hui. Small Earthquake Detection in Huoshan Seismic Window and Its Application in Earthquake Prediction [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(2): 135-146.
[2]	BO Wan-ju, ZHANG Li-cheng, SU Guo-ying, XU Dong-zhuo, ZHAO Li-jun. Thoughts on Monitoring and Forecasting Methods of Strong Earthquake with Crust Deformation Data [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2024, 44(1): 64-77.
[3]	TIAN Wei-xi, ZHANG Yong-xian. Study on Earthquake Forecast in the North-South Seismic Belt by Pattern Informatics Method [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(3): 159-177.
[4]	WANG Yang-hong, SU He-jun, ZHANG Hui, LI Chen-hua, ZHOU Hui-ling. Application of Standard Annual Dynamic Curve Method in Radon Data Processing of Seismic Fluid Monitoring Station [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2023, 43(1): 171-184.
[5]	ZHANG Xiang, SUN Xian-kun, HU Jun, YIN Jing-yuan, XIONG Yu-jie. Short-term and Imminent Earthquake Prediction Combined with Data Augmentation and Residual Shrinkage Network [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(2): 74-88.
[6]	YUAN Ai-jing, WANG Wei-jun, PENG Fei, YAN Kun, KOU Hua-dong. Recent Progress of Earthquake Prediction with Machine Learning [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2021, 41(1): 51-66.
[7]	MA He-qing, YANG Ming-zhi, LUO Guo-fu. Study on Frequency Field of Seismic Activity [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(3): 99-111.
[8]	WANG Xi-long, JIA Xiao-dong, QIAN Rui, FU Cong. Analysis on Anomalous Characteristics and Earthquake Prediction Efficiency of High-frequency Information from Digital Water Level and Water Temperature before 2013 Lushan M7.0 Earthquake in the North-South Seismic Belt of China [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(2): 100-116.
[9]	PANG Ya-jin, CHENG Hui-hong, DONG Pei-yu, SHI Yao-lin. Analysis of Regional Stress Disturbance Caused by Strong Earthquakes in Northern Tianshan: Taking 2012 Yili M6.6 Earthquake and 2017 Jinghe M6.6 Earthquakes as an Example [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2019, 39(3): 127-137.
[10]	XU Zhong-huai. In Search of a New Physical Basis for Large Earthquake Prediction [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2019, 39(2): 11-18.
[11]	SHI Fu-qiang, SHAO Zhi-gang, ZHU Lin, ZHANG Zhu-qi, SHAO Hui-cheng. Earthquake Science on the Western Coast of South American (Chile)and Implications for Earthquake Prediction: An Overview [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2019, 39(1): 155-170.
[12]	LI Yan-e, CHEN Xue-zhong. Coulomb Stress Changes Imparted in the Rupture Zones of the Lushan Earthquake and the Kangding Earthquake by the 2008 Wenchuan M_S8.0 Earthquake [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2019, 39(1): 136-145.
[13]	LI Li, WANG Xia, SONG Mei-qin, WU Hao-yu, LIANG Yan. Earthquake Prediction Effectiveness based on Anomaly Judgement of Datong Window [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(4): 142-150.
[14]	LI Chun-Hong, ZHAO Cui-Ping, ZHANG Na, ZHOU Lian-Qing. Seismic Background Characteristics in the Baihetan Reservoir Area [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(4): 94-108.
[15]	ZHANG Jin-ling, ZHU Xin-yun, MA Qi-yang, JIN Chun-hua. Characteristics of Q Value in Ningxia Region based on Sato Model [J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(4): 74-83.