多方法联合评估河套地震带的台网监测能力

地震 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 64-75.

多方法联合评估河套地震带的台网监测能力

韩晓明, 刘芳, 张帆, 赵星

内蒙古自治区地震局, 呼和浩特 010010

收稿日期:2015-03-19 出版日期:2015-10-31 发布日期:2020-06-28
作者简介:韩晓明(1980-), 男, 河南漯河人, 高级工程师, 主要从事数字地震学方法应用与研究。
基金资助:
中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH15010Y)和内蒙古自治区应用研发项目(20120427)联合资助

Multi-method Assessment of Network Monitoring Capabilities for the Hetao Seismic Belt

HAN Xiao-ming, ZHANG Fan, ZHAO Xing

Earthquake Administration of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010010, China

Received:2015-03-19 Online:2015-10-31 Published:2020-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用删除余震后的地震目录, 综合运用多种方法进行M_c值的定量计算和对比分析, 对河套地震带的台网监测能力的时空变化进行分析判定。结果表明, 1970年以来, 河套地震带的台网监测能力整体呈现逐步增强趋势。在Bootstrap次数为200的条件下, MAXC方法确定的研究区整体M_c值为M_L2.7±0.07, δM_c的分布基本控制在M_L0.1～0.4之间, EMR方法给出的M_c时序变化范围是M_L1.6～2.8; 多方法联合测定的M_c值变化范围为M_L1.8～3.3, R/S检验给出的结果是M_L3.4。对比发现, 余震删除对最小完整性震级的计算有一定影响, R/S检验求取的最小完整性震级在余震删除前后相差M_L0.9; 整体来看, M_c值随时间演化逐渐减小, 较小时空范围内的M_c值仍有显著的非均匀性变化现象, 不同时段内台网布局的空间调整以及地震事件的时空非均匀性活动可能是主要原因。

关键词: M_c值计算, 多方法联合评估, 余震删除, R/S检验, 河套地震带

Abstract: Using earthquake catalogue after deleting aftershocks, we combined several kinds of methods to quantitatively calculate and analyze the least magnitude of completeness (M_c) in the Hetao seismic belt. We analyze and judge temporal changes of network monitoring capabilities for this belt. The results show that, since 1970, Hetao seismic belt's network monitoring capabilities has been gradually increasing. Under the condition of Bootstrap 200 times, the M_c value is M_L2.7±0.07 and the distribution of δM_c is basicly controlled in M_L0.1～0.4 by the MAXC methods, however the M_c value is M_L1.6～2.8 by the EMR methods. The range of M_c by the multi-method determined is M_L1.8～3.3, the result of R/S test is M_L3.4. By comparison, we found that aftershock deletion has notable influence in the calculation of M_c, in particular, M_c had M_L0.9 deference before and after deleting the aftershocks by R/S test. On the whole, M_c is decreasing with time, but there are significant non-uniformity changes in small spatial and temporal scales. Maybe, the spatial adjustment of network and the non-uniformity activity of earthquakes are the main factors.

Key words: Calculation of M_c, Multi-method assessment, Aftershock deletion, R/S test, Hetao seismic belt

中图分类号:

P315.7

韩晓明, 刘芳, 张帆, 赵星. 多方法联合评估河套地震带的台网监测能力[J]. 地震, 2015, 35(4): 64-75.

HAN Xiao-ming, ZHANG Fan, ZHAO Xing. Multi-method Assessment of Network Monitoring Capabilities for the Hetao Seismic Belt[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2015, 35(4): 64-75.

参考文献

[1] 焦远碧, 吴开统, 杨满栋. 我国地震台网监测能力及台网观测条件质量评定[J]. 中国地震, 1990, 6(4): 1-7.
[2] 吴开统, 焦远碧. 论中国地震台网的监测效能[J]. 地震研究, 1981, 4(1): 19-26.
[3] Rydelek Paul A, Sacks I Selwyn. Testing the completeness of earthquake catalogs and the hypothesis of self-similarity[J]. Nature 1989, 337: 251-253.
[4] Wiemer Stefan, Wyss Max. Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan [J ]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 2000, 90(4): 859-869.
[5] 刘杰, 陈棋福, 陈顒. 华北地区地震目录完全性分析[J]. 地震, 1996, 16(1): 59-67.
[6] Woessner Jochen, Wiemer Stefan. Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogs: Estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainties[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 2005, 95(4): 684-698.
[7] 蒋长胜, 吴忠良, 李宇彤. 首都圈地区重复地震及其在区域地震台网定位精度评价中的应用[J]地球物理学报, 2008, 51(3): 817-827.
[8] 李志海, 蒋长胜, 黄瑜, 等. 新疆地区地震目录最小完整性震级和台网科学布局研究[J]. 地震学报, 2011, 33(6): 763-775.
[9] 韩立波, 蒋长胜, 李艳娥, 等. 用于地震可预测性研究CSEP计划的南北地震带地区地震最小完整性震级Mc研究[J]. 地震, 2012, 32(1): 17-27.
[10] 冯建刚, 蒋长胜, 韩立波, 等. 甘肃测震台网监测能力及地震目录完整性分析[J]. 地震学报, 2012, 34(5): 646-658.
[11] 刘芳, 蒋长胜, 张帆, 等. 基于EMR方法的内蒙古台网监测能力[J]. 地球科学, 2013, 38(6): 1356-1362.
[12] Ogata Yosihiko, Imoto Masajiro, Katsura Koichi. 3-D spatial variation of b-values of magnitude_frequency distribution beneath the Kanto district, Japan[J]. Geophys J Int, 1991, 104: 135-146.
[13] 李宇彤, 蒋长胜. 东北地区地震活动的Rydelek-Sacks周期性检验和震级-周期谱研究[J]. 地震学报, 2012, 34(1): 20-30.
[14] 曹刚. 内蒙古地震研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2011.
[15] 陈凌, 刘杰, 陈颙, 等. 地震活动性分析中余震的删除[J]. 地球物理学报, 1998, 41(增刊): 244-252.
[16] Sereno Thomas J JR, Bratt Steven R. Seismic detection capability at NORESS and implications for the detection threshold of a hypothetical network in the Soviet Union[J]. J Geophys Res, 1989, 94: 10397-10414.
[17] Gomberg Joan. Seismicity and detection location threshold in the southern Great Basin seismic network[J]. J Geophys Res, 1991, 96: 16401-16414.
[18] Schorlemmer D, Woessner J. Probability of detecting and earthquake[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 2008, 98: 2013-2117.
[19] Mignan A, Werner M J, Wiemer S, et al. Bayesian estimation of the spatially varying completeness magnitude of earthquake catalogs[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 2011, 101: 1371-1385.
[20] Cao Aimin, Gao Stephen S. Tempora1 variation of seismic b-values beneath northeastern Japan island arc[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2002, 29(9): 13-34.
[21] Chernick Michael R. Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers[M]. USA: Wiley-Inter science Publication, 1999.
[22] Keiiti Aki. Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula logn=a-bm and its confidence limits[J]. Bull Earthquake Re Inst, Tokyo Unive, 1965, 43: 237-239.
[23] 石耀霖, 陈棋福, 马丽. 台网监测能力变化及其对地震活动性研究的影响[J]. 中国地震, 1990, 6(3): 1-10.