河北地区活断层潜在地震最大震级及危险性研究

地震 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 147-156.

河北地区活断层潜在地震最大震级及危险性研究

孙丽娜,齐玉妍,金学申

河北省地震局, 河北石家庄 050021

收稿日期:2016-06-21 出版日期:2017-04-20 发布日期:2019-08-14
作者简介:孙丽娜 (1982-), 女, 河北省石家庄市人, 硕士, 高级工程师, 主要从事地震中长期预测研究。
基金资助:
河北省地震科技星火计划项目资助

Seismic Risk and Maximum Magnitudes of Potential Earthquakes for Active Faults in Hebei Province

SUN Li-na,QI Yu-yan,JIN Xue-shen

Earthquake Administration of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050021, China

Received:2016-06-21 Online:2017-04-20 Published:2019-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 河北是华北地区乃至中国大陆东部地区地震活动最为活跃的地区之一, 构造背景复杂, 断层发育。随着全省11个城市活断层探测与地震危险性评价项目的推进, 若干科研课题的研究, 地质构造资料逐步积累, 晚更新世以来的断层资料得到进一步更新。如何评估这些活动断层上的最大潜在地震震级及危险性是地震中长期预测中较为重要的一个问题。本文采用闻学泽等提出的潜在地震最大震级评估模型, 对河北地区晚更新世以来的活动断层进行断层小区划分, 建立了断层小区内最大地震震级M_max与震级频度关系a_t/b值之间的经验关系, 并利用公式外推获得断层小区内的推测潜在震级上限值。另外, 本文用强震等待时间的指数分布关系式计算了部分断层小区未来的中强地震发震概率。

关键词: 活断层, 潜在最大地震, 发震概率, 断层小区划分, 河北地区

Abstract: Hebei province is one of the most active areas of seismic activity in north and even east mainland China, there is complex tectonic background and fault development. Along with the development of the province’s 11 urban active fault detection and seismic risk evaluation project, some scientific projects and the accumulation of the fault structural study data, late Pleistocene fault data is further updated. Then, there is an important question of how to assess the maximum potential earthquake magnitude and the risk of these active faults on long-term earthquake prediction. Using the maximum potential earthquake magnitude assessment model proposed by Wen Xue-ze, we first divided fault cell to the active faults in Hebei region, then formed the empirical relationship between the maximum magnitudes M_max and the a_t/b values of the sub-areas' frequency-magnitude relationship in the Hebei area, and got the upper limit of the potential magnitude in fault cells by the formula. Furthermore, we calculated the seismogenic probability of partial fault area in the future strong earthquakes through the exponential relation with earthquake waiting time.

Key words: Active faults, Fault sub-area, G-R relationship, Maximum potential earthquake, Earthquake probability

中图分类号:

P315.7

孙丽娜,齐玉妍,金学申. 河北地区活断层潜在地震最大震级及危险性研究[J]. 地震, 2017, 37(2): 147-156.

SUN Li-na,QI Yu-yan,JIN Xue-shen. Seismic Risk and Maximum Magnitudes of Potential Earthquakes for Active Faults in Hebei Province[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2017, 37(2): 147-156.

参考文献

[1] 张国民. 我国地震监测预报研究的主要科学进展[J]. 地震, 2002, 22(1): 2-8.
[2] 吴忠良, 蒋长胜. 统计预测、经验预测、物理预测近期国际地震预测预报研究的启示[J]. 2007, 23(3): 211-224.
[3] Jordan T h. Earthquake predictability, brick by brick[J]. Seism Res Lett, 2006, 77(1): 3-6.
[4] Field E D (eds.). Special Issue-Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models[J]. Seism Res Lett, 2007, 78(1): 1-140 .
[5] Zechar J D, Gerstenberger M C, Rhoades D A. Likelihood-based tests for evaluating space-rate-magnitude earthquake forecasts[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 2010, 100(3): 1184-1195.
[6] 刘艳辉, 赵根模, 吴中海, 等. 地震空区法在大地震危险性初判中的应用[J]. 地质力学学报, 2014, 20(3): 254-273.
[7] 龙锋, 闻学泽, 徐锡伟. 华北地区地震活断层的震级—破裂长度、破裂面积的经验关系[J]. 地震地质, 28(4): 511-535.
[8] Wells D L, Coppersmith K J. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1994, 84(4): 974-1002.
[9] 闻学泽, 徐锡伟, 龙锋, 等. 中国大陆东部中—弱活动断层潜在地震最大震级评估的震级-频度关系模型[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(2): 236-253.
[10] 梁明剑, 袁道阳, 刘百篪, 等. 兰州邻区活断层潜在地震最大震级及危险性评估[J]. 中国地震, 2008, 24(4): 317-324.
[11] 邵延秀, 袁道阳, 何文贵, 等. 陇南市活断层地震危险性评估[J]. 地震工程学报, 2014, 36(3): 645-655.
[12] 刘红艳, 陈宇坤, 闫成国, 等. 天津近海海域隐伏断裂地震危险性[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2013, 8(2): 146-155.
[13] Sornette D, knopoff L. The paradox of the expected time until the next earthquake[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1997, 87(4): 789-798.
[14] Gutenberg B, Richter C F. Magnitude and energy of earthquakes[J]. Ann Geofis, 1956, 9: 1-15.
[15] 陈时军, 王丽凤, 马丽, 等. 关于震级频度关系的一些讨论[J]. 地震学报, 2002, 24(2): 177-184.
[16] Scholz C H. The frequency-magnitude relation to micro fracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1968, 58: 399-415.
[17] Mogi K. Magnitude-frequency relation forelastic shocks accompanying fractures of various materials and some related problems in earthquakes[J]. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo., 1962, 40: 831-853.
[18] Papazachos B C. Atime and magnitude predictable model forgeneration of shallow earthquakes in the Aegean area[J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 1992, 138(2): 287-308.
[19] Wyss M, Wiemer S. Change in the probability for earthquakes in southern California due to the Landers magnitude 7.3 earthquake[J]. Science, 2000, 290: 1334-1338.
[20] 孙丽娜, 齐玉妍, 吕国军, 等. 华北地区中强震前中小地震活动的动态演化特征研究[J]. 地震, 2016, 36(1): 49-58.
[21] 黄玮琼, 李文香, 曹学锋. 中国大陆地震资料完整性研究之一分区地震资料基本完整的起始年分布图[J]. 地震学报, 1994, 16(4): 273-280.
[22] 国家地震局震害防御司. 地震工作手册[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1990.
[23] 卢寿德. GB17741—2005《工程场地地震安全性评价》宣贯教材[M]. 中国标准出版社, 2006: 76-80.
[24] 杨理华, 赵喜柱, 靳雅敏, 等. 河北省地震构造[J]. 华北地震科学, 1985, 3(1): 20-27.
[25] 李起彤, 南金生, 苏顺昌, 等. 华东地区中强地震构造背景和地质标志研究[J]. 华南地震, 1990, 10(1): 1-14.
[26] 唐方头, 张培震, 邓志辉, 等. 华北地区主要断裂带的现今运动特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2005, 33(1): 4-6.
[27] 孙丽娜, 齐玉妍, 金学申. 华北地区强震的等待时间研究[J]. 中国地震, 2015, 31(2): 424-431.