中国大陆活动地块边界带强震趋势研究

地震 ›› 2010, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 53-63.

中国大陆活动地块边界带强震趋势研究

张浪平¹, 李志雄¹, 邵志刚¹, 尹祥础^1,2

1.中国地震局地震预测研究所, 北京 100036;
2.中国科学院力学研究所非线性力学国家重点实验室, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2009-11-30 修回日期:2010-02-23 发布日期:2021-10-18
作者简介:张浪平(1982-), 男, 湖南涟源人, 助理研究员, 2009年获博士学位, 主要从事地震力学和地震预测等研究。
基金资助:
中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务专项(02092425)

Study of Strong Earthquake Trends on the Active Tectonic Boundaries in Chinese Mainland

ZHANG Lang-ping¹, LI Zhi-xiong¹, SHAO Zhi-gang¹, YIN Xiang-chu^1,2

1. Institute of Earthquake Science, CEA, Beijing 100036, China;
2. LNM, Institute of Mechanics of CAS, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2009-11-30 Revised:2010-02-23 Published:2021-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 已有研究表明, 中国大陆活动地块边界带是我国大陆强震的主体带和集中区, 因此有必要对各边界带开展强震危险性的跟踪分析。本文分别从加卸载响应比时序演化特征、基于对数正态分布的概率方法和b值变化特征3个方面对各边界带未来强震趋势进行了分析; 并分别根据加卸载响应比时序演化特征、综合累积概率与条件概率、 b值下降判断了各边界带未来发生强震的危险程度。最后, 根据3种方法的分析结果, 探讨了中国大陆未来5年发生强震的可能区域。

关键词: 活动地块边界带, 加卸载响应比, 对数正态分布, b值, 强震趋势, 中国大陆

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that the active tectonic boundaries in Chinese mainland are the main bands and concentration areas of strong earthquakes occurred in Chinese mainland. It is essential to carry out follow-up analysis of strong earthquake risk on the active tectonic boundaries. In this paper, we carry out the analysis on the trends of strong earthquakes along each active tectonic boundary from three aspects respectively, including the characteristics of the Load/Unload Response Ratio time series evolution, probability method based on the log-normal distribution function, and b value variations. Strong earthquake criticality on each active tectonic boundary is also estimated in terms of the characteristics of the Load/Unload Response Ratio time series evolution, investigating both cumulative probabilities and conditional probabilities and the decrease of the b value. Finally, according to the results of the three aspects referred earlier, possible areas where strong earthquakes might occur in next five years in Chinese Mainland are discussed.

Key words: Active tectonic boundary, Load/Unload Response Ratio (LURR), Log-normal distribution function, b value, Strong earthquake tendency, Chinese mainland

中图分类号:

P315.7

张浪平, 李志雄, 邵志刚, 尹祥础. 中国大陆活动地块边界带强震趋势研究[J]. 地震, 2010, 30(3): 53-63.

ZHANG Lang-ping, LI Zhi-xiong, SHAO Zhi-gang, YIN Xiang-chu. Study of Strong Earthquake Trends on the Active Tectonic Boundaries in Chinese Mainland[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2010, 30(3): 53-63.

参考文献

[1] 张国民, 张培震. “大陆强震机理与预测”中期学术进展[J]. 中国基础科学, 2000, (10): 4-10.
[2] 张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 等. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块[J]. 中国科学, 2003, 33(增刊): 12-20.
[3] 张国民, 马宏生, 王辉, 等. 中国大陆活动地块边界带与强震活动[J]. 地球物理学报, 2005, 48(3): 602-610.
[4] 马宏生, 张国民, 刘杰, 等. 中国大陆活动地块边界带强震活动特征研究[J]. 地震地质, 2006, 28(1): 48-60.
[5] 邵志刚, 张国民, 李志雄, 等. 中国大陆活动地块边界带地震活动过程及其趋势研究[J]. 地震, 2008, 28(3): 33-42.
[6] 国家地震局震害防御司. 中国历史强震目录[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995.
[7] 中国地震局震害防御司. 中国近代地震目录[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1999.
[8] 尹祥础. 地震预测新途径的探索[J]. 中国地震, 1987, 3: 1-7.
[9] 尹祥础, 尹灿. 非线性系统的失稳前兆与地震预测[J]. 中国科学, 1991, (5): 512-518.
[10] Yin X C, Chen X Z, Song Z P. The Load/Unload Response Ratio (LURR) theory and its application to earthquake prediction[J]. Journal of Earthquake Prediction Research, 1994, 3(3): 325-333.
[11] Yin X C, Chen X Z, Song Z P, et al. A new approach to earthquake prediction: The Load/Unload Response Ratio (LURR) theory [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1995, 145(3): 701-715.
[12] Yin X C, Wang Y C, Peng K Y, et al. Development of a new approach to earthquake prediction: Load/Unload Response Ratio (LURR) theory[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2000, 157(11-12): 2365-2383.
[13] Yin X C, Mora P, Peng K, et al. Load-Unload Response Ratio and Accelerating Moment/Energy Release Critical Region Scaling and Earthquake Prediction[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2002, 159(10): 2511-2523.
[14] Yin X C, Zhang L P, Zhang H H, et al. LURR′s Twenty Years and its Perspective[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2006, 163(11): 2317-2341.
[15] Yin X C, Zhang L P, Zhang Y X, et al. The Newest Developments of Load-Unload Response Ratio (LURR)[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2008, 165: 711-722.
[16] 姜彤, 马莎, 许兵, 等. 边坡在地震作用下的加卸载响应规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(22): 3803-3807.
[17] 姜彤, 马瑾, 许兵, 等. 基于加卸载响应比理论的边坡动力稳定分析方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(3): 626-631.
[18] Zhang W J, Chen Y M, Zhan L T. Loading/Unloading Response Ratio (LURR) theory applied in predicting deep-seated landslides triggering[J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 82: 234-240.
[19] 贺可强, 周敦云, 王思敬. 降雨型堆积层滑坡的加卸载响应比特征及其预测作用与意义[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(16): 2665-2670.
[20] 张晖辉, 尹祥础, 梁乃刚. 中国大陆地区中强地震前加卸载响应比异常时间尺度的统计研究[J]. 中国地震, 2005, 21(4): 486-495.
[21] 陈棋福, 尹祥础, 马丽. 加卸载响应比的自然概率分布[J]. 中国地震, 1996, 12(3): 269-274.
[22] Nishenko K, Buland R. A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting[J]. Bull Seismol Sol Am, 1987, 77: 1382-1399.
[23] Rikitake T. Assessment of earthquake hazard in the Tokyo area, Japan[J]. Tectonophysics, 1991, 199: 121-131.
[24] 时振梁, 汪良谋, 傅征祥, 等. 中国大陆中长期强震危险性预测方法研究[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社. 1997.
[25] Gutenberg B, Richter C F. Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena[M]. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1954.
[26] Scholz C H. The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes[J]. Bull Seismol Sol Am, 1968, 58(1): 399-415.
[27] Wiemer S, Wyss M. Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: example form Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan[J]. Bull Seismol Sol Am, 2000, 90(4): 859-869.
[28] Gardner J, Knopoff L. Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershock removed, Poissonian[J]? Bull Seismol Sol Am, 1974, 64: 1363-1367.
[29] Wiemer S. A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP[J]. Seism Res Let, 2001, 72 (3): 373-382.
[30] Aki K. A probabilistic synthesis of precursory phenomena[A]. In: Simpson D W, Richards P G. (eds.), Earthquake prediction-an international review[C]. A G U, Washington D C, 1981. 566-574.