地磁垂直强度极化法预测指标体系及其应用研究

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2022.04.013

地震 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 159-174.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2022.04.013

地磁垂直强度极化法预测指标体系及其应用研究

管贻亮¹, 何畅², 樊文杰³, 贺曼秋⁴, 廖晓峰², 李霞⁵, 刘素珍⁶, 袁文秀⁷, 艾萨·伊斯马伊力⁸, 冯丽丽⁵

1.山东省地震局, 山东济南 250014;
2.四川省地震局, 四川成都 610041;
3.云南省地震局, 云南昆明 650224;
4.重庆市地震局, 重庆 401147;
5.青海省地震局, 青海西宁 810001;
6.山西省地震局, 山西太原 030021;
7.浙江省地震局, 浙江杭州 310013;
8.新疆维吾尔自治区地震局, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

收稿日期:2021-09-06 修回日期:2022-04-21 出版日期:2022-10-31 发布日期:2023-03-31
通讯作者: 冯丽丽, 高级工程师。 E-mail: ynufll@sina.com
作者简介:管贻亮(1988-), 男, 山东潍坊人, 工程师, 主要从事地震电磁学研究。
基金资助:
中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH20062); 中国地震局震情跟踪定向工作任务(2022010405)

Research on Prediction Index System of Seismo-magnetic Vertical Intensity Polarization and Its Application

GUAN Yi-liang¹, HE Chang², FAN Wen-jie³, HE Man-qiu⁴, LIAO Xiao-feng², LI Xia⁵, LIU Su-zhen⁶, YUAN Wen-xiu⁷, AISA Yisimayili⁸, FENG Li-li⁵

1. Shandong Earthquake Agency, Ji'nan 250014, China;
2. Sichuan Earthquake Agency, Chengdu 610041, China;
3. Yunnan Earthquake Agency, Kunming 650224, China;
4. Chongqing Earthquake Agency, Chongqing 401147, China;
5. Qinghai Earthquake Agency, Xining 810001, China;
6. Shanxi Earthquake Agency, Taiyuan 030021, China;
7. Zhejiang Earthquake Agency, Hangzhou 310013, China;
8. Earthquake Agency of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830011, China

Received:2021-09-06 Revised:2022-04-21 Online:2022-10-31 Published:2023-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对2015—2021年中国88个地磁台站的秒采样数据进行了垂直强度极化计算, 通过梳理高值异常与后续强震的时空关系, 系统总结了极化值的计算方法和异常判别准则, 建立了可量化的预测指标。极化值高于2倍均方差的台站超过20%且持续3 d及以上则判定为异常。异常区为归一置零极化值大于0.2的区域, 发震优势时间为6个月内, 地震强度与异常区面积呈正相关。根据上述异常判别标准分析提取了16组异常、 32个异常区。对报对、虚报和漏报情况进行了逐一分析, 预报效能评价结果显示, R值为0.53, 高于具有97.5%置信水平的R₀值(R₀=0.234)。 2021年玛多M7.4地震前16 d出现同步性高值异常, 超过20%的台站异常持续3 d, 异常面积14.1×10⁴ km², 符合指标体系中的异常标准, 可以确定为震前极化异常。研究表明, 预测指标体系具有明显的地震预测意义, 捕捉到大震前的极化异常, 可以为后续开展震情判定提供参考。

关键词: 地震地磁, 垂直强度极化, 预报效能, 指标体系, 2021年玛多M7.4地震

Abstract: This paper calculates the vertical intensity polarization by using the second data at 88 geomagnetic stations during 2015 to 2021, and systematically summarizes the calculation method of polarization value and the criterion of polarization anomaly discrimination by combing time-space relationship between high-value anomalies and earthquakes. And on this basis, we extract the quantifiable prediction index, which is defined as: ① more than 20% of stations have polarization values higher than two times of the mean square error and continue three days. ② The anomaly area is a space with normalized zero polarization value greater than 0.2. ③ The dominant time of earthquake occurrence is within six months. ④ The earthquake magnitude is positively related to the size of the anomaly area. According to the above criteria, 16 groups of anomalies (32 abnormal areas) are extracted. The prediction efficiency evaluation results show that R-value (R=0.53) is higher than R₀-value (R₀=0.234) with 97.5% confidence level, based on the analysis of seismic examples of accurate report, false report and missing report. Here, we analyze the magnetic disturbance characteristics before the 2021 Maduo, Qinghai M7.4 earthquake using polarization method. The result shows that the synchronous high-value anomaly occurred 16 days before the earthquake, more than 20% of stations has polarization anomalies that last three days and the anomaly area is 14.1×10⁴ km². This anomaly which is up to the standard of index system can be determined as a pre-earthquake polarization anomaly. The study suggests that the above prediction index system has obvious earthquake prediction significance, can be used to extract the polarization anomaly before strong earthquake, and can provide reference for earthquake situation determination.

Key words: Seismo-magnetic, Vertical intensity polarization, Prediction efficiency, Index system, the 2021 Maduo M7.4 earthquake

中图分类号:

P315.7

管贻亮, 何畅, 樊文杰, 贺曼秋, 廖晓峰, 李霞, 刘素珍, 袁文秀, 艾萨·伊斯马伊力, 冯丽丽. 地磁垂直强度极化法预测指标体系及其应用研究[J]. 地震, 2022, 42(4): 159-174.

GUAN Yi-liang, HE Chang, FAN Wen-jie, HE Man-qiu, LIAO Xiao-feng, LI Xia, LIU Su-zhen, YUAN Wen-xiu, AISA Yisimayili, FENG Li-li. Research on Prediction Index System of Seismo-magnetic Vertical Intensity Polarization and Its Application[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(4): 159-174.

参考文献

[1] 冯志生, 梅卫萍, 张秀霞, 等.中强震前地磁谐波振幅比的趋势性变化特征初步研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2004, 26(1): 50-56.
FENG Zhi-sheng, MEI Wei-ping, ZHANG Xiu-xia, et al. Preliminary study on the characteristics of long and medium term variation for the amplitude ratio of geomagnetic humorous wave before moderate-strong earthquakes[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2004, 26(1): 50-56 (in Chinese).
[2] 冯志生, 李鸿宇, 张秀霞, 等. 地磁谐波振幅比异常与强地震[J]. 华南地震, 2013, 33(3): 9-15.
FENG Zhi-sheng, LI Hong-yu, ZHANG Xiu-xia, et al. The Relationship between strong earthquake and geomagnetic harmonic wave amplitude ratio[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 2013, 33(3): 9-15 (in Chinese).
[3] 冯志生, 王建宇, 蒋延林, 等. 地磁垂直分量日变幅逐日比及其与地震关系的探讨[J]. 华南地震, 2001, 21(2): 20-27.
FENG Zhi-sheng, WANG Jian-yu, JIANG Yan-lin, et al. Ratio of daily variation amplitude of geomagnetic vertical component and its relation with earthquake[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 2001, 21(2): 20-27 (in Chinese).
[4] 冯志生, 林云芳, 王建宇, 等. 江苏地磁加卸载响应比的异常标志体系[J]. 地震, 2000, 20(2): 61-68.
FENG Zhi-sheng, LIN Yun-fang, WANG Jian-yu, et al. Anomaly index system of geomagnetic load-unloading response ratio in Jiangsu area[J]. Earthquake, 2000, 20(2): 61-68 (in Chinese).
[5] 丁鉴海, 刘杰, 余素荣, 等. 地磁日变化异常与强震的关系[J]. 地震学报, 2004, 26(S1): 79-87.
DING Jian-hai, LIU Jie, YU Su-rong, et al. Geomagnetic diurnal-variation anomalies and their relation to strong earthquakes[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2004, 26 (S1): 79-87 (in Chinese).
[6] Molchanov O A, Hayakawa M, Rafalsky V A. Penetration characteristics of electromagnetic emissions from an underground seismic source into the atmosphere, ionosphere, and magnetosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995, 100(A2): 1691-1712.
[7] Molchanov O A, Hayakawa M. Generation of ULF electromagnetic emissions by microfracturing[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1995, 22(22): 3091-3094.
[8] Hayakawa M, Kawate R, Molchanov O A, et al. Results of ultra-low-frequency magnetic field measurements during the Guam earthquake of 8 August 1993[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1996, 23(3): 241-244.
[9] Hattori K, Akinaga Y, Hayakawa M, et al. ULF magnetic anomaly preceding the 1997 Kagoshima earthquake[G]∥Hayakawa M, Molchanov O A. Seismo Electromagnetics: Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling. Tokyo: Terra Scientific Publishing Company, 2002: 19-28.
[10] Molchanov O A, Schekotov A, Fedorov E, et al. Preseismic ULF electromagnetic effect from observation at Kamchatka[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2003, 3(3-4): 203-209.
[11] Hobara Y, Koons H C, Roeder J L, et al. Characteristics of ULF magnetic anomaly before earthquakes[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2004, 29(4-9): 437-444.
[12] 冯志生, 李琪, 卢军, 等. 基于磁通门秒值数据的地震ULF磁场可靠信息提取研究[J]. 华南地震, 2010, 30(2): 1-7.
FENG Zhi-sheng, LI Qi, LU Jun, et al. The seismic ULF geomagnetic reliable information exaction based on fluxgate magnetometer data of second value[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 2010, 30(2): 1-7 (in Chinese).
[13] Li Q, Zhu P Y, Mamatemin A, et al. Detection of ULF electromagnetic emissions as a precursor to two earthquakes in China[J]. Earthquake Science, 2011, 24(6): 601-607.
[14] 李琪, 杨星, 蔡绍平. 极化方法应用于地磁台阵的震例分析[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2015, 10(2): 412-417.
LI Qi, YANG Xing, CAI Shao-ping. Case study of applying polarization method to geomagnetic array data[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2015, 10(2): 412-417 (in Chinese).
[15] 张敏, 赵石柱, 贾路, 等. 极化法在提取震磁异常信息方面的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2020, 35(2): 488-494.
ZHANG Min, ZHAO Shi-zhu, JIA Lu, et al. Applying of polarization method to extract short term seismic anomaly from geomagnetic second data[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2020, 35(2): 488-494 (in Chinese).
[16] 艾萨·伊斯马伊力, 冯志生, 陈界宏, 等. 2020年于田M_S6.4地震前地磁极化异常特征分析[J]. 内陆地震, 2020, 34(3): 295-302.
AISA Yisimayili, FENG Zhi-sheng, CHEN Jie-hong, et al. Analysis on geomagnetic polarization anomalies before Yutian M_S6.4 earthquake in 2020[J]. Inland Earthquake, 2020, 34(3): 295-302 (in Chinese).
[17] 廖晓峰, 冯丽丽, 祁玉萍, 等. 地磁极化方法在阿拉善5.0级地震中的应用研究[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(4): 127-135.
LIAO Xiao-feng, FENG Li-li, QI Yu-ping, et al. Application of geomagnetic polarization method in the Alashan M5.0 earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 2019, 39(4): 127-135 (in Chinese).
[18] 李霞, 冯丽丽, 赵玉红, 等. 青海地区地震磁扰动异常特征研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2021, 43(1): 99-104+112.
LI Xia, FENG Li-li, ZHAO Yu-hong, et al. Characteristics of magnetic disturbance associated with earthquakes in Qinghai area[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2021, 43(1): 99-104+112 (in Chinese).
[19] 樊文杰, 姚休义, 廖晓峰. 2018年云南通海M_S5.0和墨江M_S5.9地震前地磁垂直强度极化异常时空特征研究[J]. 中国地震, 2020, 36(2): 276-283.
FAN Wen-jie, YAO Xiu-yi, LIAO Xiao-feng. Spatial-temporal variations of geomagnetic vertical intensity polarization value associated with the 2018 Tonghai M_S5.0 and Mojiang M_S5.9 earthquake in Yunnan Province[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2020, 36(2): 276-283 (in Chinese).
[20] Thomas J N, Love J J, Johnston M J S, et al. On the reported magnetic precursor of the 1993 Guam earthquake[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2009, 36: L16301.
[21] Masci F. On the seismogenic increase of the ratio of the ULF geomagnetic field components[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2011, 187(1-2): 19-32.
[22] Currie J L, Waters C L. On the use of geomagnetic indices and ULF waves for earthquake precursor signatures[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2014, 119(2): 992-1003.
[23] 管贻亮, 董晓娜, 尹玉振, 等. 2015年尼泊尔M_W7.8地震前磁扰动极化异常特征分析[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(5): 1311-1325.
GUAN Yi-liang, DONG Xiao-na, YIN Yu-zhen, et al. Pre-seismic polarization characteristics of magnetic disturbance of the 2015 M_W7.8 Nepal earthquake[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2021, 43(5): 1311-1325 (in Chinese).
[24] 中国地震局监测预报司. 地震电磁分析预测技术方法工作手册[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2020.
Monitoring and Forecasting Department of China Earthquake Administration. Work manual of seismic electromagnetic analysis and prediction Techniques[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 2020 (in Chinese).
[25] 詹艳, 梁明剑, 孙翔宇, 等. 2021年5月22日青海玛多M_S7.4地震深部环境及发震构造模式[J]. 地球物理学报, 2021, 64(7): 2232-2252.
ZHAN Yan, LIANG Ming-jian, SUN Xiang-yu, et al. Deep structure and seismogenic pattern of the 2021.5.22 Madoi (Qinghai) M_S7.4 earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(7): 2232-2252 (in Chinese).
[26] 王未来, 房立华, 吴建平, 等. 2021年青海玛多M_S7.4地震序列精定位研究[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2021, 51(7): 1193-1202.
WANG Wei-lai, FANG Li-hua, WU Jian-ping, et al. Aftershock sequence relocation of the 2021 M_S7.4 Maduo earthquake, Qinghai, China[J]. Science China Earth Science, 2021, 51(7): 1193-1202 (in Chinese).
[27] 国家地震局科技监测司. 地震学分析预报方法程式指南[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1990.
Science, Technology and Monitoring Department of China Earthquake Administration. Program guide for seismic analysis and prediction methods[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1990 (in Chinese).
[28] 李智敏, 李文巧, 李涛, 等. 2021年5月22日青海玛多M_S7.4地震的发震构造和地表破裂初步调查[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 722-737.
LI Zhi-min, LI Wen-qiao, LI Tao, et al. Seismogenic fault and coseismic surface deformation of the Maduo M_S7.4 earthquake in Qinghai, China: a quick report[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2021, 43(3): 722-737 (in Chinese).
[29] 潘家伟, 白明坤, 李超, 等. 2021年5月22日青海玛多M_S7.4地震地表破裂带及发震构造[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(6): 1655-1670.
PAN Jia-wei, BAI Ming-kun, LI Chao, et al. Coseismic surface rupture and seismogenic structure of the 2021-05-22 Maduo (Qinghai) M_S7.4 earthquake[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(6): 1655-1670 (in Chinese).
[30] 华俊, 赵德政, 单新建, 等. 2021年青海玛多M_W7.3地震InSAR的同震形变场、断层滑动分布及其对周边区域的应力扰动[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 677-691.
HUA Jun, ZHAO De-zheng, SHAN Xin-jian, et al. Coseismic deformation field, slip distribution and coulomb stress disturbance of the 2021 M_W7.3 Maduo earthquake using sentinel-1 InSAR observations[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2021, 43(3): 677-691 (in Chinese).

地磁垂直强度极化法预测指标体系及其应用研究

Research on Prediction Index System of Seismo-magnetic Vertical Intensity Polarization and Its Application

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	席继楼, 孙汉荣, 薛兵, 高尚华, 王同利, 崔博闻, 华培学, 王倩倩, 李珍. 地震监测站网评估指标体系研究[J]. 地震, 2022, 42(4): 149-158.
[2]	廖晓峰, 樊文杰, 邱桂兰, 李雪浩, 杨鹏. 2017年8月8日九寨沟7.0级地震前地磁垂直强度极化短期异常特征分析[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(4): 68-77.
[3]	龚丽文, 陈丽娟, 吕品姬, 张燕, 郭卫英, 肖家强. 黔江台水管仪与垂直摆预报效能对比分析[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(4): 168-179.
[4]	王喜龙, 贾晓东, 钱蕊, 付聪. 2013年芦山M_S7.0地震前南北地震带数字化水位、水温高频信息异常特征及效能分析[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 100-116.
[5]	汤兰荣, 曾新福, 董非非, 罗丽, 查小惠, 郭雨帆, 曾文敬. 华东地区地震空区预报效能评估[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(4): 136-146.
[6]	向阳, 孙小龙, 王博. 基于Molchan图表法的新疆流体资料预报效能检验[J]. 地震, 2018, 38(3): 103-114.
[7]	汤兰荣, 吕坚, 曾新福. 华东地区地震条带预报效能评估[J]. 地震, 2017, 37(4): 134-143.
[8]	刘琦, 闫伟, 李智蓉, 窦玛丽, 马震. 南北地震带定点形变前兆异常指标初建[J]. 地震, 2016, 36(4): 76-88.
[9]	王俊, 邵志刚, 孙小龙, 王熠熙, 向阳, 王喜龙. 川滇地区强震前流体异常特征与预测指标体系初探[J]. 地震, 2016, 36(4): 109-119.
[10]	张国宏, 马照松, 单新建. WebGIS在地震地磁数据共享系统中的初步应用[J]. 地震, 2006, 26(1): 123-130.
[11]	陈学忠, 黄辅琼, 吕晓健. 一种前兆异常预报效能的检验方法[J]. 地震, 2000, 20(3): 25-28.
[12]	吕晓健, 刘蒲雄. 华北地区强震前地震活动的异常增强[J]. 地震, 2000, 20(3): 43-47.
[13]	蔡静观, 张喜玲. 云南地区波速比预报效能的动态分析[J]. 地震, 1999, 19(4): 359-364.
[14]	赵明, 刘元壮, 张天中. 大气电场异常判别及预报效能的统计检验[J]. 地震, 1999, 19(3): 281-287.
[15]	李君英, 唐仲兴. 华北强震水化学参量变化的模糊识别及方法评价^①[J]. 地震, 1999, 19(1): 71-80.