甘东南及邻区地震密集区与历史强震的关系探讨

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2022.02.003

地震 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 33-51.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2022.02.003

甘东南及邻区地震密集区与历史强震的关系探讨

文亚猛^1,2, 袁道阳¹, 张波^2,3, 姚赟胜^2,3, 冯建刚⁴

1.兰州大学地质科学与矿产资源学院, 甘肃省西部矿产资源重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2.中国地震局兰州地震研究所, 甘肃兰州 730000;
3.甘肃兰州地球物理国家野外科学观测研究站, 甘肃兰州 730000;
4.甘肃省地震局, 甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2021-01-12 修回日期:2022-02-12 出版日期:2022-04-30 发布日期:2023-02-17
通讯作者: 袁道阳, 教授。 E-mail: yuandy@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:文亚猛(1995-), 男, 山东菏泽人, 在读博士研究生, 主要从事活动构造与地震活动性研究。
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0901); 中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务费专项(2019IESLZ03); 国家自然科学基金项目(41572197, 42172227)

Discussion on the Relationship Between Earthquake-Intensive Areas and Historical Strong Earthquakes in Southeastern Gansu and Adjacent Areas

WEN Ya-meng^1,2, YUAN Dao-yang¹, ZHANG Bo^2,3, YAO Yun-sheng^2,3, FENG Jian-gang⁴

1. Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources in Western (Gansu Province), School of Earth Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3. Lanzhou National Geophysics Observation and Research Station, Lanzhou 730000, China;
4. Gansu Earth Agency, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2021-01-12 Revised:2022-02-12 Online:2022-04-30 Published:2023-02-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 甘东南及邻区活动断裂发育、新活动性强, 历史及现代强震频发, 是探讨现代地震密集区与历史强震关联性的理想地区, 也是发展和检验网格点密集值法及其适用条件的有利地区。本文选取介于西秦岭北缘断裂带与东昆仑断裂带东段之间, 以走滑活动为主的甘东南及邻区为主要研究区域, 采用网格点密集值法对该区1970年以来仪器记录的1~5级地震进行计算分析, 划分出16个地震密集区。通过分析每个地震密集区内地震活动的时空分布特征, 判断地震密集区与历史强震之间的对应关系, 归纳总结不同震级历史强震对应地震密集区的持续时间, 同时给出运用网格点密集值方法校核甘东南及邻区历史强震的限定条件。研究结果表明, 约87.5%的地震密集区对应着历史强震, 表明二者之间有较密切的关联性; 而且地震震级越大, 其对应地震密集区持续时间越长, 二者之间的边界曲线拟合关系为: T=4.5×10^-7×(M-0.1)^11.15。

关键词: 甘东南及邻区, 历史强震, 地震密集区, 离逝时间, 网格点密集值法

Abstract: The southeast Gansu and adjacent areas have developed active faults, strong new activity, and frequent historical and modern strong earthquakes. It is an ideal area to explore the correlation between the modern medium-small earthquake-intensive areas and historical strong earthquakes. It is also an ideal area for testing and developing grid point dense value methods and their application. This paper selects the Southeast Gansu and neighboring areas between the West-Qinling fault and the eastern section of the Kunlun fault, and is dominated by strike-slip activities as the study area. The method of density at grid notes is used to calculate the instrument records of this area since 1970. Calculated and analyzed the magnitude 1-5 earthquakes and divided 16 earthquake-intensive areas. By analyzing the time distribution characteristics of seismic activity in each earthquake-intensive area, the corresponding relationship between the earthquake-intensive area and the historical strong earthquake is judged, and the duration of the historical strong earthquake-intensive area of different magnitudes is summarized, and the use of grid points is given. The restricted condition of the method is given to correct the historical earthquake records in southeast Gansu and neighbouring areas. The research results show that about 87.5% of historical strong earthquakes are located in the corresponding dense area, indicating that there is a closer correlation between the two; the larger the magnitude, the longer the duration of the dense area. The earthquake elapsed time formula is T=4.5×10^-7×(M-0.1)^11.15.

Key words: Southeast Gansu and neighboring areas, Historical strong earthquake, Earthquake-intensive area, Elapsed time, Method of density at grid nodes

中图分类号:

P315.7

文亚猛, 袁道阳, 张波, 姚赟胜, 冯建刚. 甘东南及邻区地震密集区与历史强震的关系探讨[J]. 地震, 2022, 42(2): 33-51.

WEN Ya-meng, YUAN Dao-yang, ZHANG Bo, YAO Yun-sheng, FENG Jian-gang. Discussion on the Relationship Between Earthquake-Intensive Areas and Historical Strong Earthquakes in Southeastern Gansu and Adjacent Areas[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(2): 33-51.

参考文献

[1] 顾功叙主编. 中国地震目录[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1983.
GU Gong-xu (ed). Chinese earthquakes Catalogue[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1983 (in Chinese).
[2] 国家地震局震害防御司. 中国历史强地震目录[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995.
The Earthquake Disaster Prevention Department of the State Seismological Bureau. Catalogue of Chinese historical strong earthquakes[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1995 (in Chinese).
[3] 谢毓寿, 蔡美彪主编. 中国地震历史资料汇编(第一卷)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1983.
XIE Yu-shou, CAI Mei-biao (ed). The compilation of historical Chinese earthquake data (Vol.1)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1983 (in Chinese).
[4] 谢毓寿, 蔡美彪主编. 中国地震历史资料汇编(第二卷)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1983.
XIE Yu-shou, CAI Mei-biao (ed). The compilation of the historical Chinese earthquake data (Vol.2)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1983 (in Chinese).
[5] 周蕙兰, 房桂荣, 章爱娣, 等.余震序列的持续时间[J]. 地震学报, 1982, 4(1): 45-54.
ZHOU Hui-lan, FANG Gui-rong, ZHANG Ai-di, et al. The duration of the aftershock sequence[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1982, 4(1): 45-54 (in Chinese).
[6] 刘博研, 史保平. M_S8.1昆仑山口西地震和M_S8.0汶川地震余震序列的时空分布特征和持续时间的对比[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(6): 1942-1951.
LIU Bo-yan, SHI Bao-ping. Comparison of duration and spatial and temporal distribution between M_S8.1 Kunlunshan and M_S8.0 Wenchuan earthquake aftershock sequences[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(6): 1942-1951 (in Chinese).
[7] Stein S, Liu M. Long aftershock sequences within continonts and implications for earthquake hazard assessment[J]. Nature, 2009, 462: 89.
[8] 王辉, 刘勉, 李振, 等. 华北地区大地震的长余震序列[J]. 地震, 2013, 33(3): 1-12.
WANG Hui, LIU Mian, LI Zhen, et al. Long aftershock sequence of major earthquakes in North China[J]. Earthquake, 2013, 33(3): 1-12 (in Chinese).
[9] 王泽皋. 大震区的“长期活动”[J]. 地震学报, 1985, 7(3): 254-266.
WANG Ze-gao. The “Long-term activity” of large earthquake aera[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1985, 7(3): 254-266 (in Chinese).
[10] 秦保燕, 陈家超, 冯霞英. 利用现代小震活动性资料确定历史大震震源区[J]. 地震, 1989(1): 19-26.
QIN Bao-yan, CHEN Jia-chao, FENG Xia-ying. Determination of locations and magnitude of great historical earthquakes using activity data of modern small shocks[J]. Earthquake, 1989(1): 19-26 (in Chinese).
[11] 李宇彤, 万波, 李广平. 利用现代小地震分布研究1861年辽宁普兰店东6级地震的震中位置和发震构造[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2010, 31(1): 17-24.
LI Yu-tong, WAN Bo, LI Guang-ping. Research about the east of Pulandian M6 earthquake and its causative structure in 1861 in Liaoning Province by the distribution of modern small earthquakes[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2010, 31(1): 17-24 (in Chinese).
[12] 王健. 地震活动性图象处理的网格点密集值计算方法[J]. 地震学报, 2001, 23(3): 262-267.
WANG Jian. Seismic pattern treatment method through calculation of seismic density at grid nodes[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2001, 23(3): 262-267 (in Chinese).
[13] 王健, 吴宣, 高阿甲, 等. 历史地震参数校订方法探讨--以北京延庆公元294年地震为例[J]. 地震学报, 2010, 32(1): 108-117.
WANG Jian, WU Xuan, GAO A-jia, et al. Probing an approach to amend the parameters historical earthquake: An example of the A. D. 294 Yanqing earthquake in Beijing[J]. Acta Seismologca Sinica, 2010, 32(1): 108-117 (in Chinese).
[14] Wang J, Main I G, Musson R M W. Earthquake clustering in modern seismicity and its relationship with strong historical earthquakes around Beijing, China[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2017, 211(2): 1005-1018.
[15] 张哲. 云南省昆明地区地震密集特征分析[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 2017.
ZHANG Zhe. Analysis on the characteristics of seismic intensity in Kunming, Yunnan Province[D]. Beijing: Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, 2017 (in Chinese).
[16] 张哲, 王健. 1833年云南嵩明8级地震震中区地震密集特征分析[J]. 中国地震, 2018, 34(2): 303-311.
ZHANG Zhe, WANG Jian. Seismic density around the epicenter of the Songming M8.0 earthquake in 1833[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2018, 34(2): 303-311 (in Chinese).
[17] 冯建刚, 姚家骏, 代炜. 青藏高原北部地区小震目录完整性分析[J]. 高原地震, 2010, 22(2): 10-14, 9.
FENG Jian-gang, YAO Jia-jun, DAI Wei. Analysis on minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs in north region of Qinghai-Xizang plateau[J]. Plateau Earthquake Research, 2010, 22(2): 10-14, 9 (in Chinese).
[18] 郑文俊, 袁道阳, 何文贵, 等. 甘肃东南地区构造活动与2013年岷县-漳县M_S6.6级地震孕震机制[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(12): 4058-4071.
ZHENG Wen-jun, YUAN Dao-yang, HE Wen-gui, et a1. Geometric pattern and active tectonics in southeastern Gansu Province: Discussion on seismogenic mechanism of the Minxian-Zhangxian M_S6.6 earthquake on July 22, 2013[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(12): 4058-4071 (in Chinese).
[19] 申世哲. 基于GPS和InSAR数据反演龙门山断裂活动参数[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.
SHEN Shi-zhe. Inversion of Longmenshan fault activity parameters using GPS and InSAR Observations[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2017 (in Chinese).
[20] 袁道阳, 雷中生, 王爱国. 1654年甘肃天水南8级地震补充考证[J]. 地震工程学报, 2017, 39(3): 509-520.
YUAN Dao-yang, LEI Zhong-sheng, WANG Ai-guo. Additional textual criticism of southern Tianshui M8 earthquake in Gansu Province in 1654[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2017, 39(3): 509-520 (in Chinese).
[21] 赵云. 1654年甘肃天水地震烈度和震级考析[J]. 高原地震, 2008, 20(2): 30-33, 29.
ZHAO Yun. Textual research on the intensity and magnitude of Gansu Tianshui earthquake in 1654[J]. Plateau Earthquake Research, 2008, 20(2): 30-33, 29.
[22] 袁道阳, 雷中生, 杨青云, 等. 1879年甘肃武都南8级地震的震灾特征[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50(5): 611-621.
YUAN Dao-yang, LEI Zhong-sheng, YANG Qing-yun, et al. Seismic disaster features of the 1879 southern Wudu M8 earthquake in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2014, 50(5): 611-621 (in Chinese).
[23] 张俊玲. 1879年甘肃武都南8级地震新史料[J]. 西北地震学报, 2007, 29(3): 264-266.
ZHANG Jun-ling. A new historical record about southern Wudu M8 great earthquake in 1879[J]. Northwest Seismological Journal, 2007, 29(3): 264-266 (in Chinese).
[24] 刘白云. 甘东南地区两次8级历史疑难地震发震构造与发震机制研究[D]. 兰州: 中国地震局兰州地震研究所, 2012.
LIU Bai-yun. A study on causative structure and mechanism of two M_S8.0 earthquakes in the southeast area of Gansu[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, 2012 (in Chinese).
[25] 侯康明, 雷中生, 万夫岭, 等. 1879年武都南8级大地震及其同震破裂研究[J]. 中国地震, 2005, 21(3): 295-310.
HOU Kang-ming, LEI Zhong-sheng, WAN Fu-ling, et al. Research on the 1879 southern Wudu M8.0 earthquake and its co-seismic ruptures[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2005, 21(3): 295-310 (in Chinese).
[26] 雷中生, 袁道阳, 葛伟鹏, 等. 734年天水7级地震考证与发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(1): 51-62.
LEI Zhong-sheng, YUAN Dao-yang, GE Wei-peng, et al. Textual research on the Tianshui M7 earthquake in 734 AD and analysis of its causative structure[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2007, 29(1): 51-62 (in Chinese).
[27] 王金烁. 疑难地震区发震构造研究方法与技术应用[D]. 兰州: 中国地震局兰州地震研究所, 2017.
WANG Jin-shuo. Research methods and technical applications of seismogenic structures in difficult seismic areas[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, 2017 (in Chinese).
[28] 袁道阳, 雷中生, 葛伟鹏, 等. 对143年甘谷西7级地震史料的新见解[J]. 西北地震学报, 2007, 29(1): 58-63.
YUAN Dao-yang, LEI Zhong-sheng, GE Wei-peng, et al. A new opinion about the west of Gansu M7.0 earthquake in 143 A.D. in Gansu Province[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 2007, 29(1): 58-63 (in Chinese).
[29] 袁道阳, 雷中生, 何文贵, 等. 公元前186年甘肃武都地震考证与发震构造探讨[J]. 地震学报, 2007, 29(6): 654-663.
YUAN Dao-yang, LEI Zhong-sheng, HE Wen-gui, et al. Textual research of Wudu earthquake in 186 B.C. in Gansu Province, China and discussion on its causative structure[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2007, 29(6): 654-663 (in Chinese).
[30] 袁道阳, 雷中生, 刘兴旺, 等. 公元842年甘肃碌曲地震考证与发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(3): 609-624.
YUAN Dao-yang, LEI Zhong-sheng, LIU Xing-wang, et al. Textural research of Luqu earthquake in 842 AD in Gansu Province and analysis of its causative structure[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2014, 36(3): 609-624 (in Chinese).
[31] 徐岳仁, 杜朋, 李文巧, 等. 1718年通渭M7.5地震滑坡特征分析黄土高原历史强震触发滑坡数据库的应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 2020, 63(3): 1235-1248.
XU Yue-ren, DU Peng, LI Wen-qiao, et al. A case study on AD 1718 Tongwei M7.5 earthquake triggered landslides: Application of landslide database triggered by historical strong earthquakes on the Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2020, 63(3): 1235-1248 (in Chinese).
[32] 何新社, 雷中生, 李少华. 1352年定西-会宁地震史料的新发现[J]. 西北地震学报, 2007, 29(3): 252-255.
HE Xin-she, LEI Zhong-sheng, LI Shao-hua. Some new discoveries in searching historical documents for Dingxi-Huining earthquake in 1352[J]. Northwest Seismological Journal, 2007, 29(3): 252-255 (in Chinese).
[33] 冯建刚, 蒋长胜, 韩立波, 等. 1970年以来甘肃台网地震观测报告收集整理及其重新定位研究[J]. 西北地震学报, 2012, 34(3): 289-293+312.
FENG Jian-gang, JIANG Chang-sheng, HAN Li-bo, et al. Collection and reestablish work for the earthquake observation reports of the Gansu seismographic network since 1970 and earthquake relocation[J]. Northwest Seismological Journal, 2012, 34(3): 289-293+312 (in Chinese).
[34] M7专项工作组. 中国大陆大地震中-长期危险性研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2012.
M7 Project Working Group. Study on the mid-long term potential of large earthquakes on the Chinese continent[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 2012 (in Chinese).
[35] 李承涛, 苏小宁, 孟国杰. 巴颜喀拉块体东北缘GPS应变率空间分布特征及其与2017年九寨沟M_S7.0地震的关系[J]. 地震, 2018, 38(2): 37-50.
LI Cheng-tao, SU Xiao-ning, MENG Guo-jie. The spatial distribution characteristics of GPS strain rate on the northeastern margin of the Bayan Har block and its relationship with the 2017 Jiuzhaigou M_S7.0 earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 2018, 38(2): 37- 50 (in Chinese).
[36] 孟庆筱, 党学会. GPS约束下九寨沟地区断裂带现今运动速率的非连续接触模拟研究[J]. 地震研究, 2018, 41(3): 390-397+488.
MENG Qing-xiao, DANG Xue-hui. Discontinuous contact simulation study of the current motion rate of the fault zone in Jiuzhaigou area under GPS constraints[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 2018, 41(3): 390-397+488 (in Chinese).
[37] 曾宪伟, 闻学泽, 龙锋. 由初至P震相重新定位2017年九寨沟地震序列的主震与M_L≥3.0余震并分析发震构造[J]. 地球物理学报,2019, 62(12): 4604-4619.
ZENG Xian-wei, WEN Xue-ze, LONG Feng. Relocating the main shock and M_L≥3.0 aftershocks of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou sequence using first arriving P-phase only and reanalyzing the seismogenic structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 62(12): 4604-4619 (in Chinese).
[38] 李峰, 刘华国, 贾启超, 等. 青藏高原东缘岷江断裂北段全新世活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(1): 97-106.
LI Feng, LIU Hua-guo, JIA Qi-chao, et al. Holocene activity characteristics of the northern segment of the Minjiang fault on the eastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2018, 40(1): 97-106 (in Chinese).
[39] 俞晶星, 郑文俊, 袁道阳, 等. 西秦岭西段光盖山-迭山断裂带坪定-化马断裂的新活动性与滑动速率[J]. 第四纪研究, 2012, 32(5): 957-967.
YU Jing-xing, ZHENG Wen-jun, YUAN Dao-yang, et al. New activity and slip rate of the Pingding-Huama fault in the Guanggaishan-Dieshan fault zone in the western section of the West Qinling[J]. Quaternary Research, 2012, 32(5): 957-967 (in Chinese).
[40] Zheng W J, Liu X W, Yu J X, et al. Geometry and late Pleistocene slip rates of the Liangdang-Jiangluo fault in the western Qinling mountains, NW China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2016: 687.
[41] 张波, 田勤俭, 王爱国, 等.西秦岭临潭-宕昌断裂第四纪最新活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(1): 72-91.
ZHANG Bo, TIAN Qin-jian, WANG Ai-guo, et al. The latest active characteristics of the Quaternary of the Lintan-Dangchang fault in the West Qinling[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2021, 43(1): 72-91 (in Chinese).
[42] 郑文俊, 雷中生, 袁道阳, 等. 1573年甘肃岷县地震史料考证与发震构造探讨[J]. 中国地震, 2007(1): 75-83.
ZHENG Wen-jun, LEI Zhong-sheng, YUAN Dao-yang, et al. Textual research on the historical data of the 1573 AD Min Xian earthquake in Gansu Province and discussion on its seismogenic structure[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2007, 23(1): 75-83(in Chinese).
[43] 张波. 西秦岭北缘断裂西段与拉脊山断裂新活动特征研究[D]. 中国地震局兰州地震研究所, 2012.
ZHANG Bo. Research on the new activity characteristics of the western segment of the northern margin of the West Qinling fault and the Lajishan fault[D]. Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, 2012 (in Chinese).
[44] 袁道阳, 雷中生, 吴赵, 等. 公元前47年甘肃陇西地震考证与发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(4): 819-836.
YUAN Dao-yang, LEI Zhong-sheng, WU Zhao, et al. Textual Research and Analysis of Seismogenic Structure of Gansu Longxi Earthquake in 47 BC[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2017, 39(4): 819-836 (in Chinese).

甘东南及邻区地震密集区与历史强震的关系探讨

Discussion on the Relationship Between Earthquake-Intensive Areas and Historical Strong Earthquakes in Southeastern Gansu and Adjacent Areas

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	关兆萱, 万永革, 周明月, 王润妍, 宋泽尧, 黄少华, 顾培苑. 2024年新疆乌什M_S7.1地震发震断层产状及其动力学探讨[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(2): 1-11.
[2]	李悦, 马晗宇, 刘振辉, 王熠熙, 邵永新. 天津典型观测井渗透性变化及对玛多7.4级地震响应机理分析[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(2): 33-51.
[3]	荆涛, Boonphor Phetphouthongdy, Chansouk Sioudom, 刘洋洋, 李继庚, 康春丽, 马未宇. 基于潮汐附加构造应力的2013年灯塔M_S5.1地震射出长波辐射变化分析[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(2): 52-62.
[4]	杨彦明, 苏淑娟, 王磊. 2020年呼和浩特市和林格尔M_L4.5地震破裂方向性测定及发震构造分析[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(2): 63-85.
[5]	王婷婷, 边银菊, 任梦依, 杨千里, 侯晓琳. 地震事件分类识别软件[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(2): 104-119.
[6]	宋程, 张永仙, 夏彩韵, 毕金孟, 张小涛, 吴永加, 徐小远. 基于PI方法的华北2019年以来3次M_S≥5.0地震回溯性预测研究[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(2): 120-134.
[7]	刘俊清, 张小刚, 张宇, 蔡宏雷, 陈卓, 包秀敏. 2023年12月18日甘肃积石山M_S6.2地震多点源地震矩张量反演研究[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(2): 169-177.
[8]	黄峰, 熊仁伟, 林敬东, 赵峥, 杨攀新. 嘉黎断裂带中段流域地貌形态指数与新构造活动特征[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(1): 1-18.
[9]	舒甜甜, 罗艳, 朱音杰. 2022年四川泸定M_S6.8地震震源破裂过程及强地面运动模拟[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(1): 19-36.
[10]	吴旭, 薛兵, 李江, 朱小毅, 张兵, 黄诗. 深井地震综合观测系统授时方法设计与实现[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(1): 37-49.
[11]	薄万举, 张立成, 苏国营, 徐东卓, 赵立军. 对强震地形变监测预报方法的思考[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(1): 64-77.
[12]	岳晓媛, 李艳娥, 钟世军, 王薇, 王燕, 马梁. 唐山老震区M≥4.0地震前b值变化异常特征研究[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(1): 94-108.
[13]	贾昕晔, 白少奇, 贾彦杰, 刘芳, 娜热. 内蒙古自治区中西部Lg波衰减及场地响应特征研究[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(1): 109-117.
[14]	陈光齐, 武艳强, 夏明垚, 李志远. 2024年1月1日日本能登半岛7.6级地震: 震源特征、灾害概况与应急响应[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(1): 141-152.
[15]	杨攀新, 熊仁伟, 胡朝忠, 高原. 2023年甘肃积石山6.2级地震发震构造浅析[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(1): 153-159.