由现今地震活动分析鲜水河断裂带中-南段活动习性与强震危险地段

地震 ›› 2005, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 58-66.

由现今地震活动分析鲜水河断裂带中-南段活动习性与强震危险地段

易桂喜^1,2, 范军^1,2, 闻学泽²

1.成都理工大学, 四川成都 610059;
2.四川省地震局,四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2004-03-24 修回日期:2004-07-05 出版日期:2005-01-31 发布日期:2021-11-10
作者简介:易桂喜(1964-), 女, 湖南华容人, 副研究员, 1990年获硕士学位, 主要从事地震学、地震预报方法等研究。
基金资助:
地震科学联合基金项目(102002)资助

Study on faulting behavior and fault-segments for pot- ential strong earthquake risk along the central- southern segment of Xianshuihe fault zone based on current seismicity

YI Gui-xi¹, FANG Jun^1,2, WEN Xue-ze¹

Received:2004-03-24 Revised:2004-07-05 Online:2005-01-31 Published:2021-11-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用最近25年的区域台网地震资料, 基于沿鲜水河断裂带中-南段的b值分布以及多个地震活动参数值的不同组合, 结合震源深度分布、历史强震背景等, 分析了不同断裂段落的现今活动习性, 进而初步判别该断裂带潜在的强震危险地段。结果表明, 鲜水河断裂带中-南段目前存在6个不同活动习性的段落。其中, 道孚段自1981年强震后已再次趋于闭锁, 原因可能与断层面存在“凹凸体”有关, 但应变可能还会进一步积累; 八美段目前处于中偏高应力下的相对静止状态, 推测其断面正处于新的应力积累阶段; 塔公段已有255~300年的无强震期, 目前正处于高应力下的相对闭锁状态, 震源深度剖面上的小震空白区显示出闭锁断层面的轮廓, 应属于未来最可能发生强震的危险地段; 康定、磨西二个段落表现出中偏低应力下的稀疏小震滑动及较频繁小震滑动的状态, 意味着最晚的一次大地震破裂后断层面尚未重新耦合; 石棉段表现出偏高应力下的频繁中-小地震活动与该段的多条断裂交汇有关。

关键词: 地震活动参数, 断裂活动习性, 强震危险性, 鲜水河断裂带

Abstract: In this paper, using the present seismic data from the regional network for the last 25 years and combing with the analysis of depth distribution of relocated hypocenters and historical strong earthquake sources along the central-southern segment of the Xianshuihe fault zone, the authors have studied the current faulting behaviors on different segments of the fault zone, and preliminarily identified the risky fault-segments on which potential strong earthquakes would occur in the near future, based on distribution of b-values along the fault zone and various combinations of values of multiple seismicity parameters on the different fault-segments. The results show that the studied fault zone currently has six segments showing different faulting behavior. Of which, the Daofu segment has tended to be locked again since the 1981 strong earthquake, and the reason could be that the fault plane there probably has an asperity. It seems to need more time to build-up strain. The Bamei segment is now situated in the state of relative rest under middle to high stress, such a state can be explained as that the fault plane is being on its new stage for stress accumulation. The Tagong segment has no strong earthquake occurred for 255 to 300 years. And now is behaving locked under relatively high stress. A gap of current small-quakes on the profile of hypocenter depth seems to outline the locked fault plane of this segment. These suggest that the Tagong segment should be the most possible section of the fault zone for a potential strong earthquake occurring in the near future. The Kangding and Moxi segments are behaving weak slipping of sparse small-quakes and slipping of denser small-quakes respectively, under middle to low stress, showing that the fault planes have not yet re-coupled since the latest large earthquake rupture on the both segments. The Shimian segment displays frequent small-quake activity under middle to high stress, which is probably associated with the locality being at a junction area of several branch faults.

Key words: Seismicity parameter, Faulting behavior, Strong-earthquake risk, Xianshuihe fault zone

中图分类号:

P315.5
P546

易桂喜, 范军, 闻学泽. 由现今地震活动分析鲜水河断裂带中-南段活动习性与强震危险地段[J]. 地震, 2005, 25(1): 58-66.

YI Gui-xi, FANG Jun, WEN Xue-ze. Study on faulting behavior and fault-segments for pot- ential strong earthquake risk along the central- southern segment of Xianshuihe fault zone based on current seismicity[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2005, 25(1): 58-66.

参考文献

[1] 张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 等. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2003, 33 (增刊): 12-20.
[2] 徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 郑荣章. 川滇地区活动块体最新构造变动样式及其动力来源[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2003, 33(增刊): 151-162.
[3] Wiemer S, Wyss M. Mapping the frequency-magnitude distribution in asperities: An improved technique to calculate recurrence times?[J]. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102(B7): 15115-15128.
[4] Wyss M, Schorlemmer D, Wiemer S. Mapping asperities by minima of local recurrence time: San Jacinto-Elsinore fault zones[J]. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105(B4): 7829-7844.
[5] 易桂喜, 闻学泽, 范军, 等. 由地震活动参数分析安宁河-则木河断裂带的现今活动习性及地震危险性[J]. 地震学报, 2004, 26(3): 294-303.
[6] 易桂喜, 闻学泽, 徐锡伟. 山西断陷带太原—临汾部分的强地震平均复发间隔与未来危险段落研究[J]. 地震学报, 2004, 26(4): 387-395.
[7] 闻学泽. 四川西部鲜水河—安宁河—则木河断裂带的地震破裂分段特征[J]. 地震地质, 2000, 22(3): 239-249.
[8] 国家地震局地球物理研究所, 复旦大学历史地理研究所. 中国历史地震图集(清时期)[M]. 北京: 中国地图出版社, 1990. 244.
[9] 国家地震局震害防御司. 中国历史强震目录[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995. 514.
[10] 中国地震局震害防御司. 中国近代地震目录[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1999. 637.
[11] Scholz C H. The frequency-magnitude relation to microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1968, 58: 399-415.
[12] Urbancic T I, Trifu C I, Long J M, et al. Space-time correlation of b values with stress release[J]. Pure Appl. Geophys, 1992, 139: 449-462.
[13] Prugger A F, Gendzwill D J. Microearthquake location: a nonlinear approach that makes use of a simplex stepping procedure[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1988,78(2): 799-815.
[14] Bakun W H, McEvilly T V. Recurrence models and Parkfield, California, earthquakes[J]. J Geophys Res, 1984, 89: 3051-3058.
[15] Aki K. Asperities, barriers, characteristic earthquakes and strong motion prediction[J]. J Geophys Res, 1984, 89(B7): 5867-5872.
[16] Cornell C A, Wu S C, Winterstein S R, et al. Seismic hazard induced by mechanically interactive fault segments[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 1993, 83: 436-449.