地磁垂直分量Z日变幅逐日比及其与磁暴和地震的关系

地震 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 139-146.

地磁垂直分量Z日变幅逐日比及其与磁暴和地震的关系

袁桂平, 李鸿宇, 张贵霞, 潘颖

江苏省地震局, 江苏南京 210014

收稿日期:2017-01-12 出版日期:2018-01-31 发布日期:2019-08-14
通讯作者: 李鸿宇,助理研究员。E-mail:27587295@qq.com。
作者简介:袁桂平(1989-),女,云南曲靖人,研究实习员,主要从事电磁方面研究
基金资助:
江苏省地震局青年科学基金(201609)及震情跟踪项目(2017010411)联合资助

Daily Variation Ratio of Geomagnetic Z Component and its Relationship with Magnetic Storms and Earthquakes

YUAN Gui-ping, LI Hong-yu, ZHANG Gui-xia, PAN Ying

Earthquake Administration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210014, China

Received:2017-01-12 Online:2018-01-31 Published:2019-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地磁垂直分量Z日变幅逐日比是基于变化磁场在地球电导率的作用下会产生一个与变化磁场相反的感应磁场, 该感应磁场不仅包含了外空磁场的信息, 还包含了地下电导率的信息。因此, 相对于地磁场其他成分来说Z分量更多地反应了地下活动的变化, 逐日比是利用前后两日地磁Z分量日变幅相比来提取该异常现象, 但磁暴可能会对逐日比异常判定产生影响。我们取1984年至今江苏区域范围达到逐日比异常判定指标的29个事件结合磁暴以及该异常事件之后和地震的对应关系进行统计分析。研究发现, 无磁暴时逐日比异常和预测范围内地震对应关系达到0.77, 有磁暴时逐日比异常和地震对应关系为0.25。综合分析认为逐日比异常事件发生后, 若该日无磁暴或者Dst指数小于异常第二日, 那么该异常为地震前兆的可能性大概为0.8, 反之则该异常有可能是磁暴的影响而不是来自于地下活动的影响, 需结合其他前兆分析方法进行综合分析, 该研究增强了逐日比异常判定地震地磁前兆信息的可靠性。

关键词: 地磁日变, 垂直分量, 电导率, 磁暴

Abstract: Daily variation ratio of geomagnetic vertical component (Z) is important in the study of earthquake precursor analysis. The variation magnetic field makes an induced magnetic field because of the earth conductivity, and the induced magnetic field includes information from outer magnetic field and underground electrical conductivity, so the geomagnetic field Z component reflects more changes of underground activity than other components. We collected data of Jiangsu area since 1984 and got 29 events of anomalies with day by day ratio, and then carried out a statistical analysis on the relation between them by combining geomagnetic storm and the earthquake after the abnormal events. The study has found that the anomaly event of day by day ratio and earthquake have a good correlation without geomagnetic storm, with coefficient of 0.77, while the corresponding relationship drops to 0.25 with geomagnetic storm. Combining all of the abnormal events, we consider that, after the abnormal event of day by day ratio, the possibility of the abnormal event of day by day ratio being an earthquake precursor will be 0.8 if there is no geomagnetic storm on that day or the Dst index is smaller than that on the second day. Otherwise, the abnormality maybe be caused by geomagnetic storm rather than the influence of underground activity.

Key words: Daily ratio of Geomagnetic vertical component, Electrical conductivity, Geomagnetic precursor, Geomagnetic storm

中图分类号:

P315.7

袁桂平, 李鸿宇, 张贵霞, 潘颖. 地磁垂直分量Z日变幅逐日比及其与磁暴和地震的关系[J]. 地震, 2018, 38(1): 139-146.

YUAN Gui-ping, LI Hong-yu, ZHANG Gui-xia, PAN Ying. Daily Variation Ratio of Geomagnetic Z Component and its Relationship with Magnetic Storms and Earthquakes[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(1): 139-146.

参考文献

[1] 丁鉴海, 黄雪香, 邢如英. 地磁“低点位移”现象及其与地震的关系[J]. 地震学报, 1988, 10(4): 406-414.
[2] 徐文耀. 地球电磁现象物理学[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2009.
[3] 徐文耀. 地磁学[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2003.
[4] 张毅, 顾左文, 顾春雷, 等. 地震地磁监测试验区研究进展[J]. 西北地震学报, 2009, 31(4): 93 402.
[5] 冯志生, 李琪, 卢军, 等. 基于磁通门秒值数据的地震ULF磁场可靠信息提取研究[J]. 华南地震, 2010, 30(2): 1-7.
[6] Rikitake T, Yokoyama I. The Anomalous Behaviour of Geomagnetic Variations of Short Period in Japan and Its Relation to the Subterranean Structure. The 6th report : The results of further observations and some considerations concerning the influences of the seaon geomagnetic va[J]. Genome Medicine, 1955, 2(2): 1-3.
[7] Parkinson W D. The influence of continents and oceans on geomagnetic variations[J]. Geophys J R astr Soc, 1962, 6: 441-449.
[8] Yanagihara K. Time changes of transfer function in the central Japan anomaly of conductivity with special reference to earthquake occurrences[J]. J Geomag Geoelectr, 1976, 28(1): 157-163.
[9] 陈伯舫. 渤海西岸的电导率异常[J]. 地球物理学报, 1974, 17(3): 169-172.
[10] 冯志生, 王建宇, 蒋延林, 等. 地磁垂直分量日变幅逐日比及其与地震关系的探讨[J]. 华南地震, 2001, 21(2): 20-27.
[11] 张建国, 曹轶, 闫俊岗, 等. 地磁Z分量日变幅逐日比法在河北省的应用研究[J].华北地震科学, 2008, 26(1): 1-7.
[12] 戴勇, 高立新, 杨彦明, 等. 甘—青地区地磁垂直分量加卸载响应比、逐日比分析[J]. 华南地震, 2015, 35(3): 1-6.
[13] 游波涛, 何宇飞, 杨中书, 等. 会昌地震台FHD地磁Z分量日变幅逐日比与地震关系初探[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2015, 12: 40-41.
[14] 张翼, 杨福喜, 和锐. 乌鲁木齐台地磁Z分量日变幅及其逐日比地震前兆分析[J].内陆地震, 2007, 21(1): 78-85.
[15] 曾小苹, 续春荣, 赵明, 等. 地球磁场对太阳风的加卸载响应与地震[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 1996, 17(1): 49-53.
[16] 吴迎燕, 徐文耀, 陈耿雄, 等. 磁暴期间几种主要磁扰成分的演化特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 2007, 50(1): 1-9.
[17] 王仕成, 张金生、王哲, 等. 地球变化磁场对地磁匹配制导影响分析[J]. 第四届国家安全地球物理学术研讨会, 2008, 23-30.
[18] 赵旭东, 杜爱民, 陈化然, 等. Sq电流体系的反演与地磁日变模型的建立[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2010, 25(6): 1959-1967.
[19] 袁桂平, 吴迎燕, 张学民. 外源犛等效电流体系电流涡中心电流强度与太阳活动系[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(10): 3457-3468.
[20] 袁桂平, 张学民, 吴迎燕, 等. 汶川8.0级地震前地磁低点位移与内源Sq等效电流体系关系的研究[J]. 地震, 35(3): 102-111.
[21] 冯志生, 李琪, 李鸿宇, 等. 地磁低点位移线两侧异常变化的反相位现象及其解释[J]. 中国地震,2009, 2S(2): 206-213.
[22] 赵凯华, 陈熙谋. 电磁学(上册)[M]. 北京:人民教育出版社, 1978: 281-283.