青藏高原东北缘重力势能与水平偏应力研究

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2022.02.001

地震 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 1-13.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2022.02.001

• • 下一篇

青藏高原东北缘重力势能与水平偏应力研究

王振宇¹, 付广裕², 刘泰³, 郭凌冬³, 陈伟³, 房婷婷³

1.中国地震局地球物理研究所, 北京 100081;
2.中国地质大学(北京)地球物理与信息技术学院, 北京 100191;
3.中国地震局地震预测重点实验室(地震预测研究所), 北京 100036

收稿日期:2021-03-26 修回日期:2022-01-14 出版日期:2022-04-30 发布日期:2023-02-17
通讯作者: 付广裕, 教授。 E-mail: fugy@cugb.edu.cn
作者简介:王振宇(1993-), 男, 辽宁辽阳人, 博士研究生, 主要从事重力潮汐以及岩石圈均衡研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41874003); 中国地震科学实验场专项(2019CSES0101); 中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务费专项(CEAIEF20220212)

Study on Gravity Potential Energy and Horizontal Deviatoric Stress of the Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

WANG Zhen-yu¹, FU Guang-yu², LIU Tai³, GUO Ling-dong³, CHEN Wei³, FANG Ting-ting³

1. Institute of Geophysics, CEA, Beijing 100081, China;
2. School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100191, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Forecast, Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, CEA, Beijing 100036, China

Received:2021-03-26 Revised:2022-01-14 Online:2022-04-30 Published:2023-02-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 偏应力场的定量研究结果对于揭示区域构造运动具有重要意义。本文使用重力与GPS联合观测数据计算青藏高原东北缘的重力势能, 估计其产生的水平偏应力, 并与全球应变率图(GSRM)进行对比分析, 发现研究区域的重力势能分布形态总体具有青藏高原高、鄂尔多斯块体低的特点。重力势能最高值位于青藏高原北部, 量值为1.53×10¹⁴ N/m, 最低值位于秦岭南部, 量值为1.45×10¹⁴ N/m。由重力势能差异引起的偏应力在青藏高原北部、鄂尔多斯块体南部和秦岭东段较大, 最大值达14 MPa左右, 位于青藏高原与阿拉善块体交界处。

关键词: 青藏高原东北缘, 重力势能, 动力地形, 水平偏应力

Abstract: A quantitative study on the deviatoric stress field of the Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is of vital importance to reveal the tectonic motion of this region. Based on the in-situ gravity and GPS observations, the current study calculates the gravity potential energy of the study area and evaluates the induced horizontal deviatoric stress, which is then analyzed and compared to the Global Strain Rate Map (GSRM). The results indicate that the gravity potential energy of the study area is featured by a characteristic of high values at the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and low values at the Ordos Block. The highest value of gravity potential energy locates at the northern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, with a magnitude of 1.53×10¹⁴ N/m, whereas the lowest value of gravity potential energy locates at the southern Qinling Orogen, with a magnitude of 1.45×10¹⁴ N/m. The deviatoric stress induced by the difference of gravity potential energy is relatively large at the northern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, southern Ordos Block, and eastern Qinling Orogen. The largest stress occurs at the conjunction region between the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the Alax Block, with a magnitude of about 14 MPa.

Key words: the Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Gravity potential energy, Dynamic topography, Horizontal deviatoric stress

中图分类号:

P315.7

王振宇, 付广裕, 刘泰, 郭凌冬, 陈伟, 房婷婷. 青藏高原东北缘重力势能与水平偏应力研究[J]. 地震, 2022, 42(2): 1-13.

WANG Zhen-yu, FU Guang-yu, LIU Tai, GUO Ling-dong, CHEN Wei, FANG Ting-ting. Study on Gravity Potential Energy and Horizontal Deviatoric Stress of the Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2022, 42(2): 1-13.

参考文献

[1] England P, Houseman G. Extension during continental convergence, with application to the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1989, 94(B12): 17561-17579.
[2] Molnar P, England P, Martinod J. Mantle dynamics, uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, and the Indian monsoon[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1993, 31(4): 357-396.
[3] Schmalholz S M, Kaus B J P, Burg J P. Stress-strength relationship in the lithosphere during continental collision[J]. Geology, 2009, 37(9): 775-778.
[4] Thielmann M, Kaus B J P. Shear heating induced lithospheric-scale localization: Does it result in subduction?[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2012, 359-360: 1-13.
[5] Hirth G, Tullis J. The brittle-plastic transition in experimentally deformed quartz aggregates[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1994, 99(B6): 11731-11747.
[6] Moulas E, Schmalholz S M, Podladchikov Y, et al. Relation between mean stress, thermodynamic, and lithostatic pressure[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2019, 37(1): 1-14.
[7] Allmann B P, Shearer P M. Global variations of stress drop for moderate to large earthquakes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2009, 114(B1): 1-22.
[8] Ghosh A, Holt W E. Plate motions and stresses from global dynamic models[J]. Science, 2012, 335(6070): 838-843.
[9] England P, Molnar P. Active deformation of Asia: From kinematics to dynamics[J]. Science, 1997, 278(5338): 647-650.
[10] Flesch L M, Holt W E, Haines A J, et al. Dynamics of the Pacific-North American plate boundary in the western United States[J]. Science, 2000, 287(5454): 834-836.
[11] Flesch L M, Holt W E, Haines A J, et al. The dynamics of western North America: Stress magnitudes and the relative role of gravitational potential energy, plate interaction at the boundary and basal tractions[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2007, 169(3): 866-896.
[12] Ghosh A, Holt W E, Wen L, et al. Joint modeling of lithosphere and mantle dynamics elucidating lithosphere-mantle coupling[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008, 35(16): L16309.
[13] Humphreys E D, Coblentz D D. North American dynamics and western US tectonics[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2007, 45(3): 1-30.
[14] Wang X G, Holt W E, Ghosh A. Joint modeling of lithosphere and mantle dynamics: Evaluation of constraints from global tomography models[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2015, 120(12): 8633-8655.
[15] Ghosh A, Holt W E, Flesch L M, et al. Gravitational potential energy of the Tibetan Plateau and the forces driving the Indian plate[J]. Geology, 2006, 34(5): 321-324.
[16] Bassin C. The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America[C]//EOS Transaction AGU. 81: Fall Meeting Supplementary Abstract, 2000.
[17] 张健, 石耀霖. 青藏高原隆升及伸展变形中的重力位能[J]. 地球物理学报, 2002, 45(2): 226-232.
ZHANG Jian, SHI Yao-lin. The role of gravitational potential energy in raising and spreading of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2002, 45(2): 226-232 (in Chinese).
[18] Schmalholz S M, Duretz T, Hetényi G, et al. Distribution and magnitude of stress due to lateral variation of gravitational potential energy between Indian lowland and Tibetan plateau[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2019, 216(2): 1313-1333.
[19] Laske G, Masters G, Ma Z, et al. Update on CRUST1.0-A 1-degree global model of Earth’s crust[C]. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 15, Abstract EGU2013-2658, 2013.
[20] Kreemer C, Holt W E, Haines A J. An integrated global model of present-day plate motions and plate boundary deformation[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2003, 154(1): 8-34.
[21] Wang Z Y, Fu G Y, She Y W. Crustal density structure, lithosphere flexure mechanism, and isostatic state throughout the Qinling Orogen revealed by in situ dense gravity observations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2018, 123(11): 10026-10039.
[22] Ghosh A, Holt W E, Flesch L M. Contribution of gravitational potential energy differences to the global stress field[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2009, 179(2): 787-812.
[23] Amante C, Eakins B W. ETOPO1 arc-minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis[R]. NOAA technical memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA, 2009.
[24] Becker T W, Lowry A R, Faccenna C, et al. Western US intermountain seismicity caused by changes in upper mantle flow[J]. Nature, 2015, 524(7566): 458-461.
[25] Cazenave A, Souriau A, Dominh K. Global coupling of Earth surface topography with hotspots, geoid and mantle heterogeneities[J]. Nature, 1989, 340(6228): 54-57.
[26] Panasyuk S V, Hager B H. Models of isostatic and dynamic topography, geoid anomalies, and their uncertainties[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2000, 105(B12): 28199-28209.
[27] Steinberger B, Schmeling H, Marquart G. Large-scale lithospheric stress field and topography induced by global mantle circulation[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2001, 186(1): 75-91.
[28] Lithgow-Bertelloni C, Guynn J H. Origin of the lithospheric stress field[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2004, 109(B1).
[29] Hager B H, Clayton R W, Richards M A, et al. Lower mantle heterogeneity, dynamic topography and the geoid[J]. Nature, 1985, 313(6003): 541-545.
[30] Watts A B. Isostasy and flexure of the lithosphere[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[31] 佘雅文, 付广裕, 王灼华, 等. 重力与地形数据揭示的巴颜喀拉块体东缘垂向构造应力场[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(6): 2480-2492.
SHE Ya-wen, FU Guang-yu, WANG Zhuo-hua, et al. Vertical tectonic stress in eastern margin of Bayan Har block revealed by gravity and terrain data[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60(6): 2480-2492 (in Chinese).
[32] Wang Z Y, Fu G Y. Gravity analysis of the offset between crustal structure and topography in the Liupan Shan, northeast Tibetan Plateau[J]. Earth, Planets and Space, 2020, 72(1): 1-9.
[33] Flesch L M, Haines A J, Holt W E. Dynamics of the India-Eurasia collision zone[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2001, 106(B8): 16435-16460.
[34] Tian X B, Teng J W, Zhang H S, et al. Structure of crust and upper mantle beneath the Ordos Block and the Yinshan Mountains revealed by receiver function analysis[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2011, 184(3-4): 186-193.

青藏高原东北缘重力势能与水平偏应力研究

Study on Gravity Potential Energy and Horizontal Deviatoric Stress of the Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨攀新, 熊仁伟, 胡朝忠, 高原. 2023年甘肃积石山6.2级地震发震构造浅析[J]. 地震, 2024, 44(1): 153-159.
[2]	张国庆, 梁伟锋. 青藏高原东北缘ALOS AW3D30高程模型和EIGEN-6C4自由空气重力异常模型精度分析[J]. 地震, 2023, 43(1): 93-104.
[3]	杨业鑫, 孟国杰, 吴伟伟, 赵国强. 青藏高原东北缘地壳应变与应力特征研究[J]. 地震, 2022, 42(4): 1-13.
[4]	徐化超, 王辉, 曹建玲. 青藏高原东北缘主要断裂滑动速率及其动力学意义[J]. 地震, 2018, 38(3): 13-23.
[5]	叶茂盛, 孟国杰, 苏小宁. 青藏高原东北缘主要断裂闭锁特征和滑动亏损研究[J]. 地震, 2018, 38(3): 1-12.
[6]	杨博, 朱爽, 杨国华, 周伟, 冯胜涛, 陈欣. 岷县漳县M_S6.6地震前区域形变场的特征[J]. 地震, 2014, 34(2): 115-123.
[7]	李强, 江在森, 武艳强, 赵静, 魏文薪, 刘晓霞. 汶川地震震后短期青藏高原东北缘地壳变形特征成因讨论[J]. 地震, 2013, 33(3): 124-132.
[8]	祝意青, 刘芳, 付广裕, 赵云峰. 汶川地震前后青藏高原东北缘重力场动态变化研究[J]. 地震, 2012, 32(2): 88-94.