东昆仑断裂带地震复发间隔及地震危险性

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 东昆仑断裂带是青藏高原东北部一条重要的活动断裂, 构成了巴颜喀拉块体的北边界。根据阿尼玛卿山两侧滑动速率和历史地震的差异, 将断裂带分为东西两个部分。滑动速率由西向东递减, 近百年的历史地震产生的破裂基本覆盖了西部和东部的一部分。随着巴颜喀拉块体周缘强震的持续发生, 作为块体北边界的东昆仑断裂带的地震空区及地震潜势研究变得更加重要。近些年通过对东昆仑断裂带不同段的研究得到了较多的滑动速率和古地震序列数据, 为评价断裂带未来百年地震危险性提供了有利条件。利用NB模型中的对数正态分布方法, 得到了东昆仑断裂带在未来100 a的发震概率, 研究表明, 东部(玛曲段)发震概率相对较高, 需要进一步关注。

关键词: 东昆仑断裂带, 古地震, 地震潜势, 玛曲, 塔藏, NB模型

Abstract: East Kunlun fault zone is an important fracture in the northeast of Qinghai—Tibet Plateau and constitutes the northern boundary of Bayan La block. According to the differences of sliding rate and historical earthquakes on both sides of Annemaqen Shan Mountains, we divide the fault zone into two parts, the eastern and the western. Slip rate gradients decrease from west to east, and the rupture caused by historical earthquake in the past hundred years basically covers the western and a part of the eastern parts. With the continuous occurrences of strong earthquakes in the edge of Bayan La block, the study on seismic gap and seismic potential of the eastern Kunlun fault are becoming more and more important. Recently, through the study of different sections of the eastern Kunlun fault, more slip rates and paleo-earthquake sequence data have been obtained, which provide favorable conditions for evaluating the potential dangers in the next 100 years. We estimate earthquake probability in the next 100 years for the eastern Kunlun fault by the NB logarithm-normal distribution model. The Maqu segment of the eastern part has a higher earthquake probability.

Key words: Earthquake potential, Paleo-earthquake, East Kunlun fault zone, The eastern Kunlun fault zone

中图分类号:

P315.7

蔡瑶瑶, 张军龙. 东昆仑断裂带地震复发间隔及地震危险性[J]. 地震, 2018, 38(3): 58-65.

CAI Yao-yao, ZHANG Jun-long. Repeating Intervals and Potentials of Earthquakes in the Eastern Kunlun Fault Zone[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(3): 58-65.

参考文献

[1] 青海省地震局, 中国地震局地壳应力研究所. 东昆仑活动断裂带[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1999.
[2] Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Revisiting Late Quaternary Slip-rate along the Maqu Segment of the Eastern Kunlun Fault, Northeast Tibet[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(2): 486-502.
[3] 李陈侠. 东昆仑断裂带东段(玛沁—玛曲)晚第四纪长期滑动习性研究[D]. 北京:中国地震局地质研究所, 2009.
[4] 陈长云, 任金卫, 孟国杰, 等. 巴颜喀拉块体东部活动块体的划分、形变特征及构造意义[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56: 4125-4141.
[5] Xu X, Yu G, Klinger Y, et al. Reevaluation of surface rupture parameters and faulting segmentation of the 2001 Kunlunshan earthquake (M_W7.8), northern Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111(B5): B05316.
[6] 张军龙, 申旭辉, 徐岳仁, 等. 汶川8级大地震的地表破裂特征及分段[J]. 地震, 2009, 29(1): 149-154.
[7] 张军龙, 陈长云, 胡朝忠, 等. 玉树M_S7.1地震地表破裂带及其同震位移分布[J]. 地震, 2010, 30(3): 1-12.
[8] 张军龙. 青藏高原西北于田地区强震后地震迁移图像与活动构造关系讨论[J]. 地震, 2014, 34: 20-29.
[9] 张国民, 田勤俭, 王辉. 可可西里—东昆仑活动构造带强震活动研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2003, 10(1): 39-46.
[10] 李建军, 张军龙, 蔡瑶瑶. 东昆仑断裂带历史地震、古地震及地震空区讨论[J]. 地震, 2017, 37: 103-111.
[11] M7专项工作组. 中国大陆大地震中-长期危险性研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2012.
[12] 闻学泽. 活动断层地震潜势的定量评估[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995.
[13] Van Der Woerd J, Tapponnier P, Ryerson F J, et al. Uniform postglacial slip-rate along the central 600 km of the Kunlun Fault (Tibet), from Al-26, Be-10, and C-14 dating of riser offsets, and climatic origin of the regional morphology[J]. Geophys J Int, 2002, 148(3):356-388.
[14] Zhang J, Ren J, Chen C, et al. The Late Pleistocene activity of the eastern part of east Kunlun fault zone and its tectonic significance[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2014, 57(3): 439-453.
[15] 胡道功, 吴中海, 吴珍汉, 等. 东昆仑断裂带库赛湖段晚第四纪古地震研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2007, 27(1): 27-34.
[16] Lin A M, Guo J M. Nonuniform Slip Rate and Millennial Recurrence Interval of Large Earthquakes along the Eastern Segment of the Kunlun Fault, Northern Tibet[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 2008, 98(6): 2866-2878.
[17] 胡道功, 叶培盛, 吴珍汉, 等. 东昆仑断裂带西大滩段全新世古地震研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2006, 26(6): 1012-1020.
[18] 付俊东, 任金卫, 张军龙, 等. 东昆仑断裂东段下热尔断裂活动特征初步研究[J]. 中国地震, 2011, 27(3): 248-259.
[19] Zhang J L. On fault evidence for a large earthquake in the late fifteenth century, Eastern Kunlun fault, China[J]. Journal of Seismology, 2017, 21(6): 1397-1405.
[20] Bonilla M G, Mark R K, Lienkaemper J J. Statistical relations among earthquake magnitude, surface rupture length, and surface fault displacement[J]. Seis Soc Am Bull, 1984, 74(6): 2379-2411.