陇县—岐山—马召断裂几何结构特征

地震 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 66-80.

陇县—岐山—马召断裂几何结构特征

陈庆宇, 熊仁伟, 田勤俭

中国地震局地震预测研究所, 地震预测重点实验室, 北京 100036

收稿日期:2018-01-23 发布日期:2019-08-15
作者简介:陈庆宇(1994-),男,内蒙古满洲里人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事活动构造等研究。
基金资助:
中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务重点项目(2016IES010201)

Segmentary Characteristics of the Geometrical Structure of the Longxian—Qishan—Mazhao Active Fault

CHEN Qing-Yu, XIONG Ren-Wei, TIAN Qin-Jian

Key laboratory of Earthquake Prediction, Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, CEA, Beijing 100036, China

Received:2018-01-23 Published:2019-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 陇县—岐山—马召断裂是陇县—宝鸡断裂带中规模最大、活动性最强的一支, 其几何特征与晚第四纪活动性对认识鄂尔多斯块体西南缘的地震构造特征与构造变形模式具有重要意义。在对高分二号卫星遥感影像解译(空间分辨率0.8 m)和1∶50000 DEM分析的基础上, 结合野外地质调查, 确定断裂的几何展布。陇县—岐山—马召断裂整体走向为300°~315°, 西北起于草碧镇, 向东南经千阳、岐山、扶风南部一线的黄土台塬, 经哑柏镇抵于秦岭北马召镇, 全长约130 km。断裂晚更新世以来整体表现出左旋走滑为主的运动特征, 在部分段落具一定垂直运动分量。根据断裂的阶区、断裂交会和分离、断裂晚第四纪活动性等特征将陇县—岐山—马召断裂分为三段, 自西北向东南依次为草碧—田家沟段、底寺—古水段和绛帐—马召段。其中, 草碧—田家沟段又可细分为左阶排列的两个次级段, 即草碧—沙坳段与枣子沟—田家沟段。陇县—岐山—马召断裂在岐山县北与北山山前断裂交会, 为草碧—田家沟段和底寺—古水段的一个分段标志, 陇县—岐山—马召断裂与北山山前断裂交会后有3 km行迹模糊。陇县—岐山—马召断裂在古水村与渭河断裂交会, 为底寺—古水段和绛帐—马召段的分段标志, 绛帐—马召段以与秦岭北缘断裂交会为标志分段。

关键词: 陇县—宝鸡断裂带, 陇县—岐山—马召断裂, 几何结构, 鄂尔多斯西南缘

Abstract: The Longxian—Qishan—Mazhao fault is the largest and most active one in the Longxian—Baoji fault zone. The characteristics of its Late Quaternary tectonic activity and geometrical structure are of great significance for understanding the seismic deformation and tectonic deformation pattern of the southwestern margin of the Ordos block. In this study,based on the interpretation of high-resolution satellite remote sensing images and analysis of DEM(1: 50000), combined with fieldwork, geometric distribution of the fault was determined. Longxian—Qishan—Mazhao fault strikes 300 °~315 °, starting from Caobi town, passing through Qianyang County, Qishan County, fault scarp of the Loess Plateau in the southwestern of Fufeng County, Yabai town to Mazhao town in the north of Qinling piedmont, extending about 130 km. Since the Late Pleistocene, the whole movement of left-lateral strike-slip has been characterized, and normal component has been found in some segments. According to the segmentary signs of strike-slip faults, such as the fracture zone, fault intersection, and separation, Longxian—Qishan—Mazhao fault was divided into three segments. From northwest to southeast, there are Caobi—Tianjiagou segment, Disi—Gushui segment and Jiangzhang—Mazhao segment respectively. Caobi—Tianjiagou segment can be divided into two left stepped form sub-segments, which are Caobi—Sha'ao segment and Zaozigou—Tianjiagou segment. Longxian—Qishan—Mazhao fault intersects with the Beishan fault at the north of Qishan county, which can be taken as an indicator of segmentation of Caobi—Tianjiagou segment and Disi—Gushui segment. There is a 3 km loss of fracture in this area. Longxian—Qishan—Mazhao fault intersects with the Weihe fault at the Gushui village, which can be taken as an indicator of segmentation of Disi—Gushui segment and Jiangzhang—Mazhao segment. Jiangzhang—Mazhao segment intersects with north piedmont of Qinling fault is a sign of segmentation.

Key words: Active fault, Geometric distribution, The Longxian—Baoji faults zone, Southwestern Ordos

中图分类号:

P315.7

陈庆宇, 熊仁伟, 田勤俭. 陇县—岐山—马召断裂几何结构特征[J]. 地震, 2018, 38(3): 66-80.

CHEN Qing-Yu, XIONG Ren-Wei, TIAN Qin-Jian. Segmentary Characteristics of the Geometrical Structure of the Longxian—Qishan—Mazhao Active Fault[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(3): 66-80.

参考文献

[1] 国家地震局. 鄂尔多斯周缘活动断裂系[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1988.
[2] 邓起东, 张培震, 冉勇康, 等. 中国活动构造基本特征[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2002, 32(12): 1020-1030.
[3] 陕西省地震局. 秦岭北缘活动断裂带[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1996.
[4] 孙昭民, 邓起东. 六盘山东麓断裂和陇县—宝鸡断裂带基本特征和相互关系∥中国活断层研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1994.
[5] 彭建兵. 渭河断裂带的构造演化与地震活动[J]. 地震地质, 1992, 14(2): 19-26.
[6] 师亚芹. 陇县—岐山—周至断裂的运动方式与该断裂带地震活动特点分析[J]. 地震工程学报, 1996, (2): 84-86.
[7] 刘锁旺, 甘家思, 姚运生, 等. 西秦岭北缘断裂和海原断裂的走滑转换变形及其与陇山地块的相互作用[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 1997, (3): 73-83.
[8] 石卫. 陇县—宝鸡断裂带发育特征及活动性分析[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2011.
[9] 宝鸡市地震小区划项目组. 宝鸡市小区划报告[R]. 2011.
[10] 史志刚, 袁道阳, 李廷栋, 等. 公元600年秦陇地震考证与发震构造探讨[J]. 科技导报, 2013, 31(12): 48-52.
[11] Lin A, Rao G, Yan B. Flexural fold structures and active faults in the northern–western Weihe Graben, central China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 114: 226-241.
[12] 李新男. 鄂尔多斯西南缘活动构造几何图像、运动特征及构造变形模式[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所, 2017.
[13] 冯希杰, 戴王强, 董星宏. 从陕西省扶风县古水路堑剖面剖析渭河断裂第四纪活动[J]. 中国地震, 2003, 19(2): 188-193.
[14] 冯希杰, 田勤俭, 申旭辉. 渭河断裂西段活动差异性分析[J]. 地质论评, 2003, 49(3): 233-238.
[15] 陕西省地质矿产局. 地质科技成果汇编, 第1集, 1953—1982[M]. 陕西省地质矿产局, 1989.
[16] 国家地震局地质研究所. 海原活动断裂带[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1990.
[17] 丁国瑜, 田勤俭, 孔凡臣, 等. 活断层分段: 原则、方法及应用[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1993.
[18] Alle, 闻学泽, 罗灼礼, 等. 鲜水河全新世断裂带的分段性, 几何特征及其地震构造意义[J]. 地震学报, 1989, (4): 362-372.
[19] 李小强. 六盘山东麓断裂带晚第四纪活动性研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 2015.
[20] 刘兴旺, 袁道阳, 吴赵, 等. 六盘山断裂带活动性差异及其对六盘山隆升的影响[J]. 第四纪研究, 2016, 36(4): 898-906.
[21] 丁国瑜, 田勤俭, 申旭辉, 等. 青藏高原东北隅弧束区新构造运动的阶段和总量[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 2017.
[22] 张宏卫, 邓起东. 不对称盆地形成机制探讨: 以渭河盆地为例[J]. 中国地震, 1992, (1): 26-35.