基于接收函数方法研究川滇块体东边界的地壳厚度和泊松比

地震 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 55-64.

基于接收函数方法研究川滇块体东边界的地壳厚度和泊松比

张宝文, 赵翠萍, 周连庆

中国地震局地震预测研究所, 北京 100036

收稿日期:2014-06-19 出版日期:2015-01-31 发布日期:2020-06-22
作者简介:张宝文(1988-), 女, 陕西宁强人, 在读硕士研究生, 主要从事接收函数等方面研究。
基金资助:
南北地震带中部潜在强震危险区的监测和研究(I2011IES010104)

Crustal Thickness and Poisson′s Ratio beneath the East Boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan Block from Receiver Functions

ZHANG Bao-wen, ZHAO Cui-ping, ZHOU Lian-qing

Institute of Earthquake Science, CEA, Beijing 100036, China

Received:2014-06-19 Online:2015-01-31 Published:2020-06-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文使用沿川滇块体东边界主要断裂带(安宁河、则木河、小江断裂带)布设的37个临时台站和四川区域台网14个固定台站记录的远震波形资料, 用时间域迭代反褶积方法提取接收函数, 采用接收函数H-κ反演方法得到了30个台站下方的地壳厚度和泊松比。研究结果表明, 川滇块体东边界的地壳厚度表现为自西向东由60 km左右向华南块体(35 km左右)逐渐减薄的过渡带特征: 以安宁河—大凉山断裂带为界, 以西地壳厚度平均在54 km左右, 以东作为华南块体与川滇块体的交界前缘, 地壳厚度在42～48 km之间。以小江断裂带与则木河断裂带交汇处为界, 其南北两侧的地壳岩性和组分差异明显。小江断裂带北段泊松比值在0.20～0.27之间, 表明其地壳物质组分主要为中基性岩石。而以北的安宁河、则木河及马边—盐津断裂带的泊松比值大多位于0.27～0.32之间。安宁河—则木河断裂带附近多数台站的泊松比值>0.30, 可能是部分熔融造成的。

关键词: 地壳厚度, 泊松比, 川滇块体东边界, 接收函数

Abstract: Teleseismic waveform data from 38 temporary stations along the main fault zone (Anninghe, Zemuhe, Xiaojiang fault zone) of the eastern boundary of the Sichuan—Yunnan block and 14 permanent stations in Sichuan regional seismic network were used to compute crustal thickness and velocity ratio (Vp/Vs) of 30 stations by time domain iterative deconvolution extracting receiver function and the H inversion method. The results show that crustal thickness becomes thinner gradually from 60 km from west to east to that 35 km in South China block. In the west of Anninghe—Daliangshan fault zone, the average crust thickness is about 54 km, while in the east, as the front junction between South China block and Sichuan—Yunnan block, the average crust thickness is 42～48 km. Crust lithology and component obviously differ between Xiaojiang fault and that to its nouthern region. The poisson′s ratio between 0.20 and 0.27 at the northern segment of Xiaojiang fault zone indicates that its crust is mainly composed of basic rock. Nevertheless, the poisson′s ratio that is mostly lies between 0.27 and 0.32 at the Anninghe, Zemuhe and Mabian—Yanjin fault zones. Below most of the stations on Anninghe—Zemuhe fault zone, there is an ultra high Poisson′s ratio that greater than 0.30, which is inferred as evidence of local partial melt.

Key words: Crustal thickness, Poisson′s ratio, Receiver function, Sichuan—Yunnan block

中图分类号:

P315.7

张宝文, 赵翠萍, 周连庆. 基于接收函数方法研究川滇块体东边界的地壳厚度和泊松比[J]. 地震, 2015, 35(1): 55-64.

ZHANG Bao-wen, ZHAO Cui-ping, ZHOU Lian-qing. Crustal Thickness and Poisson′s Ratio beneath the East Boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan Block from Receiver Functions[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2015, 35(1): 55-64.

参考文献

[1] 邓起东, 张培震, 冉勇康, 等. 中国活动构造基本特征[J]. 中国科学D辑, 2002, 32(2): 352-376.
[2] 孙洁, 晋光文, 白登海. 青藏高原东缘地壳、上地幔电性结构探测及其构造意义[J]. 中国科学D辑, 2003, 33(增刊): 173-180.
[3] M7专项工作组. 中国大陆大地震中-长期危险性研究[M]. 2012年6月第一版第一次. 北京: 地震出版社, 2012, 187-248.
[4] Bai D H, Unsworth M J, Meju M A, et al. Crustal deformation of the eastern Tibetan Plateau revealed by magnetotelluric imaging[J]. Nat Geosci, 2010, 11: 1-5.
[5] 杨卓欣, 王夫运, 段永红, 等. 川滇活动地块东南边界基底结构盐源—西昌—昭觉—马湖深地震测深剖面结果[J]. 地震学报, 2011, 33(4): 431-442.
[6] Wang C Y, Han WB, Wu JP, et al. Crustal structure beneath the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau and its tectonic implications[J]. J Geophy Res, 2007, 112: B07307.
[7] 王椿镛, 王溪莉, 苏伟, 等. 青藏高原东缘下地壳流动的地震学证据[J]. 四川地震, 2006, 4: 1-4.
[8] Xu Z J, Song X D. Joint inversion for crustal and Pn velocities and Moho depth in Eastern Margin of theTibetan Plateau[J]. Tectonophysics, 2010, 491: 185-193.
[9] Li H Y, Su W, Wang CY, et al. Ambient noise Love wave tomography in the eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau[J]. Tectonophysics, 2010, 491: 194-204.
[10] Yao H J, Beghein C, Hilst R D. Surface wave array tomography in SE Tibet from ambient seismicnoise and two-station analysis-II[J]. Crustal and upper-mantlestructure Geophys J Int, 2008, 173: 205-219.
[11] Sun Y, Niu F L, Liu H F, et al. Crustal structure and deformation of the SE Tibetan plateau revealedby receiver function data[J].Earth Planet. Sci Lett, 2012, 349-350: 186-197.
[12] Hu J F, Xu X Q, Yang H Y, et al. S receiver function analysis of the crustal and lithospheric structures beneatheastern Tibet[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2011, 306: 77-85.
[13] Wang C Y, Zhu LP, Lou H. Crustal thicknesses and Poisson’s ratios in the eastern Tibetan Plateau and their tectonic implications[J]. J Geophy Res, 2010, 115: B11301.
[14] Ligorria J P, Ammon C J. Iterative deconvolution and receiver-function estimation[J]. Bull Seismo Soc Am, 1999, 89(1): 395-400.
[15] Zhu L P, Kanamori. Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismie receiver functions[J]. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105(B2): 2969-2980.
[16] 李永华, 吴庆举, 田小波, 等. 用接收函数方法研究云南及其邻区地壳上地幔结构[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009, 52(1): 67-80.
[17] Xu Lili, St′ephane Rondenay, Robert D. van der Hilst. Structure of the crust beneath the southeastern Tibetan Plateau from teleseismic receiver functions[J]. Phys Earth planet Int, 2007, 165: 176-193.
[18] 汪缉安, 徐青, 张文仁. 云南大地热流及地热地质问题[J]. 地震地质, 1990, 12(4): 367-377.
[19] Wang J A, Xu Q, Zhang W R. Heat flow data and some geologic—geotherm al problems in Yunnan Province[J]. Seismol Geol (in Chinese), 1990, 12(4): 367-377.
[20] Wang Y. Heat flow pattern and lateral variations of lithosphere strength in China mainland: constraints on active deformation[J]. Phys Earth planet Int, 2001, 126: 121-146.
[21] 周连庆, 赵翠萍, 修济刚, 陈章立. 川滇地区Lg波Q值层析成像[J]. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(6): 1745-1752.