重点地震监视区敏感台站的识别研究

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2020.02.006

地震 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 82-90.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2020.02.006

重点地震监视区敏感台站的识别研究

司政亚^1,2, 蒋长胜¹, 邱宇¹

1.中国地震局地球物理研究所, 北京 100081;
2.北京市地震局, 北京 100080

收稿日期:2019-02-28 出版日期:2020-04-30 发布日期:2020-04-24
通讯作者: 蒋长胜, 研究员。 E-mail: jiangcs@cea-igp.ac.cn
作者简介:司政亚(1994-), 女, 河南新郑人, 助理工程师, 主要从事地震监测分析技术研究。
基金资助:
科技部科技基础资源调查专项课题(2018FY100504)

Investigation on Identification of Sensitive Stations in Earthquake Monitoring Target Area

SI Zheng-Ya^1,2, JIANG Chang-Sheng¹, QIU Yu¹

1.Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China;
2.Beijing Earthquake Agency, Beijing 100080, China

Received:2019-02-28 Online:2020-04-30 Published:2020-04-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 识别显著影响重点监视区地震检测能力的“敏感台站”, 对有针对性地开展地震台网运行维护和加强相关区域天然地震与非天然地震的监视跟踪工作有重要意义。利用基于概率的最小完整性震级(PMC)方法, 通过对研究区地震台站进行“检测能力评分”(Dscore)和“缺失评分”(Missing Score)方式进行识别研究, 以龙门山断裂南段强震危险区为例的重点监视区“敏感台站”识别结果表明, 研究区内51个台站的“检测能力评分”及“缺失评分”, 可识别对重点监视区地震检测能力影响最大的台站, 给出台站停止运行引起的最小完整性震级的变化, 并探讨了多台站停止运行等造成影响的极限情况。上述“敏感台站”的识别方式, 可为地震台网运行维护、针对特定目标区的地震监视跟踪和进一步的台网优化改造提供参考。

关键词: 地震检测能力, 敏感台站, 重点监视区, PMC方法

Abstract: It is of great significance to identify the Sensitive Stations which affect the seismic detection capability in the key monitoring region. Identifying Sensitive Stations is also particularly important to carry out the maintenance of seismic network and strengthen the monitoring and tracking for natural and non-natural earthquakes in the related areas. In this paper, we apply the probability-based magnitude of completeness (PMC) method, by calculating the Detection Capability Score (Dscore) and Missing Score to identify the seismic stations. We take the potential seismic risk region in the south of Longmenshan Fault as an example to identify the Sensitive Stations in the key monitoring region. The results show that by calculating the Dscore and Missing Score of stations in the study area, we can identify the stations which have great impact on the key monitoring region, and get the variation of completeness magnitude caused by the operation stopping of the station. In addition, we also discuss the impact of the key monitoring region after several stations stop running. The method of identifying Sensitive Stations can provide some reference for the maintenance of seismic network, seismic monitoring and tracking in the target area and the optimization and reconstruction of the seismic network.

Key words: Detection capability of earthquake, Sensitive station, Key monitoring region, Probability-based magnitude of completeness (PMC) method

中图分类号:

P315.7

司政亚, 蒋长胜, 邱宇. 重点地震监视区敏感台站的识别研究[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 82-90.

SI Zheng-Ya, JIANG Chang-Sheng, QIU Yu. Investigation on Identification of Sensitive Stations in Earthquake Monitoring Target Area[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2020, 40(2): 82-90.

参考文献

[1] Schorlemmer D, Mele F, Marzocchi W. A completeness analysis of the national seismic network of Italy[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2010, 115(B4): B04308.
[2] Biegalski S R, Bowyer T W, Eslinger P W, et al. Analysis of data from sensitive U.S. monitoring stations for the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear reactor accident[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2012, 114(12): 15-21.
[3] Benis K Z, Fatehifar E, Shafiei S, et al. Design of a sensitive air quality monitoring network using an integrated optimization approach[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2016, 30(3): 779-793.
[4] Mofarrah A, Husain T. A holistic approach for optimal design of air quality monitoring network expansion in an urban area[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(3): 432-440.
[5] Elkamel A, Fatehifar E, Taheri M, et al. A heuristic optimization approach for Air Quality Monitoring Network design with the simultaneous consideration of multiple pollutants[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 88(3): 507-516.
[6] Schorlemmer D, Woessner J. Probability of detecting an earthquake[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2008, 98(5): 2103-2117.
[7] Nanjo K, Ishibe T, Tsuruoka H, et al. Analysis of the completeness magnitude and seismic network coverage of Japan[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2010, 100(6): 3261-3268.
[8] Nanjo K, Schorlemmer D, Woessner J, et al. Earthquake detection capability of the Swiss Seismic Network[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2010, 181(3): 1713-1724.
[9] Gentili S, Sugan M, Peruzza L. Probabilistic completeness assessment of the past 30 years of seismic monitoring in northeastern Italy[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2011, 186(1): 81-96.
[10] 蒋长胜, 房立华, 韩立波, 等. 利用PMC方法评估地震台阵的地震监测能力以西昌流动地震台阵为例[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(3): 832-843.
JIANG Chang-sheng, FANG Li-hua, HAN Li-bo, et al. Assessment of earthquake detection capability for the seismic array: A case study of the Xichang seismic array[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(3): 832-843 (in Chinese).
[11] Wu Z, Jiang C, Li X, et al. Time-dependent seismic hazard of the southern Longmenshan fault zone and the Sichuan-Yunnan region: earthquake predictability and its limit[M]∥Wu Z, Jiang C, Li X, et al. Earthquake Phenomenology from the field. Springer: Singapore, 2014: 99-110.
[12] 国家地震局震害防御司. 中国历史强震目录: 公元前23世纪—公元1911年[M]. 地震出版社, 1995.
Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, China Earthquake Administration. Catalogue of Chinese historical strong earthquakes (23rd Century B.C.—1911 A. D.)[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1995 (in Chinese).
[13] 中国地震局震害防御司. 中国近代地震目录: 公元1912年—1990年, M_S≥4.7[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1999.
Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, China Earthquake Administration. Catalogue of modern earthquakes in China (1912—1990, M_S≥4.7)[M]. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 1999 (in Chinese).
[14] 王亚文, 蒋长胜, 刘芳, 等. 中国地震台网监测能力评估和台站检测能力评分(2008—2015年)[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(7): 2767-2778.
WANG Ya-wen, JIANG Chang-sheng, LIU Fang, et al. Assessment of earthquake monitoring capability and score of seismic station detection capability in China Seismic Network (2008—2015)[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60(7): 2767-2778 (in Chinese).

[1]	贾漯昭, 宋美琴, 谢健健, 邢康, 高家乙. 华北块体地震活动显著增强预测效能评估[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 38-48.
[2]	万森林, 张军龙, 刘明军, 贺为民, 李海龙, 郭长宝, 李智敏. 岷山断块的发震构造与地震活动性分析[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 49-70.
[3]	李瑞莎, 张希, 贾鹏, 白卓立. 青藏块体东北缘跨断层异常场地比指标及其在地震预测中的应用[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 71-81.
[4]	艾萨·伊斯马伊力, 陈界宏, 毛志强. 利用帕金森矢量检测2019年长宁6.0级地震的地磁场变化[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 91-99.
[5]	王喜龙, 贾晓东, 钱蕊, 付聪. 2013年芦山M_S7.0地震前南北地震带数字化水位、水温高频信息异常特征及效能分析[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 100-116.
[6]	李艳永, 王成虎, 朱皓清, 乌尼尔. 北天山地区震源机制与构造应力场特征[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 117-129.
[7]	张双凤, 张小涛, 张丽晓. 基于b值的晋冀鲁豫交界区强震背景研究[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 130-139.
[8]	毕金孟, 蒋长胜, 马永. 2019年6月17日四川长宁M_S6.0地震早期序列参数分析及强余震概率预测[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 140-154.
[9]	向阳, 孙小龙, 杨朋涛, 张磊, 巩浩波. 2019年长宁M6.0和2018年兴文M5.7地震引起的井水位同震响应对比分析[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 155-165.
[10]	翟丽娜, 贾晓东, 焦明若, 孔祥瑞, 王松阳. 利用不规则形状载荷模型研究周边矿山开采对营口倾斜观测的影响[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 166-176.
[11]	杨小林, 危自根, 杨锦玲. 陕西乾陵台洞体应变周年变化的动力诊断[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 177-187.
[12]	薛艳, 姜祥华, 刘桂萍. 华北地区强震活动状态研究[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 1-17.
[13]	陈章立. 再论地震大小的度量[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(1): 1-10.
[14]	尹晓菲, 张国民, 邵志刚, 王芃, 孙鑫喆. 华北地区强震活动特点研究[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(1): 11-33.
[15]	李旭茂, 刘耀炜, 张磊, 施得旸, 李婧. 井水温观测分析中的水-热动力学研究综述[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(1): 34-51.

重点地震监视区敏感台站的识别研究

Investigation on Identification of Sensitive Stations in Earthquake Monitoring Target Area

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价