中强地震前地磁极化异常特征及其与后续地震的关系

doi:10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2021.02.013

地震 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 170-179.doi: 10.12196/j.issn.1000-3274.2021.02.013

中强地震前地磁极化异常特征及其与后续地震的关系

樊文杰¹, 冯丽丽², 李霞², 管贻亮³, 何畅⁴, 廖晓峰⁴, 贺曼秋⁵, 刘素珍⁶, 袁文秀⁷, 艾萨·伊斯马伊力⁸

1.云南省地震局, 云南昆明 650224;
2.青海省地震局, 青海西宁 810001;
3.山东省地震局, 山东济南 250014;
4.四川省地震局, 四川成都 610041;
5.重庆市地震局, 重庆 401147;
6.山西省地震局, 山西太原 030021;
7.浙江省地震局, 浙江杭州 310013;
8.新疆维吾尔自治区地震局, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

收稿日期:2021-01-03 修回日期:2021-02-18 发布日期:2021-08-06
作者简介:樊文杰(1990-), 男, 河南三门峡人, 工程师, 主要从事震磁关系和构造应力等研究。
基金资助:
地震科技星火计划项目(XH20062)

Characteristics of Geomagnetic Vertical Intensity Polarization Anomalies before Moderate Strong Earthquakes and Their Relationship with Subsequent Earthquakes

FAN Wen-jie¹, FENG Li-li², LI Xia², GUAN Yi-liang³, HE Chang⁴, LIAO Xiao-feng⁴, HE Man-qiu⁵, LIU Su-zhen⁶, YUAN Wen-xiu⁷, AISA Yisimayili⁸

1. Yunnan Earthquake Agency, Kunming 650224, China;
2. Qinghai Earthquake Agency, Xining 810001, China;
3. Shandong Earthquake Agency, Jinan 250014, China;
4. Sichuan Earthquake Agency, Chengdu 610041, China;
5. Chongqing Earthquake Agency, Chongqing 401147, China;
6. Shanxi Earthquake Agency, Taiyuan 310013, China;
7. Zhejiang Earthquake Agency, Hangzhou 830011, China;
8. Earthquake Agency of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 030021, China

Received:2021-01-03 Revised:2021-02-18 Published:2021-08-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于国家地磁台网中心的地磁秒采样数据, 采用地磁垂直强度极化法, 计算了2019年1月1日至2020年7月31日全国各地磁台站的极化值, 对2019年中国大陆西部(110°E以西)极化异常进行了分析, 研究了2020年于田M_S6.4等中强地震前地磁极化异常变化特征及其与后续地震的关系。研究发现: ①地磁极化异常具有空间成组特征, 即空间上多个地区可以同时出现地磁极化异常; 地磁极化异常一般被认为是震前震源区发生断层蠕动或岩石破裂导致的电磁辐射, 这意味着震前可能会有多个地区同时发生断层蠕动或岩石破裂, 这一现象似乎表明有一个“力源”在主导多区域同时发生断层蠕动或岩石破裂。 ②地磁极化异常的后续地震具有成组特征, 即一个地区出现极化异常后可能发生多次地震。该现象对日常会商分析具有重要参考意义, 即此类异常发生预期地震后可能还会有类似地震的发生。 ③以往的一些研究认为地磁极化异常一般在震前2—3个月出现, 但本研究发现极化异常出现后10个月在异常区域仍然会发生地震, 这表明电磁辐射异常可能不仅仅是短临异常, 还可能具有中期指示意义, 即断层蠕动或岩石破裂发生时间可能在震前近1年左右便已开始。这一发现对目前许多类似地震电磁异常研究仅仅分析异常后3个月左右内地震提出了挑战。

关键词: 地震异常, 电磁波, 极化, 断层蠕动, 岩石破裂

Abstract: Based on the 1-second sampling data from the national geomagnetic network center, using the method of geomagnetic vertical intensity polarization, we calculated the geomagnetic polarization values of stations in China from January 1, 2019 to July 31, 2020. The polarization anomalies in the western China (west of 110°E) in 2019 are analyzed, and the characteristics of geomagnetic polarization anomalies before moderate earthquakes such as Yutian M_S6.4 earthquake and its relationship with earthquakes are studied. The results show that, ① the geomagnetic polarization anomalies have the characteristics of spatial grouping, that is, the polarization anomalies can occur simultaneously in multiple regions. Geomagnetic polarization anomalies are generally considered to be electromagnetic radiation caused by fault creep or rock rupture in the source area before the earthquake. This means that fault creep or rock rupture may occur in multiple areas at the same time before the earthquake. It seems to indicate that there is a force source of that causes fault creep or rock rupture in multiple areas at the same time. ② Earthquakes have group characteristics after geomagnetic polarization anomalies, that is, multiple earthquakes may occur after polarization anomalies in one region. And this phenomenon is of great reference significance for routine consultation and analysis. The subsequent earthquakes may occur after the expected earthquake. ③ Some previous studies demonstrated that geomagnetic polarization anomalies generally appeared 2~3 months before the earthquakes, but we found that earthquakes would still occur in the abnormal area 10 months after the polarization anomalies. It indicates that the electromagnetic radiation anomalies may not only be short-term anomalies, but may also have mid-term indication, that is, fault creeping or rock rupture may have started nearly 1 year before the earthquakes. This discovery poses a challenge to many current studies of similar electromagnetic anomalies that only to be connected with earthquakes within 3 months.

Key words: Earthquake anomalies, Electromagnetic waves, Geomagnetic polarization, Fault creep, Rock fracture

中图分类号:

P315.7

樊文杰, 冯丽丽, 李霞, 管贻亮, 何畅, 廖晓峰, 贺曼秋, 刘素珍, 袁文秀, 艾萨·伊斯马伊力. 中强地震前地磁极化异常特征及其与后续地震的关系[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(2): 170-179.

FAN Wen-jie, FENG Li-li, LI Xia, GUAN Yi-liang, HE Chang, LIAO Xiao-feng, HE Man-qiu, LIU Su-zhen, YUAN Wen-xiu, AISA Yisimayili. Characteristics of Geomagnetic Vertical Intensity Polarization Anomalies before Moderate Strong Earthquakes and Their Relationship with Subsequent Earthquakes[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2021, 41(2): 170-179.

参考文献

[1] 丁鉴海, 卢振业, 黄雪香. 地震电磁学[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1994.
DING Jian-hai, LU Zhen-ye, HUANG Xue-xiang. Seismo-electromagnetism[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1994 (in Chinese).
[2] Molchanov O A, Hayakawa M, Rafalsky V A. Penetration characteristics of electromagnetic emissions from an underground seismic source into the atmosphere, ionosphere and magnetosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995, 100: 1691-1712.
[3] Hayakawa M, Kawate R, Molchanov O A, et al. Results of ultra-low-frequency magnetic field measurements during the Guam earthquake of 8 August 1993[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1996, 23(3): 241-244.
[4] Ismaguilov V S, Kopytenko Y A, Hattori K, et al. ULF magnetic emissions connected with under sea bottom earthquakes[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2001, 1(1-2): 23-31.
[5] Molchanov O A, Schekotov A, Fedorov E N. Preseismic ULF electromagnetic effect from observation at Kamchatka[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2003, 3(3-4): 203-209.
[6] Hattori K. ULF geomagnetic changes associated with large earthquakes[J]. Terrestrial Atmospheric Oceanic Sciences, 2004, 15(3): 329-360.
[7] Prattes G, Schwingenschuh K, Eichelberger H U, et al. Multi-point ground-based ULF magnetic field observations in Europe during seismic active periods in 2004 and 2005[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2008, 8(3): 501-507.
[8] 何畅, 冯志生. 极化方法在成都地磁台的应用研究[J]. 地震学报, 2017, 39(4): 558-564.
HE Chang, FENG Zhi-sheng. Application of polarization method to geomagnetic data from the station Chengdu[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2017, 39(4): 558-564 (in Chinese).
[9] 姚休义, 滕云田. 2010年元谋M_S5.2地震前地磁极化异常研究[J]. 地震研究, 2017, 40(3): 444-448.
YAO Xiu-yi, TENG Yun-tian. Variation of geomagnetic polarization value associated with the 2010 Yuanmou M_S5.2 earthquake[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 2017, 40(3): 444-448 (in Chinese).
[10] 艾萨·伊斯马伊力, 冯志生, 陈界宏, 等. 2020年于田M_S6.4地震前地磁极化异常特征分析[J]. 内陆地震, 2020, 34(3): 295-302.
AISA Yisimayili, FENG Zhi-sheng, CHEN Jie-hong, et al. Analysis on geomagnetic polarization anomalies before Yutian M_S6.4 earthquake in 2020[J]. Inland Earthquake, 2020, 34(3): 295-302 (in Chinese).
[11] 冯志生, 李琪, 卢军, 等. 基于磁通门秒值数据的地震ULF磁场可靠信息提取[J]. 华南地震, 2010, 30(2): 1-7.
FENG Zhi-sheng, LI Qi, LU Jun, et al. The seismic ULF geomagnetic reliable information exaction based on fluxgate magnetometer data of second value[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 2010, 30(2): 1-7 (in Chinese).
[12] Masci F. On the seismogenic increase of the ratio of the ULF geomagnetic field components[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2011, 187(1-2): 19-32.
[13] 李琪, 杨星, 蔡绍平. 极化方法应用于地磁台阵的震例分析[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2015, 10(2): 412 -417.
LI Qi, YANG Xing, CAI Shao-ping. Case study of applying polarization method to geomagnetic array data[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2015, 10(2): 412-417 (in Chinese).
[14] Huang Q H, Ikeya M. Seismic electromagnetic signals (SEMS) explained by a simulation experiment using electromagnetic waves[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1998, 109(3-4): 107-114.
[15] 廖晓峰, 冯丽丽, 祁玉萍, 等. 地磁极化方法在阿拉善5.0级地震中的应用研究[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(4): 127-135.
LIAO Xiao-feng, FENG Li-li, QI Yu-ping, et al. Application of geomagnetic polarization method in the Alashan M5.0 earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 2019, 39(4): 127-135 (in Chinese).

中强地震前地磁极化异常特征及其与后续地震的关系

Characteristics of Geomagnetic Vertical Intensity Polarization Anomalies before Moderate Strong Earthquakes and Their Relationship with Subsequent Earthquakes

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	廖晓峰, 冯丽丽, 祁玉萍, 李霞. 地磁极化方法在阿拉善5.0级地震中的应用研究[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(4): 127-135.
[2]	刘琦, 张晶, 马震. 结合钻孔水位、 GPS资料分析2016年门源M_S6.4地震前分量钻孔应变异常特征[J]. 地震, 2016, 36(3): 76-86.
[3]	徐维东, 张学民, 李忠, 赵庶凡, 王贺生. 不同方位甚低频电磁波衰减的初步研究^*[J]. 地震, 2016, 36(2): 60-67.
[4]	车用太, 李万明, 刘成龙, 何案华, 鱼金子. 金沙江水网地下水动态在彝良M_S5.7地震前的异常及其特征[J]. 地震, 2014, 34(1): 104-111.