2013年松原5级震群序列精定位、 震源机制解及发震构造特征

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 东北松辽盆地内2013年10月、 11月接连发生5次5级以上强震, 该震群对研究东北地区孕震环境具有重要意义。本文采用双差定位算法和CAP方法(Cut and Paste)对松原5级震群序列的发震构造特征进行了详细研究。双差定位结果显示, 松原5级震群序列震中分布长轴呈NW—SE向(长轴方位约317°), 长度约10 km, 宽度约5 km, 与长岭—大山子断裂方位近乎垂直, 震源深度主要集中在4~13 km。 19个M_S≥3.5地震的震源机制解结果显示, 松原5级地震震群主要以逆冲、逆冲兼走滑型地震为主, 震源机制节面解Ⅰ的优势方位为NW—SE向。综合分析小震精定位与中强地震震源机制解结果, 我们认为, 2013年松原5级震群序列的发震构造是一条与长岭—大山子断裂几乎垂直的隐伏断裂, 震群序列中较大地震的初始破裂深度比质心深度深。松辽5级震源区的背景应力场既受太平洋板块对北东亚板块推挤作用的影响, 又受松辽盆地内部断裂带的控制, 在东北地区地下俯冲带深部强震活动的影响下, 深震活动强化了地幔物质的扰动, 进一步促进浅层介质的应力积累, 松辽盆地内部断裂带交汇处相对薄弱, 当应力积累到一定程度, 便发生中强地震。

关键词: 地震重定位, 震源机制解, 松辽盆地, 2013年松原5级震群

Abstract: Double-difference location algorithm and the CAP method (Cut and Paste) were used for the precision mapping and inversion of the focal mechanism solution for the Songyuan earthquake swarm above M5 in 2013. The double-difference location results show that the epicenter distribution sequence of the Songyuan M5 earthquake swarm is NW—SE, with a length of about 10 km, width of about 5 km, and a major axis of about 317°. It is almost perpendicular to the Changling-Dashanzi fault, and the focal depth is mainly concentrated at 2~14 km. The results of the focal mechanism solution of 19 M_S≥3.5 earthquakes indicate that the Songyuan M5 earthquake swarm is dominated by thrust, thrust and strike-slip earthquakes, and the dominant orientation of the focal plane solution I is NW—SE orientation. The depth of 19 earthquakes are focused on 4~6 km. The orientation of the epicentral distribution after the fine orientation is consistent with the dominant orientation of the focal mechanism solution plane I. The seismogenic structure of the Songyuan M5 swarm is an invisible fault that is almost perpendicular to the Changling—Dashanzi fault. The background stress field in the source area is affected not only by the push of the Pacific plate to the North East Asia plate, but also by the internal secondary fault zone of the Songliao basin, under the influence of deep seismic activity in the underground subduction zone of the Northeast China. The deep seismic activity has strengthened the disturbance of mantle material and further promoted the accumulation of stress in shallow medium. The junction of the secondary fault zone in Songliao basin is relatively weak, and when the stress accumulates to a certain extent, a moderate-strong earthquake will occur.

Key words: Earthquake relocation, Focal mechanism solution, Songliao basin, The Songyuan earthquake swarm in 2013

中图分类号:

P315.7

李君, 王勤彩. 2013年松原5级震群序列精定位、震源机制解及发震构造特征[J]. 地震, 2018, 38(4): 62-73.

LI Jun, WANG Qin-Cai. Relocation and Focal Mechanism of the Songyuan Earthquake Swarm Sequence in 2013[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2018, 38(4): 62-73.

参考文献

[1] 盛书中, 万永革, 王晓山, 等. 2013年吉林松原震源重定位及其发震构造[J]. 地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京); 北京大学), 2017, 24(2): 212-219.
[2] 吴戈, 房贺岩, 李志田, 等. 东北地震史料辑览. 北京: 地震出版社, 1992.
[3] 傅维洲, 贺日政. 松辽盆地及周边地带地震构造特征[J]. 世界地质, 1999, 18(2): 95-100.
[4] 李恩泽, 刘财, 张怀良, 等. 松辽盆地地震构造与地震活动相关性研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(4): 1337-1349.
[5] Waldhauser F, Ellsworth W L. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2000, 90(6): 1353-1368.
[6] Waldhauser F, Ellsworth W L. Fault structure and mechanics of the Hayward fault, California, from double-difference earthquake locations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2002, 107(B3).
[7] Hauksson E, Yang W, Shearer P M. Waveform relocated earthquake catalog California(1981 to June 2011)[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 2012, 102(5): 2239-2244.
[8] 王未来, 吴建平, 房立华, 等. 2014年云南鲁甸M_S6.5地震序列的双差定位[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(9): 3042-3051.
[9] 易桂喜, 龙锋, 闻学泽, 等. 2014年11月22日康定M_S6.3级地震序列发震构造分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(4): 1205-1209.
[10] 王勤彩, 陈章立, 郑斯华. 汶川大地震余震序列震源机制的空间分段特征[J]. 中国科学, 2009, 54(16): 2348-2354.
[11] 王勤彩, 王中平, 张金川, 等. 2010年4月玉树M_S7.3地震序列的断层结构[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(6): 1931-1940.
[12] Royden L A. and Keen C E. Rifting process and thermal evolution of continental margin of eastern Canada determined from subsidence curves[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 1980, 51: 341-363.
[13] 胡望水, 吕炳全, 张文军, 等. 松辽盆地构造演化及成盆动力学探讨[J]. 地质科学, 2005, 40(1): 16-31.
[14] 高立新. 中国松辽盆地构造环境及东北地区地震活动特征分析[J]. 地震, 2008, 28(4): 60-67.
[15] Zhen G, John Chen Y, Ning J Y, et al. High resolution 3-D crustal structure beneath NE China from joint inversion of ambient noise and receiver functions using NECESSArray data[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2015, 416: 1-11.
[16] 吴微微, 杨建思, 苏金蓉, 等. 2013年吉林前郭-乾安震源区中强地震矩张量反演与区域孕震环境研究[J]. 2014, 57(8): 2541-2554.
[17] 郑秀芬, 欧阳飚, 张东宁, 等. “国家数字测震台网数据备份中心”技术系统建设及其对汶川大地震研究的数据支撑[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009, 52(05): 1412-1417.
[18] Zhao L S, Helmberger D V. Source estimation from broadband regional seismograms[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1994, 84(1): 91-104.
[19] Zhu L P, Helmberger D V. Advancement in source estimation techniques using broadband regional seismograms[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1996, 86(5): 1634-1641.
[20] Zhu L P,Rivera L A. A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media[J]. Geophysical Journal International,2002, 148(3): 619-627.
[21] Dziewonski A M, Chou T A, Woodhouse J H. Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity[J]. J. Geophys. Res., 1981, 86: 2825-2852.
[22] Ekström G, Nettles M, Dziewonski A M. The global CMT project 2004-2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13, 017 earthquakes[J]. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2012, 200-201, 1-9.
[23] Zoback M L. First - and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The world stress map project[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1992, 97(B8): 11703-11728.
[24] 刘双庆, 薛艳, 蔡宏雷, 等. 利用重测定的震源深度特征探讨2013年吉林前郭5.8级震群发震因素[J]. 地震研究, 2015, 38(02): 211-220+333.
[25] Ellsworth W L, Zhonghuai X. Determination of the stress tensor from focal mechanism data[J]. Eos Trans AGU, 1980, 61(1): 117.
[26] Michael A J. Determination of stress from slip data: faults and folds[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1984, 89(B13): 11517-11526.
[27] Gephart J W. FMSI: A FORTRAN program for inverting fault/slickenside and earthquake focal mechanism data to obtain the regional stress tensor[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 1990, 16(7): 953-989.
[28] 许忠淮, 汪素云, 黄雨蕊, 等. 由多个小震推断的青甘和川滇地区地壳应力场的方向特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 1987, 30(5): 476-486.
[29] 万永革, 沈正康, 刁桂苓, 等. 利用小震分布和区域应力场确定大震断层面参数方法及其在唐山地震序列中的应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(3): 793-804.
[30] 万永革, 盛书中, 许雅儒, 等. 不同应力状态和摩擦系数对综合P波辐射花样影响的模拟研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(4): 994-1001.
[31] 万永革, 吴逸民, 盛书中, 等. P波极性数据所揭示的台湾地区三维应力结构的初步结果[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(11): 2809-2818.
[32] Wallace R E. Geometry of shearing stress and relation to faulting[J]. The journal of Geology, 1951, 118-130.
[33] Bott M. The Mechanics of Obh'que Slip Faulting.GEOL[J]. MAG,1959, 96(2): 11-12.
[34] 许忠淮, 戈澍谟. 1984 用滑动方向拟合法反演富蕴地震断裂带应力场[J]. 地震学报, 6(4): 395-404.
[35] Martínez-Garzón P, Kwiatek G, Sone H, et al. Spatiotemporal changes, faulting regimes, and source parameters of induced seismicity: A case study from The Geysers geothermal field[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 2014, 119: 8378-8396.
[36] Hardebeck J L, Michael AJ. Damped regional-scale stress inversions Methodology and examples for southern California and the Coalinga aftershock sequence[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2006, 111(B11): 1-11.
[37] 许忠淮, 汪素云, 黄雨蕊, 等. 1989. 由大量的地震资料推断的我国大陆构造应力场[J]. 地球物理学报, 2006, 32(6): 636-647.
[38] 谢富仁, 张红艳, 崔效锋, 等. 中国大陆现代构造应力场与强震活动[J]. 国际地震动态, 2011, (1): 4-12.
[39] 徐纪人, 赵志新, 石川有三. 中国大陆地壳应力场与构造运动区域特征研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(3): 770-781.
[40] 孙文斌, 和跃时. 中国东北地区地震活动特征及其与日本海板块俯冲的关系[J]. 地震地质, 2004, 26(1): 122-132.
[41] 张凤鸣, 张亚江, 许晓艳, 等. 日本海西部-中国东北深震区俯冲运动对东北地区浅源地震的动力作用[J]. 东北地震研究, 2007, (1): 33-39.
[42] 李圣强, 陈棋福, 赵里, 等. 2011年5月中国东北M_W5.7深震的非同寻常震源机制: 区域波形反演与成因探讨[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(9): 2959-2970.