基于分区解缠方式研究2010年玉树MW6.9地震同震形变

地震 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 22-30.

基于分区解缠方式研究2010年玉树M_W6.9地震同震形变

李奇¹, 孟国杰¹, 张奎², 苏小宁¹, 戴娅琼¹, 汪慧²

1.中国地震局地震预测重点实验室, 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 北京 100036;
2.重庆大学通信工程学院, 重庆 400044

收稿日期:2015-02-12 出版日期:2015-07-31 发布日期:2020-06-28
作者简介:李奇(1989-), 男, 四川安岳人, 在读硕士研究生, 主要从事InSAR数据处理及地壳形变研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金课题(41174004, 61071191, 4146116400, 441491240265), 国家国际科技合作专项项目(2010DFB20190, 2015DFR21100), 中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务费专项(2012IES010301), 中央高校基本业务费项目(106112013cdjzr160005)

Coseismic Deformation of the 2010 Yushu M_W6.9 Earthquake Derived from Subregion Phase Unwrapping

LI Qi¹, MENG Guo-jie¹, ZHANG Kui², SU Xiao-ning¹, WANG Hui²

1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Prediction, Institute of Earthquake Science, CEA, Beijing 100036, China;
2. School of Communication Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China

Received:2015-02-12 Online:2015-07-31 Published:2020-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2010年玉树M_W6.9地震发生后, 已有学者利用DInSAR技术得到了该次地震的同震形变场, 并在此基础上反演了其震源破裂滑动分布。本文以提高玉树地震同震形变场准确度作为出发点, 设计了一种新的解缠方式获取相应的同震形变场: 首先沿地表同震破裂迹线将InSAR干涉图像分割成上下两部分, 然后利用网络流解缠算法对其分别进行相位解缠, 最后通过统计重叠部分的相位一致性信息将两部分结果进行拼接。利用震中区GPS同震位移数据对分区解缠结果进行验证。结果表明: 相对于整体解缠结果, 分区解缠方式得到的最大视线向沉降值由42.6 cm增加到48.1 cm, 所得结果与GPS观测结果更加接近, 采用分区解缠方式提高了断层附近形变场的准确性。

关键词: 同震形变, 玉树地震, DInSAR, 相位解缠, GPS

Abstract: Coseismic deformation field of the 2010 Yushu M_W6.9 earthquake has been derived from DInSAR technique and rupture slip distribution has been obtained using inversion approaches in a number of previous studies. In this paper, we have designed a novel unwrapping approach, in an effort to derive a higher precision for coseismic deformation of the Yushu earthquake. The InSAR interferogram was divided into upper and lower subregions along the surface rupture trace. Unwrapping is performed for the 2 subregions respectively using network flow algorithm. Subsequently, the unwrapped interfrograms are stitched together to obtain the overall coseismic deformation, analyzing the statistical consistence of overlapping zone. We use three-dimensional coseismic displacements from GPS to validate the InSAR-derived deformation field of the novel approach. The result shows that, with respect to unwrapping for entire interferogram, subregion unwrapping approach can improve the accuracy of coseismic deformation accuracy. The maximum sinking value increases to 48.1 cm for subregion phase unwrapping from 42.6 cm for the approach of entire region phase unwrapping, with the former closer to the GPS-derived coseismic displacement.

Key words: Coseismic deformation, DInSAR, GPS, Phase unwrapping, Yushu earthquake

中图分类号:

P315.7

李奇, 孟国杰, 张奎, 苏小宁, 戴娅琼, 汪慧. 基于分区解缠方式研究2010年玉树M_W6.9地震同震形变[J]. 地震, 2015, 35(3): 22-30.

LI Qi, MENG Guo-jie, ZHANG Kui, SU Xiao-ning, WANG Hui. Coseismic Deformation of the 2010 Yushu M_W6.9 Earthquake Derived from Subregion Phase Unwrapping[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2015, 35(3): 22-30.

参考文献

[1] 张勇, 许力生, 陈运泰. 2010年青海玉树地震震源过程[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2010, (7): 819-821.
[2] 陈立春, 王虎, 冉勇康, 等. 玉树M_S7.1级地震地表破裂与历史大地震[J]. 科学通报, 2010, (13): 1200-1205.
[3] Guo H, Wang C, et al. Radar for Earth Observation: Theory and Application [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.
[4] Rogers A E, Ingalls R P. Venus: Mapping the Surface Reflectivity by Radar Interferometry[J]. Science, 1969, 165: 797-799.
[5] Fernández J, Romero R, Carrasco D, et al. InSAR volcano and seismic monitoring in Spain. Results for the period 1992—2000 and possible interpretations [J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2002, 37: 285-297.
[6] Yan J, Wang J, Zhang J, et al. The co-seismic deformation reserch using D-InSAR observation [J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2004, 29: 64-69.
[7] 王华. 利用InSAR研究西藏拉孜地震同震形变[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2014, (5): 1-3. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5867.2014.05.001.
[8] Atzori S, Tolomei C, Antonioli A, et al. The 2010—2011 Canterbury, New Zealand, seismic sequence: Multiple source analysis from InSAR data and modeling[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2012, 117(B8): 34-47.
[9] Goldstein R M, Zebker H A, Werner C L. Satellite radar interferometry two-dimensional phase unwrapping[J]. Radio Science, 1988, 23(4): 713-720.
[10] Xu W, Cumming I. A region-growing algorithm for InSAR phase unwrapping[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1999, 37(1): 124-134.
[11] Ghiglia D C, Romero L A. Robust two-dimensional weighted and unweighted phase unwrapping that uses fast transforms and iterative methods [J]. J Opt Soc A A, 1994, (1): 107-117.
[12] Costantini M. A novel phase unwrapping method based on network programming[J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions, 1998, 36(3): 813-821.
[13] Chen C W, Zebker H A. Network approaches to two-dimensional phase unwrapping: intractability and two new algorithms[J]. J Opt Soc Am, 2000, 17(3): 401-414.
[14] Li Z, Elliott J R, Feng W, et al. The 2010 M_W6.8 Yushu (Qinghai, China) earthquake: Constraints provided by InSAR and body wave seismology[J]. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116(B10). doi:10.1029/2011JB008358.
[15] Qu C Y, Zhang G H, Shan X J, et al. Coseismic deformation derived from analyses of C and L band SAR data and fault slip inversion of the Yushu M_S7.1 earthquake, China in 2010[J]. Tectonophysics, 2013, 584: 119-128.
[16] Zha X J, Dai Z Y, Ge L L, et al. Fault geometry and slip distribution of the 2010 Yushu earthquakes inferred from InSAR measurement[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2011, 101(4): 1951-1958.
[17] Rosen P A, Hensley S, Peltzer G, et al. Updated Repeat Orbit Interferometry Package Released[J]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 2004, 85(5): 43.
[18] Li C Y, Pang J Z, Zhang Z Q, Characteristics, Geometry, and Segmentation of the Surface Rupture Associated with the 14 April 2010 Yushu Earthquake, Eastern Tibet, China[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2012, 102(4): 1618-1638.
[19] Zhang K, Li Z, Meng G, et al. A very fast phase inversion approach for small baseline style interferogram stacks[J]. ISPRS Jo. urnal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014, 97: 1-8.
[20] Meng G J, Ren J W, Su X N, et al. Coseismic Deformation of the 2010 M_W6.9 Yushu Earthquake Derived from GPS Data [J]. Seismological Research Letters, 2013, 84(1): 57-64.