地震 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 27-39.
徐洪伟, 王伟君
收稿日期:
2013-12-23
修回日期:
2014-03-28
出版日期:
2014-07-31
发布日期:
2020-09-08
作者简介:
徐洪伟(1987-),吉林省长春人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事地震动模拟等研究。
基金资助:
XU Hong-wei, WANG Wei-jun
Received:
2013-12-23
Revised:
2014-03-28
Online:
2014-07-31
Published:
2020-09-08
摘要: 低速断层破碎带内传播的断层围陷波是断层内部信息的重要载体,研究其波场特征是反,演断层内部结构的关键。前人对围陷波的模拟主要针对垂直断层,但实际断层大部分是倾斜的。本文利用谱元法数值模拟地震波在垂直和倾斜断层区域的传播,并分别单独改变断层破碎带或断层两盘速度差异等参数,对比分析地震动在时域和频域发生的变化,研究这些参数对波场特征的影响。对比研究表明,当存在一定宽度的低速破碎带时,倾斜断层对近断层区域波场的影响和垂直断层相比在幅值分布上有比较显著的差异,尤其是当断层两盘同时还存在速度差异时;在倾斜和垂直断层破碎带上方,均能产生断层围陷波,其幅值特征差异不大,但在跨断层平面上的质点极化方式可能会存在差异:垂直断层围陷波质点极化方向表现为单一,而倾斜断层可能会出现多个方向。这些模拟结果有助于反演真实断层破碎带结构,也能够加深对近断层的强地面运动特征的认识。
中图分类号:
徐洪伟, 王伟君. 垂直和倾斜断层围陷波的谱元法数值模拟及其波场特征对比[J]. 地震, 2014, 34(3): 27-39.
XU Hong-wei, WANG Wei-jun. Simulation and Wave Field Comparison of V ertical and Inclined Fault Trapped Waves by Spectral Element Method[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2014, 34(3): 27-39.
[1] Li Y G, Leary P C.Fault Zone Trapped Seismic Waves[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1990, 80(5): 1245-1271. [2] Chester F M, EvansJ P, Biegel R L. Internal Structure and W ea kening Mechanisms of the San An-dreas Fault[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1993, 98(B1): 771-786. [3] Li Y G, Aki K, Adams D, et al.Seismic guided waves trapped in the fault zone of the Landers, Cal-ifornia, earthquake of 1992[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994, 99(B6): 11705-11722. [4] Spudich P, OlsenK B. Fault zone amplified waves as a possible seismic hazard along the Calaveras fault in central California[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2001,28(13): 2533-2536. [5] 张冬丽,徐锡伟,张献兵,等.断层破裂面倾角变化对断陷盆地强地面运动的影响[J].地球物理学报,2013,56(7): 2322-2331. [6] Li H Y, Zhu L P, Yang H F. Highr resolution structures of the Landers fault zone inferred from af-tershock waveform data[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2007, 1-13. [7] Ben-zion Y. Properties of seismic fault zone waves and their utility for imaging low velocity struc tures[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1998, 103(B6): 12567-12585. [8] Leary PC, Li Y G, Aki K.Observation and modeling of fault zone fracture seismic anisotropy, I, P,SV, SH travel times. Geophys[J]. J. R. Astron. Soc.,1987, 91: 461-484. [9] Li Y G, VidaleJ E, Aki K, et al. Depth dependent structure of the Landers fault zone from trapped waves generated by aftershocks[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2000, 105(B3): 6237-6254. [10] Peng Z G, Ben-zion Y. Quantitative analysis of seismic fault zone waves in the rupture zone of the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake: evidence for a shallow trapping structure[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2003, 155: 1021-1041. [11] Mizuno T, Nishigami K, Ito H, et al.Deep structure of the Mozumit Sukenobu fault, central Japan, estimated from the subsurface array observation of fault zone trapped waves[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2004,159: 622-642. [12] Wu J D, Hole J A, Snoke J A. Fault zone structure at depth from diferential dispersion of seismic guided waves: evidence for a deep waveguide on the San Andreas Faul[J]. Geophysical Journal In-ternational, 2010,182: 343-354. [13] Mizuno T, Nishigami K, Ito H, et al.Deep structure of the Mozuni -Sukenobu fault, central Japan, estimated from the subsurface array observation of fault zone trapped waves[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2004,159: 622-642. [14] Benrzion Y, Peng Z G, Okada D, et al.A shallow fault zone structure iluminated by trapped waves in the KaradereDuzce branch of the North Anatolian Fault, western Turkey[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2003,152: 699717. [15] LiY G, Ellsworth W L, Thurber C H, et al. Fault Zone Guided Wave from Explosions in the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield and Cienega Valley, California[J] Bullein of the Seismological Society of America, 1997, 87(1): 210-221. [16] Lewis M A, Ben-zion Y. Diversity of fault zone damage and trapping structures in the Parkfield se-tion of the San Andreas Fault from compre bhensive analysis of near fault seismograms[J]. Geophysi-cal Journal International, 2010, 183: 1579-1595. [17] Lewis M A, Ben-zion Y, MeGuire J J. Imaging the deep structure of the San Andreas Fault south of Hollister with joint analysis of fault zone head and direct P arrivals[J]. Geophysical Journal Interna-tional, 2007, 169: 1028-1042. [18] Yang H F, Zhu L P. Shallow low velocity zone of the San Jacinto fault from local earthquake wave form modellingDJ]. Geophysical Journal International, 2010,183: 421-432. [19] Li Y G, Vernon F L. Characterization of the San Jacinto fault zone near Anza, California, by fault zone trapped waves[J]. Journal Geophysics Researchr-Solid Earth, 2001, 106(30): 671-688. [20] 刘明军, 李松林,张先康,等海原断裂带断层通道波观测与破碎带宽度[J]物探与化探,2004,28(6): 549-552. [21] 楼海,王春镭,丁志峰,等.昆仑山断层園陷波的分析和研究[J].地球物理学报,2006, 49(3):788-796. [22] 张松林, 张先康,樊计昌.利用断层園陷波研究昆仑山口西8.1级地震破裂面[J].地震学报,2005, 27(1): 42-50. [23] Ben Zion Y.The response of two joined quarter spaces to SH line sources located at the material dis-continuity interface[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1989, 98: 213-222. [24] Ben-Zion Y, Aki K.Seismic radiation from an SH line source in a laterally heterogeneous planar fault zone[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1990, 80: 971-994. [25] Igel H, Ben-zion Y, Leary P C. Simulation of SH-and PS V-wave propagation in fault zones[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1997, 128: 533-546. [26] Jahnke G, lgel H, Ben-zion Y. Three dimensional calculations of fault -zone guided waves in various irregular structures[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2002, 151: 416-426. [27] Igel H, Jahnke G, Benrzion Y. Numerical Simulation of Fault Zone Guided Waves: Accuracy and 3-D ffects[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2002,159: 2067-2083. [28] Fohrmann M, Igel H, Jahnke G, BerZion Y. Guidedwaves from sources outside faults: an indica-tion for shallow fault zone structure?[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2004,161: 2125-2137. [29] Wu J D, Hole J A, Snoke J A, et al. Depth extent of the fault zone seismic waveguide: efects of in-creasing velocity with depth[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2008,173: 611-622. [30] Dimitri K, Tromp J. Introduction to the spectral element method for threedimensional seismic wave propogation[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1999, 139: 806-822. [31] Komatitsch D, Tromp J. A perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition for the second-or-der seismic wave equation[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2003,154: 146-153. [32] Tromp J, Komatitsch D, Liu Q.Spectral-element and adjoint methods in seismology[J]. Communi-cations in Computational Physics, 2008, 3(1): 1-32. [33] Wessel, Smith P W H F, New version of the Generic Mapping Tools released[G]. EOS Trans. New version of the Generic Mapping Tools released[G]. EOS Trans. AGU,1995, 76, 329. |
[1] | 曾宪伟, 龙锋, 任家琪, 蔡新华, 李文君. 2019年6月17日长宁MS6.0地震前后b值时空变化分析[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 1-14. |
[2] | 孙凯, 孟国杰, 洪顺英, 黄星, 董彦芳. 基于Sentinel-1A数据的四川长宁MS6.0地震同震形变场分析及断层滑动分布反演[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 15-27. |
[3] | 赵策, 左可桢, 赵翠萍. 2019年6月17日四川长宁6.0级地震序列活动特征[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 28-40. |
[4] | 王玮铭, 谭大诚. 2019年长宁MS6.0地震邻区分钟采样地电场分析[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 41-51. |
[5] | 肖卓, 高原. 伴随成像及其在地球深部结构研究中的应用[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 52-64. |
[6] | 蒋雨函, 高小其, 王阳洋, 张磊. 中国新疆北天山和台湾南部陆地泥火山研究进展[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 65-82. |
[7] | 马禾青, 杨明芝, 罗国富. 地震活动频次场研究[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 99-111. |
[8] | 戴盈磊, 万永革, 梁永朵, 张文静, 惠杨. 基于震源机制解资料的辽宁地区现今构造应力场[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 112-130. |
[9] | 黄颂, 姚丽, 姜楚峰. 基于幅相法的地磁低点位移异常可靠性分析方法[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 131-141. |
[10] | 王晨晖, 刘立申, 任佳, 袁颖, 王利兵, 陈凯男. 主成分分析法和遗传算法优化的支持向量机模型在地震伤亡人数预测中的应用[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 142-152. |
[11] | 王洪体, 崔仁胜, 王宏远, 叶鹏, 李丽娟. 对齐误差对测试地震计自噪声的影响[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 153-166. |
[12] | 罗毅, 田云锋, 张苏, 张景发. 利用InSAR技术研究青藏高原冻土形变特征[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(3): 179-188. |
[13] | 薛艳, 姜祥华, 刘桂萍. 华北地区强震活动状态研究[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 1-17. |
[14] | 贾漯昭, 宋美琴, 谢健健, 邢康, 高家乙. 华北块体地震活动显著增强预测效能评估[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 38-48. |
[15] | 万森林, 张军龙, 刘明军, 贺为民, 李海龙, 郭长宝, 李智敏. 岷山断块的发震构造与地震活动性分析[J]. 地震, 2020, 40(2): 49-70. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||