2011年日本9.0级地震的同震位错以及震后应力松弛过程对中国大陆的影响

地震 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 238-247.

2011年日本9.0级地震的同震位错以及震后应力松弛过程对中国大陆的影响

王丽凤^1,2, 刘杰¹, 赵金贵³, 赵静¹

1.中国地震台网中心, 北京 100045;
2.德国波茨坦大学数学系, 波茨坦 D-14476;
3.太原理工大学地球科学系, 山西太原 030024

收稿日期:2013-02-27 修回日期:2013-05-07 发布日期:2020-09-27
作者简介:王丽凤(1976-), 女, 山西原平人, 博士, 副研究员, 主要从事地震位错反演、岩石圈粘弹松弛、基于损伤流变力学的数值模拟及地震活动周期中的应力耦合等研究。
基金资助:
PROGRESS项目、国家自然科学基金项目(41204065)和“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAK19B02)共同资助

Coseismic Slip and Post-seismic Relaxation of the 2011 M9.0 Tohoku-oki Earthquake and its Influence on China Mainland

WANG Li-feng^1,2, LIU Jie¹, ZHAO Jingui³, ZHAO Jing¹

1. China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing 100045, China;
2. Mathematic Department, University of Potsdam. Potsdam D-14476, Germany;
3. Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China

Received:2013-02-27 Revised:2013-05-07 Published:2020-09-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于日本GEONET的GPS观测资料, 对日本2011年9.0级地震的同震和震后形变过程进行了研究。结果表明, 日本9.0级地震使中国大陆出现了显著的同震位移, 几乎对整个中国大陆都有影响。位移量在中国东北地区最大, 接近甚至超过该地区的年运动速率。震后1年观测到的形变基本上可由沿着断层面的蠕滑进行模拟, 粘弹松弛的贡献不大。根据所得到的震后蠕滑模型, 震后1年形变所释放的能量等同于发生一个8.7级地震, 其影响主要在东部地区, 最大位移约为年运动速率的30%。预测在未来2年, 该地震的影响范围将逐渐减小。地震造成的粘弹松弛在未来50~100年的尺度上, 对东北地区有拉张效应。日本9.0级地震整体上起到了卸载中国大陆在板块间挤压过程中所累积应变能的作用, 因此该地震发生后的几个月, 中国大陆东部的地震活动水平较震前明显降低。

关键词: GPS观测, 主震位错, 震后形变, 粘弹松弛, 震后蠕滑, 日本9.0级地震

Abstract: Based on GPS measurements of GEONET in Japan, we investigated the coseismic slip and postseismic relaxation of the 2011 M9.0 Tohoku-oki earthquake, and analyzed its influence on China mainland. The results indicate that the Tohoku-oki earthquake produced significant coseismic displacement in China mainland, especially in Northeast China, where the displacements are comparable or even higher than the annual tectonic motion. The observed displacements of 1 year following the Tohoku-oki earthquake can be generally modeled by creep on the fault plane. The post-seismic relaxation in 1 year following this big event releases the strain energy equivalent to an earthquake of M8.7, and mainly imposes influence in eastern China. Its produced displacements reach 30% of the annual tectonic motion. Furthermore, we predict that the influence of the Tohoku-oki earthquake in China will shrink quickly in the next 2 years. The viscoelastic relaxation in the deep depth has a significant influence in a long-term and at a large spatial scale, and has an extension effect in the northeast part of China for 50~100 years. The Tohoku-oki earthquake broke the locked segment of hundreds of kilometers between Eurasian and Pacific plate, and unloaded the stress in China mainland that accumulated by tectonic loading. Therefore, seismic activity in China after the Tohoku-oki earthquake is lower comparing to the seismic level before the earthquake.

Key words: M9.0 Japan earthquake, GPS measurements, Coseismic slip, Postseismic deformation, Viscoelastic relaxation, Postseismic creep

中图分类号:

P315.7

王丽凤, 刘杰, 赵金贵, 赵静. 2011年日本9.0级地震的同震位错以及震后应力松弛过程对中国大陆的影响[J]. 地震, 2013, 33(4): 238-247.

WANG Li-feng, LIU Jie, ZHAO Jingui, ZHAO Jing. Coseismic Slip and Post-seismic Relaxation of the 2011 M9.0 Tohoku-oki Earthquake and its Influence on China Mainland[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2013, 33(4): 238-247.

参考文献

[1] Pollitz F F, Burgmann R, Banerjee P. Geodetic slip model of the 2011 M9.0 Tohoku earthquake[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2011, 38, doi:10.1029/2011GL048632.
[2] Ozawa S. Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2011 magnitude-9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake[J]. Nature, 2011, doi:10.1038/nature10227.
[3] Fujiwara T. The 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake: Displacement reaching the Trench axis[J]. Science, 2011, 334, doi:10.1126/science.1211554.
[4] 王凡, 沈正康, 王阎昭, 等. 2011年3月11日日本宫城M_W9.0地震对其周边地区火山活动的影响[J]. 科学通报, 2011, 56: 1080-1083.
[5] 王敏. 全球定位系统测定2011年日本9级大震的远场同震位移[J]. 科学通报, 2011, 56: 1593-1596.
[6] 杨少敏, 聂兆生, 贾志革, 等. GPS解算的日本M_W9.0地震的远场同震地表位移[J]. 武汉大学学报, 2011, 36: 1337-1339.
[7] Pritchard M E, Simons M. An aseismic slip pulse in northern Chile and along-strike variations in seismogenic behavior[J]. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111: 1-14, doi:10.1029/2006JB004258.
[8] Dieterich J H. Modeling of rock friction: 2. Simulation of preseismic slip[J]. J Geophys Res, 1979, 84: 2161-2168.
[9] Tse S T, Rice J R. Crustal earthquake instability in relation to the depth variation of frictional slip properties[J]. J Geophys Res, 1986, 91: 9452-9472.
[10] Rundle J B, Jackson D D. A three-dimensional viscoelastic model of a strike-slip fault[J]. Geophys J R astr Soc, 1977, 49: 575-591.
[11] Pollitz F F, Sacks I S. Modeling of postseismic relaxation following the great 1857 earthquake, southern California[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1992, 82: 454-480.
[12] Wang L, Hainzl S, zeren M S, et al. Postseismic deformation induced by brittle rock damage of aftershocks[J]. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115, doi:10.1029/2010JB007532.
[13] Peltzer G, Rosen P, Rogez F, et al. Postseismic rebound in fault step-overs caused by pore fluid flow[J]. Science, 1996, 273: 1202-1204.
[14] Yamagiwa A, Hatanaka Y, Yutsudo T, et al. Real-time capability of GEONET system and its application to crust monitoring[J]. Bull Geogr Surv Inst, 2006: 27-33.
[15] Wang L, Hainzl S, Zoeller G, et al. Stress- and aftershock-constrained joint inversions for co-and post-seismic slip applied to the 2004 M6.0 Parkfield earthquake[J]. J Geophys Res, 2012, doi:10.1029/2011JB009017.
[16] 郝金来, 王为民, 姚振兴. 2011年3月11日日本东北沿海M_W9.0级地震震源破裂过程[J]. 中国科学, 2011, 41: 745-749.
[17] Shen Z K. Postseismic deformation following the Landers earthquake, California, 28 June 1992[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1994, 84: 780-791.
[18] Wang L. Afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation following the 1999 M7.4 Izmit earthquake, from GPS measurements[J]. Geophys J Int, 2009, 178: 1220-1237, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04228.x.
[19] Bürgmann R. Time-dependent distributed afterslip on and deep below the Izmit earthquake rupture[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 2002, 92: 126-137.
[20] Hearn E H, Bürgmann R, Reilinger R E. Dynamics of Izmit earthquake postseismic deformation and loading of the Düzce earthquake hypocenter[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 2002, 92: 172-193.
[21] Hsu Y J, Yu S B, Chen H Y. Coseismic and postseismic deformation associated with the 2003 Chengkung, Taiwan, earthquake[J]. Geophys J Int, 2009, 176: 420-430, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.04009.x.
[22] Lorenzo Martín F, Roth F, Wang R. Elastic and inelastic triggering of earthquakes in the North Anatolian Fault zone[J]. Tectonophys, 2006, 424: 271-289, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.046.
[23] Zhao D, Hasegawa A, Horiuchi S. Tomographic Imaging of P and S Wave Velocity Structure Beneath Northeastern Japan[J]. J Geophys Res, 1991, 97: 19--909-19928.
[24] Suito H, Iizuka M, Hirahara K. 3-D viscoelastic FEM modeling of crustal deformation in Northeast Japan[J]. Pageoph, 2002, 159: 2239-2259.
[25] Wang R, Lorenzo-Martín F, Roth F. PSGRN/PSCMP-a new code for calculating co-and post-seismic deformation, geoid and gravity changes based on the viscoelastic-gravitational dislocation theory[J]. Computers and Geosciences, 2006, 32: 527-541, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2005.08.006.
[26] Hsu Y J, Segall P, Yu S B, Kuo L C, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of post-seismic deformation following the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake[J]. Geophys J Int, 2007, 169: 367-379, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03310.x.
[27] Ryder I, Parsons B, Wright T J, et al. Post-seismic motion following the 1997 Manyi (Tibet) earthquake: InSAR observations and modelling[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2007, 169: 1009-1027, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03312.x.
[28] 郭铁栓, 朱自强, 史海霞, 等. 东日本海9.0级地震对我国大陆地震的影响分析[J]. 中国地震趋势预测研究, 2012: 522-550.
[29] Hsu J J, Simons M, Williams C, et al. Three-dimensional FEM derived elastic Green's functions for the coseismic deformation of the 2005 M_W8.7 Nias-Simeulue, Sumatra earthquake[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2011, 12: 1-19, doi:10.1029/2011GC003553.