中国大陆7级强震前中小地震应变释放特征

地震 ›› 2009, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 1-11.

• • 下一篇

中国大陆7级强震前中小地震应变释放特征

蒋海昆¹, 苗青壮², 董祥², 吴琼¹, 黎明晓¹, 宋金¹

1.中国地震台网中心, 北京 100045;
2.山东省地震局, 山东济南 250014

收稿日期:2008-07-15 修回日期:2008-08-30 出版日期:2009-07-31 发布日期:2021-10-18
作者简介:蒋海昆(1964-),男,云南通海人,博士,研究员,主要从事地震序列、地震统计等研究。
基金资助:
“十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目(20070403-2006BAC01B03-02-02)及地震行业科研专项(200708020)

Characteristics of Strain Release before M7 Earthquakes in Mainland China

JIANG Hai-kun¹, MIAO Qing-zhuang², DONG Xiang² WU Qiong¹, LI Ming-xiao¹, SONG Jin¹

1. China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing 100045, China;
2. Earthquake Administration of Shandong Province, Jinan 250014, China

Received:2008-07-15 Revised:2008-08-30 Online:2009-07-31 Published:2021-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 给出加速模型拟合的穷举方法,以中国大陆21次6.8级以上地震为例,在单个震例详细研究的基础上,总结中国大陆7级左右地震前地震应变释放的群体特征。总的来看,7级左右地震前中小地震应变释放模式可分为5类,第Ⅰ类是震前震中周围较大范围应变释放加速、震中附近较小范围应变释放减速(DA),约占38%; 第Ⅱ类是震中附近较大范围应变释放减速、较小范围应变释放加速(AD),约占19%; 第Ⅲ类仅能检测出应变释放的加速特征(ASR),约占14%; 第Ⅳ类仅能检测出应变释放的减速特征(DSR),约占24%; 第Ⅴ类仅1例,各种尺度的时、空范围内,基本上呈现应变匀速释放特征(LSR)。前兆性地震序列应变加、减速释放的持续时间一般相差3~6年,这表明增强基础上的平静往往是强震前中小地震活动典型的应变释放特征。 DA模式中震前具有稳定的应变加、减速释放特征的临界区域范围平均来看大约分别是震中附近260~400 km及100~200 km,大约分别是7级左右地震平均破裂尺度的3~5倍及1~2倍; AD模式与此相反。模型参数m值具有较好的稳定性,就应变释放加速现象而言,无论何种应变释放模式、无论应变释放的绝对量如何,其加速释放速率大体相当。而从应变释放减速情形来看,“外围增强、内部减弱”的DA模式,其应变减速释放特征最为明显。

关键词: 应变释放加速, 应变释放减速, 临界区域尺度, 前兆性地震序列持续时间

Abstract: Enumerating algorithm is introduced into the fitting procedure of accelerating strain release (ASR) model. Based on the detailed study of 21 large earthquakes with M≥6.8 in mainland China, the statistical features of seismic strain release before large earthquakes have been summarized. On the whole, the strain release mode could be divided into five types. The first is DA mode, in which the accelerating and decelerating strain release has been checked respectively in broad and in small region around the epicenter, about 38% earthquake samples belongs to this type. The second is AD mode, in which the decelerating and accelerating strain release has been checked respectively in broad and in small region around the epicenter, accounting about 19%. The third is ASR, in which only accelerating strain release could be checked, it is about 14%. The forth is DSR, also only decelerating strain release could be checked, occupying ratio is about 24%. There is only one earthquake sample belongs to the fifth type (LSR), which shows a linear strain release. There is a difference of 3 to 6 years between the accelerating and decelerating duration of preshock sequence, which means that seismic quiescence after the activity generally is a typical feature of small earthquake activity before the large earthquakes. For DA mode, the average size of critical regions for steady accelerating and decelerating strain release are about 260 to 400 km and 100 to 200 km, which is 3 to 5 times and 1 to 2 times of fracture size of an earthquake with about M7, respectively. The AD mode is just opposite to the DA mode. The model parameter, m value, has a good stability, the ratio of ASR is about the same for accelerating seismic strain release phenomena, whether what the strain release modes are, or how large the strain release quantity is. Seeing from decelerating seismic strain release phenomena, the characteristic of decelerating strain release is the most obvious for DA mode, which shows a typical feature of “decelerating in-accelerating out seismic strain”.

Key words: Accelerating strain release, Decelerating strain release, Size of critical region, Duration of preshock sequence

中图分类号:

P315.7

蒋海昆, 苗青壮, 董祥, 吴琼, 黎明晓, 宋金. 中国大陆7级强震前中小地震应变释放特征[J]. 地震, 2009, 29(3): 1-11.

JIANG Hai-kun, MIAO Qing-zhuang, DONG Xiang WU Qiong, LI Ming-xiao, SONG Jin. Characteristics of Strain Release before M7 Earthquakes in Mainland China[J]. EARTHQUAKE, 2009, 29(3): 1-11.

参考文献

[1] Ellsworth W L, Lindh A G, Prescott W H, et al. The 1906 San Francisco earthquake and the seismic cycle[M]. In Earthquake Prediction: An International Review, 1981, 21-27.
[2] Sykes L R, Jaumè S. Seismic activity on neighboring faults as a long term precursor to large earthquakes in the San Fancisco Bay area[J]. Nature, 1990, 348: 595-599.
[3] Bufe, Varnes. Pridictive modeling of seismic cycling of the greater San Francisco Bay region[J]. JGR, 1993, 28: 9871-9883.
[4] Knopoff, Levshina, Keilis-Borok, et al. Increased long-range intermediate-magnitude earthquake activity prior to strong earthquakes in California[J]. JGR, 1996, 101(B3): 5779-5796.
[5] Brehm, Braile. Intermediate-Term Earthquake Prediction Using the Modified Time-to-Failure Method in Southern California[J]. BSSA, 1999, 89(1): 275-293.
[6] Sornette D, Sammis C G. Complex Critical Exponent from Renormalization Group Theory of Earthquakes : Implications for Earthquake Predictions[J]. J Phys I France, 1995, 5: 607-619.
[7] Jaumè R, Sykes. Evolving Towards a Critical Point: A Review of Accelerating Seismic Moment/Energy Release Prior to Large and Great Earthquake[J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 1999, 155: 279-306.
[8] Papazachos C b, Karakaisis G F, Savvaidis A S. Probabilities of activation of seismic faults in critical regions of the Aegean area[J]. Geophys J Int, 2004, 159: 679-687.
[9] Papazachos C B, Scordilis E M, Karakaisis G F, et al. Decelerating preshock seismic deformation in fault regions during critical periods[J]. Bull Geol Soc Greece, 2004, 36: 1-9.
[10] Papazachos C B, Karakaisis G F, Scordilis E M, et al. New observational information on the precursory accelerating and decelerating strain energy release[J]. Tectonophysics, 2006, 243: 83-96.
[11] 蒋长胜, 吴忠良, 史勇军. 中强震前地震活动矩释放加速现象(AMR)的普遍性问题[J]. 中国地震, 2004, 20(2): 119-125.
[12] Wyss M, Klein F, Johnston A C. Precursors of the Kalapana M=7.2 earthquake[J]. JGR, 1981, 86: 3881-3900.
[13] Kato N, Ohtake M, Hirasawa T. Possible mechanism of precursory seismic quiescence: regional stress relaxation due to preseismic sliding[J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 1997, 150: 249-267.
[14] Varnes D J. Predicting earthquakes by analyzing acceleration precursory seismic activity[J]. Pageoph, 1989, 130: 661-686.
[15] Bufe C G, Nishenko S P, Varnes D J. Seismicity Trends and Potential for Large Earthquakes in the Alaska-Aleutian Region[J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 1994, 142: 83-99.
[16] Das S, Scholz C H. Theory of time-dependent rupture in the earth[J]. J Geophys Res, 1981, 86: 6039-6051.
[17] Ben-Zion, Lyakhovsky. Accelerated seismic release and related aspects of seismicity patterns on earthquake faults[J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 2002, 159: 2385-2412.
[18] Lyakhovsky V, Ben-Zion Y, Agnon A. Earthquake Cycle, Fault Zones, and Seismicity Patterns in a Rheologically Layered Lithosphere[J]. JGR, 2001, 106: 4103-4120.
[19] Bowman, Quillon D D, Sammis G, et al. An observational test of the critical earthquake concept[J]. JGR, 1998, 103: 24359-24372.
[20] 吴开统, 焦远碧, 吕培苓. 地震序列概论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1990. 138-148.
[21] 蒋海昆, 郑建常, 吴琼, 等. 中国大陆中强以上地震余震分布尺度的统计特征[J]. 地震学报, 2007, 29(2): 151-164.
[22] Keilis-Borok V I, Soloviev A A. Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction[M]. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2003. 337.

中国大陆7级强震前中小地震应变释放特征

Characteristics of Strain Release before M7 Earthquakes in Mainland China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	侍文, 陈石, 韩建成, 李红蕾, 卢红艳. 中国大陆岩石圈有效弹性厚度与强震构造区力学特征研究[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 1-12.
[2]	张贝, 陈石, 李红蕾, 杨锦玲, 韩建成, 卢红艳. 时变重力场球面模型反演算法和模拟实验[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 13-24.
[3]	陈兆辉, 陈石, 张双喜, 刘金钊. 青藏高原东南缘多尺度重力场及构造含义[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 25-39.
[4]	薛兵. 关于地震观测系统中滤波器的讨论[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 40-50.
[5]	袁爱璟, 王伟君, 彭菲, 闫坤, 寇华东. 机器学习在地震预测中的应用进展[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 51-66.
[6]	赵云峰, 祝意青, 刘芳, 徐云马, 张国庆, 毛经伦, 朱辉. 2019年甘肃夏河M_S5.7地震前重力场变化[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 67-77.
[7]	王林海, 陈石, 张贝, 卢红艳. 2013年芦山M_S7.0地震前重力场源变化分析[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 78-92.
[8]	石宏宇, 王万丽, 周晓成, 颜玉聪, 李鹏飞, 姜莉, 陈志. 四川石棉公益海温泉水文地球化学特征[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 93-115.
[9]	王永哲, 陈石, 陈鲲. InSAR数据约束的2020年西藏定日M_W5.7地震源模型及构造意义[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 116-128.
[10]	李红蕾, 韩建成, 陈石, 侍文, 张贝. 基于等效源的重力异常空间导数计算方法及其在川滇地区的应用[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 129-140.
[11]	杨锦玲, 陈石, 李红蕾, 张贝, 阮明明. 华南地区时变重力场建模实验和异常分析[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 141-152.
[12]	赵明, 陈石. 基于深度学习的地震检测模型在区域台网的泛化性研究[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 166-179.
[13]	贾晓东, 翟丽娜, 陈石. 辽宁地区时变重力场源变化特征分析[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 180-190.
[14]	徐伟民, 陈石, 阮明明, 杨锦玲, 韩建成, 李红蕾, 卢红艳. 川滇地区陆地流动重力测网场源分辨能力评估[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 191-204.
[15]	郑秋月, 王青华, 刘东, 黄江培, 陈石. 基于时变重力数据的川滇地区场源模型反演和解释[J]. 地震, 2021, 41(1): 205-218.