欢迎访问《地震》，
地震

地震 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 149-159.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

地震灾后恢复重建的综合后评价框架体系及实证分析以芦山县为例

杨月巧1,2, 迟宝明1,2, 宴金旭3   

  1. 1.防灾科技学院,河北三河065201;
    2.中国地震局工程力学研究所,黑龙江哈尔滨150080;
    3.四川省地震局,四川成都610200
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-03 修回日期:2013-12-03 出版日期:2014-07-31 发布日期:2020-09-08
  • 作者简介:杨月巧(1972-),女,山西临汾人,副教授,博士,主要从事防灾减灾工程及应急管理等研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局政策研究课题(2014-26),中国地震局教师科研基金(20120111)和防灾科技学院精品建设课程基金项目(2012)

Empirical Study of Post-earthquake Reconstruction Evaluation Frame the Case of Lushan County

YANG Yue-qiao1,2, CHI Bao-ming1,2, YAN Jin-xu3   

  1. 1. Institute of Disaster Prevention Technology, Sanhe 06520, China;
    2. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, CEA, Heilongjiang 150080,China;
    3. Earthquake Management Guarantee Center,Earthquake Administration of Sichuan province, Chengdu 610200,China
  • Received:2013-10-03 Revised:2013-12-03 Online:2014-07-31 Published:2020-09-08

PDF (PC)

296

摘要： 近年来随着我国重特大地震灾害的频发,震后重建的灾区再次遭受地震灾害,部分重建项目在震后暴露出的问题引起了社会的广泛关注,因此对地震灾后重建进行综合后评价具有重要的科学和实际意义。本文在对国内外地震灾后恢复重建内容研究的基础上,确定综合后评价的一级评价指标:工程项目后评价、经济效益后评价、生态环境可持续性后评价、社会效果后评价、人文价值后评价和应急能力后评价。并利用解释结构模型(ISM)得出各指标之间的层次关系。本文以芦山县在汶川地震的重建内容对该一级评价指标进行实证分析,同时构建出该县重建综合后评价的二级指标。分析结果说明该评价框架体系指标合理,方法可行,具有一定的科学性和实用性。

关键词: 地震恢复重建, 综合后评价, 解释结构模型, 芦山M7.0地震

Abstract: In recent years, destructive eart hquakes have occurred frequently. With the re-constructed areas destroyed again, some projects that exposed quality problem have caused widespread concern. It is of important scientific significance to study post-earthquake re-construction evaluation. On the basis of the experiences on reconstruction study, we pres ented a post evaluation frame consisted of six firstrank evaluation indexes, which includ-ed? the engineering project, the economic benefit, the social effect, the sustainable devel-opment of ecological environment,the humanities construction and emergency capability. Then, we used the interpretative structural model to analyze their relations. In the paper, taking Lushan county as an example, we proved that the indexes are feasibe and rational. In addition, the second rank evaluation indexes had been built in Lushan. The results show that the post-earthquake reconstruction evaluation frame has both scientific and prac tical values.

Key words: Post-eart hquake recovery and reconstruction, Com prehensive post-eval uation frame, Interpretative structural model, Lushan M7.0 earthquake

中图分类号: